On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 08:15:08PM +1300, Danny Smith wrote:
>cgf wrote:
>>On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:37:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>On Mar 2 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
>Hm. We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code
Original Message
>From: Christopher Faylor
>Sent: 03 March 2005 00:59
> I've checked in a patch to cygwin which saves and restores the FPU control
> register around calls to LoadLibrary. That seems to solve the problem.
Confirmed here, but why did you remove the comment? It's still t
cgf wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:37:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Mar 2 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
Hm. We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code
somewhere. wsock_init () looks like just the place.. now
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 11:32:39AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:37:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Mar 2 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
Hm. We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code
somew
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 06:42:13PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>Original Message
>>From: Christopher Faylor
>>Sent: 02 March 2005 17:41
>
>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:21:55PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> And I can confirm that adding 'asm ("finit");' to wsock_init (I put it
>>> inside the "if (
Original Message
>From: Christopher Faylor
>Sent: 02 March 2005 17:41
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:21:55PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>> And I can confirm that adding 'asm ("finit");' to wsock_init (I put it
>> inside the "if (!wsock_started)" clause, just after the closing brace
>> of the "i
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:21:55PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>And I can confirm that adding 'asm ("finit");' to wsock_init (I put it
>inside the "if (!wsock_started)" clause, just after the closing brace
>of the "if (wsastartup)" clause) fixes both the testcase that Ralf
>posted this morning and also
Original Message
>From: Christopher Faylor
>Sent: 02 March 2005 16:33
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:37:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Mar 2 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
Hm. We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload
Original Message
>From: Corinna Vinschen
>Sent: 02 March 2005 14:32
> On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Hm. We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code
>> somewhere. wsock_init () looks like just the place.. now if I just
>> persuade the CVS code to build
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:37:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Mar 2 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>Hm. We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code
>>>somewhere. wsock_init () looks like just the place.. now if I
>>>just pe
On Mar 2 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
> > Hm. We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code
> > somewhere. wsock_init () looks like just the place.. now if I just
> > persuade the CVS code to build without a SIG11 (grmbl grmbl
On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
> Hm. We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code
> somewhere. wsock_init () looks like just the place.. now if I just
> persuade the CVS code to build without a SIG11 (grmbl grmbl)
Hmm? -v please.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinsch
Original Message
>From: Ralf B. Schulz
>Sent: 02 March 2005 12:07
> This is a follow-up on thread "1.5.12: FPU affected by gethostname call".
> It shows that calling some functions of the windows API will affect the
> floating point unit so that all calculation are performed with double
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
