On 12 Jun 2006 17:06:33 -, Reid Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Subject: Re: Updated: vim-7.0.017-1
Luis P Caamano wrote:
> Well, almost. After updating I realized that gvim is not included :-(
> so I ended up with a vim 7.0 and a gvim 6.4, which is not that useful
> it
Luis P Caamano wrote:
Well, almost. After updating I realized that gvim is not included :-(
so I ended up with a vim 7.0 and a gvim 6.4, which is not that useful
it seems. Had to go back to 6.4.
:-(
On 6/12/06, Luis P Caamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/12/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL P
Sorry for this: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-06/msg00250.html,
just now I have seen vim-7.0.017-2!
Thanks,
Angelo.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.ht
After the upgrade to vim-7.0.017-1:
-
$ echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/c/texmf/miktex/bin:/c/WINNT/system3
2:/c/WINNT:/c/WINNT/System32/Wbem:/c/Borland/BCC55/Bin:/usr/local/cernlib/2005/b
in:/usr/lib/lapack:/
Well, almost. After updating I realized that gvim is not included :-(
so I ended up with a vim 7.0 and a gvim 6.4, which is not that useful
it seems. Had to go back to 6.4.
:-(
On 6/12/06, Luis P Caamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/12/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I h
After the install I noticed executables were unpacked into
D:\cygwin\usr\bin, not to /usr/bin resolved to /bin via a standard mount
point. This results the programs are unvisible under bash.
Perhaps something is wrong with the tarball itself? In other *.bz2 files
I can see their archived files star
On 6/12/06, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1.
This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim
still builds from the vanilla sources.
Thank you
--
Luis P Caamano
Atlanta, GA USA
--
Unsubscribe in
7 matches
Mail list logo