[OT] RE: 1.5.21: file timestamp not updated after editing

2006-08-02 Thread Dave Korn
On 01 August 2006 00:02, Alex Eng wrote: > On 7/31/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alex? http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PCYMTNQREAIYR please. >> On Jul 30 09:27, Alex Eng wrote: >>> On 7/30/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 29 19:29, Alex Eng wrote: >

Re: 1.5.21: file timestamp not updated after editing

2006-07-31 Thread Alex Eng
On 7/31/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 30 09:27, Alex Eng wrote: > On 7/30/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Jul 29 19:29, Alex Eng wrote: > >> After editing a file, the timestamp on the file (according to ls -l) > >> is unchanged. However if stat is

Re: 1.5.21: file timestamp not updated after editing

2006-07-31 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 30 09:27, Alex Eng wrote: > On 7/30/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Jul 29 19:29, Alex Eng wrote: > >> After editing a file, the timestamp on the file (according to ls -l) > >> is unchanged. However if stat is executed, the change > >> timestamp given in the output di

Re: 1.5.21: file timestamp not updated after editing

2006-07-30 Thread Alex Eng
On 7/30/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 29 19:29, Alex Eng wrote: > After editing a file, the timestamp on the file (according to ls -l) > is unchanged. However if stat is executed, the change > timestamp given in the output differs from that given in ls -l: > > $ ls -l f

Re: 1.5.21: file timestamp not updated after editing

2006-07-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 29 19:29, Alex Eng wrote: > After editing a file, the timestamp on the file (according to ls -l) > is unchanged. However if stat is executed, the change > timestamp given in the output differs from that given in ls -l: > > $ ls -l foo.c > -rw-r--r-- 1 Alex 126 Jul 29 17:10 foo.c > $ nano