On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 3:20 PM Jonathan Chapman-Moore via Cygwin
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was considering the people at Cygwin rebrand Cygwin to Services for UNIX.
SFU might be a M$ trademark.
But what about "Services for POSIX" - "SFP"?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com
At 01:06 AM 1/17/2004, Christopher Faylor you wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:01:17PM -0800, Peter Skj?tt Larsen wrote:
>>While realizing that this list is not about SFU, closer examination
>>reveals that the dev environment in SFU 3.5 (and prior versions) is gcc
>>and SFU allows for Visual Stud
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:01:17PM -0800, Peter Skj?tt Larsen wrote:
>While realizing that this list is not about SFU, closer examination
>reveals that the dev environment in SFU 3.5 (and prior versions) is gcc
>and SFU allows for Visual Studio to be invoked as well - e.g. $CC
>implies by default
ndard install
however, some useful things are not turned on by default!
Kind Regards
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert McNulty Junior
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 12:45 PM
To: 'Gerrit P. Haase'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Gerrit P. Haase
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SFU installed -> rxvt problems
Olaf wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:19:55PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Olaf wro
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:33:51AM -0800, David A. Case wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 16, 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> >> >I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:33:51AM -0800, David A. Case wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 16, 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> >I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
>> >the computer I cannot open a rxvt te
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> >I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
> >the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X. It
> >complains:
> >$ /usr/bin/rxvt
> >rx
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
>the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X. It
>complains:
>$ /usr/bin/rxvt
>rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0
I hope this isn't the s
Olaf wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:19:55PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Olaf wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> >> Hallo,
>> >>
>> >> I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
>> >> the computer I cannot ope
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:19:55PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Olaf wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> >> Hallo,
> >>
> >> I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
> >> the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal with
Olaf wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>> Hallo,
>>
>> I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
>> the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X. It
>> complains:
>> $ /usr/bin/rxvt
>> rxvt: can't open display
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
> the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X. It
> complains:
> $ /usr/bin/rxvt
> rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0
It see
I sue the NFS component for SFU on Many machines here (as well as
Diskaccess, it's core app). Never had a problem, I've been doing it for 3
years now...
- Original Message -
From: "Jon LaBadie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "cygwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 4:52 AM
Su
sharing Win2k dirs by NFS.
> >
> > Pavel.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Elfyn McBratney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Sun, January 26, 2003 3:15 PM
> > > To: cygwin; Jon LaBadie
> > > Subject: Re: SFU
> &
sharing Win2k dirs by NFS.
> >
> > Pavel.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Elfyn McBratney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Sun, January 26, 2003 3:15 PM
> > > To: cygwin; Jon LaBadie
> > > Subject: Re: SFU
> >
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> > Has anyone one on the list attempted the same and had any positive or
> > negative experiences with interaction between the two systems.
>
> Not personally. But I have been told that they cannot live together. If you
> search the archives for "posix
t; > -Original Message-
> > From: Elfyn McBratney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sun, January 26, 2003 3:15 PM
> > To: cygwin; Jon LaBadie
> > Subject: Re: SFU
> >
> >
> > > Has anyone one on the list attempted the same and had any
> >
26, 2003 3:15 PM
> To: cygwin; Jon LaBadie
> Subject: Re: SFU
>
>
> > Has anyone one on the list attempted the same and had any
> positive or
> > negative experiences with interaction between the two systems.
>
> Not personally. But I have been told that th
> Has anyone one on the list attempted the same and had any positive or
> negative experiences with interaction between the two systems.
Not personally. But I have been told that they cannot live together. If you
search the archives for "posix sub-system" you may find one or two posts
relating to
20 matches
Mail list logo
