Re: rlogind vs. smb

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 11:02:40AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > 1. does anybody know why rlogind doesn't like SMB shares? > > , or see > /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/inetutils-1.3.2.README I think this is my problem... It sure sounds like

Re: rlogind vs. smb

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Yuval Kogman wrote: > Howdy! > > We have some windows machines running Cygwin to which we'd like to > connect via rsh. > > It all works well if the passwd entry's home field points to a local > directory, and the .rhosts file in that directory contains the proper > values. > >

RE: rlogind vs. smb

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > If you set the home to //fileserver/share in the cygwin box's > /etc/passwd, then .rhosts suddenly stops being valid, and you're > asked for a password. What's funny is that if you put the right > password in, then a shell is started, and the pwd is the share, and > t

Re: rlogind vs. smb

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:11:42AM +0100, Morche Matthias wrote: > What are the permissions of .rhosts on the shares? rshd/rlogind refuses to > use them if anybody but the owner has write access! They are properly owned and properly modded - they work via NFS on all the other unixen, be they Linu

RE: rlogind vs. smb

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Howdy! > > We have some windows machines running Cygwin to which we'd like to > connect via rsh. > > It all works well if the passwd entry's home field points to a local > directory, and the .rhosts file in that directory contains the proper > values. > > The accounts