On Feb 15 11:44, David Allsopp wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 9 13:12, David Allsopp wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > On Feb 9 11:29, David Allsopp wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > When this was originally encountered for 64-bit MSVC (this was all
>
>
>
> > > > I'm cur
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 9 13:12, David Allsopp wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Feb 9 11:29, David Allsopp wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > When this was originally encountered for 64-bit MSVC (this was all
> > > I'm curious why this isn't done yet.
> >
> > I'm hoping that doin
On Feb 9 13:12, David Allsopp wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 9 11:29, David Allsopp wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > When this was originally encountered for 64-bit MSVC (this was all
> > > added before Cygwin64 existed), the solution at the time was to keep
> > > the preferred base addresse
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 9 12:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 9 11:29, David Allsopp wrote:
> > > > Apart from that, not only Cygwin DLLs but also the Windows system
> > > > DLLs are all loaded and relocated to the area beyond 0x1:8000,
> > > > so relocation beyond the 32 bit a
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 9 11:29, David Allsopp wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Feb 8 11:47, David Allsopp wrote:
> > > > TL;DR flexlink-compiled DLLs (i.e. ocaml libraries) are broken by
> > > > the
> > > > 0x2 base address requirement added in rebase 4.4.4.
> > > > P
On Feb 9 12:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 9 11:29, David Allsopp wrote:
> > > Apart from that, not only Cygwin DLLs but also the Windows system DLLs
> > > are all loaded and relocated to the area beyond 0x1:8000, so
> > > relocation beyond the 32 bit address space is no generic problem
On Feb 9 11:29, David Allsopp wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 8 11:47, David Allsopp wrote:
> > > TL;DR flexlink-compiled DLLs (i.e. ocaml libraries) are broken by the
> > > 0x2 base address requirement added in rebase 4.4.4. Possible
> > > fixes for this at the bottom.
> > >
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 8 11:47, David Allsopp wrote:
> > TL;DR flexlink-compiled DLLs (i.e. ocaml libraries) are broken by the
> > 0x2 base address requirement added in rebase 4.4.4. Possible
> > fixes for this at the bottom.
> > [...]
> > $ ocaml
> > OCaml version 4.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 8 11:47, David Allsopp wrote:
> > TL;DR flexlink-compiled DLLs (i.e. ocaml libraries) are broken by the
> > 0x2 base address requirement added in rebase 4.4.4. Possible
> > fixes for this at the bottom.
> >
> > Commit bfd383 in the rebase sources introduces
On Feb 8 11:47, David Allsopp wrote:
> TL;DR flexlink-compiled DLLs (i.e. ocaml libraries) are broken by the
> 0x2 base address requirement added in rebase 4.4.4. Possible fixes
> for this at the bottom.
> [...]
> $ ocaml
> OCaml version 4.04.2
>
> # #load "unix.cma";;
> C
On Feb 8 11:47, David Allsopp wrote:
> TL;DR flexlink-compiled DLLs (i.e. ocaml libraries) are broken by the
> 0x2 base address requirement added in rebase 4.4.4. Possible fixes
> for this at the bottom.
>
> Commit bfd383 in the rebase sources introduces a new minimum base address
> requi
11 matches
Mail list logo
