On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Harald Kierer wrote:
> > Found the problem: I had a file named `rm':
> >
> > D:\acl62\src\cl\src>ls -l rm
> > -rw-r--r--1 layerNone0 Jan 28 15:47 rm
> > D:\acl62\src\cl\src>getfacl rm
> > # file: rm
> > # owner: layer
> > # group: None
> > user::rw-
> > gro
> Found the problem: I had a file named `rm':
>
> D:\acl62\src\cl\src>ls -l rm
> -rw-r--r--1 layerNone0 Jan 28 15:47 rm
> D:\acl62\src\cl\src>getfacl rm
> # file: rm
> # owner: layer
> # group: None
> user::rw-
> group::r--
> other:r--
> mask:rwx
>
> D:\acl62\src\cl\src>
>
>
Found the problem: I had a file named `rm':
D:\acl62\src\cl\src>ls -l rm
-rw-r--r--1 layerNone0 Jan 28 15:47 rm
D:\acl62\src\cl\src>getfacl rm
# file: rm
# owner: layer
# group: None
user::rw-
group::r--
other:r--
mask:rwx
D:\acl62\src\cl\src>
Now, it seems odd that `sh' (but
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 03:19:07PM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
>Does anyone have any clue where I can look? This bug is killing me.
The obvious observation would be that you have another non-cygwin
version of rm in your Windows path.
cgf
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sendin
An easier way of reproducing it:
d:\acl62\src\cl\src>ls -l foo.out
-rw-r--r--1 layerNone6 Jan 28 14:39 foo.out
d:\acl62\src\cl\src>sh -c 'rm foo.out'
d:\acl62\src\cl\src>ls -l foo.out
-rw-r--r--1 layerNone6 Jan 28 14:39 foo.out
d:\
I just found a case of `rm' failing in a makefile. I added
SHELL = bash
and the rm worked. Looks like the same deal. This seems pretty
broken. I'm really wondering if anyone else
Note: I have CYGWIN defined as "nontsec".
Also, I forgot to include a cygcheck:
D:\acl62\src\cl>cygcheck -s -h
6 matches
Mail list logo