Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:36:00PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:22:42 -0500 >>From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>Wow. Nice way to escalate the issue. >> >>http://www.google.com/search?q=define:human+readable&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition >> >>If you look at

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:29:26PM +0100, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>If you look at a output of a stackdump file, it is obviously human >>readable. It is an ascii file which has English words in it. It was >>NOT clear to me that the OP had actually looked at it > >Why are

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread Mike Marchywka
cuments you can get more information but the dump as it stands is human readable. I've never seen a discusion where the word "offend" has been used and actually have it ever produce worthwhile results..... From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: cygwin@cygwin.com

RE: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> From: Eli Zaretskii > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 12:36 PM > Subject: Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions > > > Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:22:42 -0500 > > From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > If you look at a output

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Christopher Faylor wrote: > If you look at a output of a stackdump file, it is obviously human > readable. It is an ascii file which has English words in it. It was > NOT clear to me that the OP had actually looked at it Why are you 'walking on the mirrors'? They are years that we frequent t

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:22:42 -0500 > From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If you look at a output of a stackdump file, it is obviously human > readable. It is an ascii file which has English words in it. It was > NOT clear to me that the OP had actually looked at it. Others obv

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:25:08PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:43:45 +0100 >>From: Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>On Nov 23 22:07, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >>> >>> Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> >>> > Yes. It's called "cat". >>> >>> Do you think to be fun? or

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread Charles D. Russell
* /From/: Angelo Graziosi * /Subject/: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions I would ask if there is an utility that transforme an .exe.stackdump (bootstrap-emacs.exe.stackdump, for example) file in human-re

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi all, On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 Eli Zaretskii wrote: Subject: Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions > > On Nov 23 22:07, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > > > > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > > > Yes. It's called "cat". &

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-24 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:43:45 +0100 > From: Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Nov 23 22:07, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > Yes. It's called "cat". > > > > Do you think to be fun? or that a sequence of HEX characters are > > human-readable? > >

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-23 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Angelo Graziosi on 11/23/2006 2:07 PM: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Yes. It's called "cat". > > Do you think to be fun? or that a sequence of HEX characters are > human-readable? *.stackdump is certainly more human-readable than a

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 23 22:07, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > Yes. It's called "cat". > > Do you think to be fun? or that a sequence of HEX characters are > human-readable? There's nothing funny here. The stackdump file is human-readable and there's no more information. If you

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-23 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Christopher Faylor wrote: > Yes. It's called "cat". Do you think to be fun? or that a sequence of HEX characters are human-readable? What do you think people thinks about you when reading these answer from you? Angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Pr

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:59:32AM +0100, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >I would ask if there is an utility that transforme an .exe.stackdump >(bootstrap-emacs.exe.stackdump, for example) file in human-readable >informations. Yes. It's called "cat". cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#

RE: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-23 Thread Dave Korn
On 23 November 2006 09:00, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > I would ask if there is an utility that transforme an .exe.stackdump > (bootstrap-emacs.exe.stackdump, for example) file in human-readable > informations. Cut and paste the column of EIP values into "addr2line" is about the best you'll get. >

Re: .exe.stackdump and core dump files questions

2006-11-23 Thread Brian Dessent
Angelo Graziosi wrote: > I would ask if there is an utility that transforme an .exe.stackdump > (bootstrap-emacs.exe.stackdump, for example) file in human-readable > informations. You can use addr2line to resolve an address to a source file location, as long as the binary was compiled with debug