Dave Korn wrote:
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00652.html
>
> I've read that message a dozen times, and I can't make head or tail of it.
>
> It seems to be saying that you can post to the list in a special way that
> adds a "Reply-To" header to your post with your own email
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Thanks for that but doesn't seem like strace -p works
> it just returns to the command line instantly no errors no
> nothing.
>
Your usage is correct.
Let me guess, this is strace from 1.5.5. It was broken in this regard.
Please use the strace and D
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Ford
>
Try it, it works. Notice the above :).
> Brian Ford wrote:
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00652.html
> >
> I've read that message a dozen times, and I can't make head or tail of it.
>
> It
Thanks for that but doesn't seem like strace -p works
it just returns to the command line instantly no errors no
nothing. using:
strace -o test.txt -p 1676
I just get an empty file then strace quits. Cant see anything
stupid Im missing
were ps -al gives:
PIDPPIDPGID WINPID TTY UID
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Ford
> > Does appear the list software needs a bit of an update though.
> > The issue with it setting personal address as the reply to
> field could
> > do with being fixed at the very least would save a lot of hassle.
> >
>
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote:
> That's one for the notes for the future. A totally new subject and
> new content tends to indicate a new thread to my mail reader
> but I suppose all are not created even.
>
Use a better reader :).
> Does appear the list software needs a bit of an up
From: "Brian Ford"
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> > Sorry did I miss something where was the new issue?
> >
> My mailer and the
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Steven Hartland
> Sent: 27 January 2004 16:49
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU
>
> Sorry did I miss something where was the new issue?
>
&
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Sorry did I miss something where was the new issue?
>
My mailer and the list archives show your original message as a reply to:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg01171.html
So, the new issue was your original one.
--
Brian Ford
Senior Real
Sorry did I miss something where was the new issue?
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Ford"
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU
> Please start a new thread rather than replying to
Please start a new thread rather than replying to an old one for new
issues.
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Steven Hartland wrote:
> General question has anyone else seen processes running under
> cygwin using 100% CPU when the shouldn't.
> The background is cygwin 1.5.5 I have a perl script which
> monito
004 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU
> Try upgrading to 1.5.6-1 and retest. A lot of things causing aberrant CPU
> and memory using and process hangs have been fixed with this release. No
> promises that it covers your problem, but anyone
Try upgrading to 1.5.6-1 and retest. A lot of things causing aberrant CPU
and memory using and process hangs have been fixed with this release. No
promises that it covers your problem, but anyone reporting problems with
older versions of the cygwin1.dll is only going to be told
UPGRADE
before the
13 matches
Mail list logo
