On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:22:03PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > > > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one w
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:22:03PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact.
> >
> > What do you mean? Links has a
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:50:14PM -0300, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact.
>
> What do you mean? Links has a Cygwin maintainer at least.
If you mean one who contributed a package almost 2
uot; is not much of information...
> BTW, the Subject is wrong. "Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated:
> openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1". Should be 0.9.7c-1.
Yes, I missed to change it.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin
til the packages are updated.
I don't think Links has a maintainer, or one we can contact.
And the new releases don't work well with Cygwin.
BTW, the Subject is wrong. "Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated:
openssl-0.9.7b-1, openssl-devel-0.9.7b-1". Should be 0.9.7c-1.
--
How to contact
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:28:10AM +0200, Patrick Eisenacher wrote:
> Corinna,
>
> is there an easy way to find out whether I still have a package
> installed that needs the openssl 0.9.6x compatibility package? I would
> love to get rid of this thing.
The packages still using 0.9.6 so far are
Corinna,
is there an easy way to find out whether I still have a package
installed that needs the openssl 0.9.6x compatibility package? I would
love to get rid of this thing.
Patrick
There will be no 0.9.6j compatibility package anymore. The 0.9.6
package is only kept for backward compatibili
7 matches
Mail list logo
