Re: RESOLVED: Using gcc to build a DLL discovered and linked at runtime

2003-01-17 Thread Jim Kleckner
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 06:58:17AM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> After carefully inspecting the symbols from generated dlls and dlls provided by

Re: RESOLVED: Using gcc to build a DLL discovered and linked at runtime

2003-01-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 06:58:17AM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> After carefully inspecting the symbols from >> generated dlls and dlls provided by TradeStation, >> I f

Re: RESOLVED: Using gcc to build a DLL discovered and linked at runtime

2003-01-17 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > After carefully inspecting the symbols from > generated dlls and dlls provided by TradeStation, > I found that symbols occurred with and without the > @decorations. e.g. PPI@4 and

Re: RESOLVED: Using gcc to build a DLL discovered and linked at runtime

2003-01-16 Thread Jim Kleckner
After carefully inspecting the symbols from generated dlls and dlls provided by TradeStation, I found that symbols occurred with and without the @decorations. e.g. PPI@4 and PPI. Adding -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias to the gcc line, all worked fine. Could this generally be a requirement for dlls that