On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 10:52, Christophe Galerne wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > I never said that PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL does not block, I was challenging
> > the apparent 'cygwin threads' documentation.
>
> Right, in a way my remarq was OT... =:-D
On-Topic for Cygwin, but yes, may have bee
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 10:47, Christophe Galerne wrote:
> > Or you could check the return value from pthread_mutexattr_settype and
> > see that it returns EINVAL.
>
> The thing is it's not really an invalid value for 'type' in the call.
> Maybe it would be better to break the compilation of progr
Robert Collins wrote:
I never said that PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL does not block, I was challenging
the apparent 'cygwin threads' documentation.
Right, in a way my remarq was OT... =:-D
Christophe
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cy
Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:33, Christophe Galerne wrote:
NB: PT_MUTEX_NORMAL is not a posix mutex type - it's PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL
Right that was a typo.
Or you could check the return value from pthread_mutexattr_settype and
see that it returns EINVAL.
The thing is i
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:33, Christophe Galerne wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 23:06, Chris Knight wrote:
> > > Hello Rob,
> > >
> > > I have changed the code, see below. I now set the type to
> > > PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL but that also does not block. The only documen
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 08:33, Christophe Galerne wrote:
> This
> www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/pthread_mutexattr_settype.html
> seems to explain that a PT_MUTEX_NORMAL mutex should behave the way Chris
> expect.
NB: PT_MUTEX_NORMAL is not a posix mutex type - it's
PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL.
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 23:06, Chris Knight wrote:
> > Hello Rob,
> >
> > I have changed the code, see below. I now set the type to
> > PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL but that also does not block. The only documentation
> > on cygwin threads say this is the same as PTHREAD_MUTEX_FAST_
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 23:06, Chris Knight wrote:
> Hello Rob,
>
> I have changed the code, see below. I now set the type to
> PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL but that also does not block. The only documentation
> on cygwin threads say this is the same as PTHREAD_MUTEX_FAST_NP
What documentation says that
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 20:37, Chris Knight wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I have found a problem in the "pthread_mutex_trylock" call. When I
> run the following code both the trylock and lock return immediately. If I
> compile this under RedHat 8 it works as I would expect with the trylock
> locking
9 matches
Mail list logo
