Re: Bug Report: CVS and gdbm-1.8.0-3

2001-12-07 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." wrote: > > > An easy one: the latest version of CVS [1] is still expecting to find > > > libgdbm.dll . If you copy cyggdbm.dll to that name, it works, but folks > > > new to cygwin won't kn

Re: Bug Report: CVS and gdbm-1.8.0-3

2001-12-07 Thread Charles Wilson
"Joseph M. Reagle Jr." wrote: > > > "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." wrote: > > > An easy one: the latest version of CVS [1] is still expecting to find > > > libgdbm.dll . If you copy cyggdbm.dll to that name, it works, but folks > > > new to cygwin won't know that nor recall [2]. > > > > Nope. That's not

Re: Bug Report: CVS and gdbm-1.8.0-3

2001-12-07 Thread Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
> "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." wrote: > > An easy one: the latest version of CVS [1] is still expecting to find > > libgdbm.dll . If you copy cyggdbm.dll to that name, it works, but folks > > new to cygwin won't know that nor recall [2]. > > Nope. That's not the newest version of cvs. The newest ver

Re: Bug Report: CVS and gdbm-1.8.0-3

2001-12-07 Thread Charles Wilson
"Joseph M. Reagle Jr." wrote: > > An easy one: the latest version of CVS [1] is still expecting to find > libgdbm.dll . If you copy cyggdbm.dll to that name, it works, but folks > new to cygwin won't know that nor recall [2]. Nope. That's not the newest version of cvs. The newest version is 1.