Re: About cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 08:44:51AM +, Armo Super wrote: >Hello > >What do you think about next situation? > >I have made an software, that I'm going to sell. >My software uses PostgreSql database system, witch is >distributed under BSD license. >If I want to get PostgreSql run in Windows >envir

Re: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Larry Hall
At 11:00 AM 12/11/2003, Corinna Vinschen you wrote: >On Dec 11 09:59, Larry Hall wrote: >> Also, as >> points out, it doesn't matter what license the software distributed with >> Cygwin is. If it uses cygwin1.dll, which *is* GPL'd, it's GPL'd. > >*Sic*, no. Re

RE: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
d reading and acronym translation > which you seem to require. I think I'll retire to the safety of Bochs > for now. . . > Kevin. > > | -Original Message- > | From: cygwin-ownercygwin.com > | [mailto:cygwin-ownercygwin.com]On Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski > | Sent: 11 Decembe

Re: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 11 09:59, Larry Hall wrote: > Also, as > points out, it doesn't matter what license the software distributed with > Cygwin is. If it uses cygwin1.dll, which *is* GPL'd, it's GPL'd. *Sic*, no. Read again under *** Note ***. Basically, if the applicatio

RE: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread kevin.lawton
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf | Of Igor Pechtchanski | Sent: 11 December 2003 15:08 | To: Hughes, Bill | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: About Cygwin license | | On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Hughes, Bill wrote: | | > Sent: 11 December 2003 14:28 From: Igor Pechtchanski | > > Common sense

RE: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Larry's right. Die, thread, die! Igor On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Hughes, Bill wrote: > > > Sent: 11 December 2003 14:28 From: Igor Pechtchanski > > > Common sense dictates that socket connections cannot be thought of as > > > "linking" (which is

RE: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Hughes, Bill wrote: > Sent: 11 December 2003 14:28 From: Igor Pechtchanski > > Common sense dictates that socket connections cannot be thought of as > > "linking" (which is what the GPL covers). After all, connecting with a > > proprietary ssh client to a GPL'd ssh daemon on

RE: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Larry Hall
At 09:46 AM 12/11/2003, Hughes, Bill you wrote: >Sent: 11 December 2003 14:28 From: Igor Pechtchanski >> Common sense dictates that socket connections cannot be thought of as >> "linking" (which is what the GPL covers). After all, connecting with a >> proprietary ssh client to a GPL'd ssh daemon o

RE: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Hughes, Bill
Sent: 11 December 2003 14:28 From: Igor Pechtchanski > Common sense dictates that socket connections cannot be thought of as > "linking" (which is what the GPL covers). After all, connecting with a > proprietary ssh client to a GPL'd ssh daemon on Linux doesn't make the > client GPL'd (AFAIK). No

Re: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Armo Super wrote: > Hello > > What do you think about next situation? > > I have made an software, that I'm going to sell. > My software uses PostgreSql database system, witch is > distributed under BSD license. > If I want to get PostgreSql run in Windows > environment, I nee

Re: About Cygwin license

2003-12-11 Thread Larry Hall
At 03:44 AM 12/11/2003, Armo Super you wrote: >Hello > >What do you think about next situation? > >I have made an software, that I'm going to sell. >My software uses PostgreSql database system, witch is >distributed under BSD license. >If I want to get PostgreSql run in Windows >environment, I need