Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 07:47 Emily, wrote: > Thanks to Ken, and Marco, and everyone who provided input. I confirm that > my original command is working again with the 11-4 version on my Ebay > PDFs. I truly appreciate the quick response and fix! > > Best wishes! > Emily > > > Thanks for the conf

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

Thanks to Ken, and Marco, and everyone who provided input.  I confirm that my original command is working again with the 11-4 version on my Ebay PDFs.  I truly appreciate the quick response and fix! Best wishes! Emily On Thursday, June 25, 2020, 9:00:32 PM PDT, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 26.0

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 26.06.2020 05:38, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 25.06.2020 22:51, Emily wrote: I switched to mirrors.kernel.org, and still don't see an 11-4, screenshot attached.  Is there a setting that hides test packages? My fault. I built and uploaded only the 64bit version as I was in the hurry It seems

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 25.06.2020 22:51, Emily wrote: I switched to mirrors.kernel.org, and still don't see an 11-4, screenshot attached.  Is there a setting that hides test packages? My fault. I built and uploaded only the 64bit version as I was in the hurry It seems you are still on 32bit. building it, now

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 24.06.2020 20:46, Emily wrote: Hi Marco, I don't see that one, do I need to add a special download site?  Thanks! just uploaded on the main site wait a bit for the mirror sites to synchronize Regards Marco -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 6/24/2020 2:46 PM, Emily via Cygwin wrote: Hi Marco, I don't see that one, do I need to add a special download site?  Thanks! You might not have waited long enough for it to propagate to the mirrors. But I just checked mirrors.kernel.org, and it's there. Since it's a test package, you'l

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

Hi Marco, I don't see that one, do I need to add a special download site?  Thanks! On Wednesday, June 24, 2020, 11:21:59 AM PDT, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 24.06.2020 12:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: > On 6/24/2020 1:30 AM, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote: >> On 23.06.2020 23:02, Marco Atzeri w

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 24.06.2020 12:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 6/24/2020 1:30 AM, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote: On 23.06.2020 23:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 23.06.2020 22:56, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: I think I've found the problem, although it will take patching and rebuilding ImageMagick (which I h

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 6/24/2020 1:30 AM, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote: On 23.06.2020 23:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 23.06.2020 22:56, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: I think I've found the problem, although it will take patching and rebuilding ImageMagick (which I haven't done) to confirm that I'm right. In the I

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 23.06.2020 23:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 23.06.2020 22:56, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: I think I've found the problem, although it will take patching and rebuilding ImageMagick (which I haven't done) to confirm that I'm right. In the ImageMagick source file coders/ps.c:237, there's a call

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 23.06.2020 22:56, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 6/23/2020 2:18 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 6/23/2020 12:56 PM, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote: On 23.06.2020 15:03, Markus Hoenicka wrote: On 2020-06-23 14:15, Ken Brown via Cygwin was heard to say: On 6/23/2020 7:27 AM, Ken Brown via

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 6/23/2020 2:18 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 6/23/2020 12:56 PM, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote: On 23.06.2020 15:03, Markus Hoenicka wrote: On 2020-06-23 14:15, Ken Brown via Cygwin was heard to say: On 6/23/2020 7:27 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 6/22/2020 9:37 PM, Emily via Cyg

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

Hi Emily, On 6/23/2020 3:32 PM, Emily wrote: Any actual label.pdf would contain the Ebay buyer's name and address, and my return address.  Is there a tool I can use to redact sensitive information in a PDF? There's no need. I've found the bug, as I will explain in a separate message. Ken -

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

Hi Ken, Any actual label.pdf would contain the Ebay buyer's name and address, and my return address.  Is there a tool I can use to redact sensitive information in a PDF? I am attaching two files: debug.txt is the output of adding `-debug all` to the convert command, and convert.exe.stackdump i

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 6/23/2020 12:56 PM, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote: On 23.06.2020 15:03, Markus Hoenicka wrote: On 2020-06-23 14:15, Ken Brown via Cygwin was heard to say: On 6/23/2020 7:27 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 6/22/2020 9:37 PM, Emily via Cygwin wrote: But in case other ImageMagick functi

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 23.06.2020 15:03, Markus Hoenicka wrote: On 2020-06-23 14:15, Ken Brown via Cygwin was heard to say: On 6/23/2020 7:27 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 6/22/2020 9:37 PM, Emily via Cygwin wrote: But in case other ImageMagick functionality is also broken, this isn't a permanent solutio

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:15:01 -0400 From: Ken Brown via Cygwin > On 6/23/2020 7:27 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: > > On 6/22/2020 9:37 PM, Emily via Cygwin wrote: > >> I use ImageMagick to convert and crop shipping labels from PDFs generated > >> by > >> Ebay.  On 6/8, this command worked: >

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 2020-06-23 14:15, Ken Brown via Cygwin was heard to say: On 6/23/2020 7:27 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 6/22/2020 9:37 PM, Emily via Cygwin wrote: I use ImageMagick to convert and crop shipping labels from PDFs generated by Ebay.  On 6/8, this command worked: $ convert -density 300 -

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 6/23/2020 7:27 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 6/22/2020 9:37 PM, Emily via Cygwin wrote: I use ImageMagick to convert and crop shipping labels from PDFs generated by Ebay.  On 6/8, this command worked: $ convert -density 300 -crop 1500x1200 label.pdf label.png Aborted (core dumped) Th

Re: ImageMagick maybe broken by libgs9 upgrade

On 6/22/2020 9:37 PM, Emily via Cygwin wrote: I use ImageMagick to convert and crop shipping labels from PDFs generated by Ebay.  On 6/8, this command worked: $ convert -density 300 -crop 1500x1200 label.pdf label.png Aborted (core dumped) The command still runs on PDFs that were not generate

Re: ImageMagick 'convert' program broken, error in cyggs-9.dll x86_64/release/ghostscript/libgs9/libgs9-9.27-1.tar.xz

Hi Marco, "gm covert" works for me. Still, having imagemagick's convert back to normal would be great M Il giorno dom 23 giu 2019 alle ore 12:13 Marco Atzeri ha scritto: > > Am 13.06.2019 um 12:06 schrieb Massimiliano Alvioli: > > I actually run into the same problem: convert is unable to co

Re: ImageMagick 'convert' program broken, error in cyggs-9.dll x86_64/release/ghostscript/libgs9/libgs9-9.27-1.tar.xz

Am 13.06.2019 um 12:06 schrieb Massimiliano Alvioli: I actually run into the same problem: convert is unable to convert eps files to png files, right after an update, like a month ago. I updated everything again a couple of times since then, but still it does not work. I am running cygwin in wind

Re: ImageMagick 'convert' program broken, error in cyggs-9.dll x86_64/release/ghostscript/libgs9/libgs9-9.27-1.tar.xz

Ken, a re-install fixed this issue, thanks for pointing out the version mismatch. On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 12:00 PM Ken Brown wrote: > > On 6/10/2019 1:16 PM, Keith Christian wrote: > > Strace shows this in a dialog box when it fails: > > The procedure entry point uname_x could not be loc

Re: ImageMagick 'convert' program broken, error in cyggs-9.dll x86_64/release/ghostscript/libgs9/libgs9-9.27-1.tar.xz

On 6/10/2019 1:16 PM, Keith Christian wrote: > Strace shows this in a dialog box when it fails: > The procedure entry point uname_x could not be located in the > dynamic link library C:\cygwin64\bin\cyggs-9dll. > > > Version info: > $ uname -a > CYGWIN_NT-10.0 DESKTOP-O

Re: ImageMagick is crashing

On 31/05/2017 08:56, Axel Heinrici wrote: Hello, strace doesn't seem to work either. $ strace convert z06.png z06.jpg 0 [main] strace 8996 C:\cygwin64\bin\strace.exe: *** fatal error - Internal error: TP_NUM_W_BUFS too small: 50. 1341 [main] strace 8996 cygwin_exception::open_stackdu

Re: ImageMagick is crashing

Hello,   this is a company computer, on which I don't have admin privileges. Though possible, I have to be frugal with provident reinstallations. I need a little higher level of certainty on the cause of these problems to ask the IT-department for another reinstallation. > comparing with mine I

Re: ImageMagick is crashing

gards, Axel   Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2017 um 06:59 Uhr Von: "Marco Atzeri" An: "Axel Heinrici" , "cygwin@cygwin.com" Betreff: Re: ImageMagick is crashing On 30/05/2017 15:26, Axel Heinrici wrote: > Hello, > > the question remains, what is going wrong

Re: ImageMagick is crashing

On 30/05/2017 11:36, Axel Heinrici wrote: Hello, Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Mai 2017 um 10:21 Uhr Von: "Marco Atzeri" [...] Please also send on the mailing list as attachment your cygcheck.out as mentioned on https://cygwin.com/problems.html[https://cygwin.com/problems.html] Is attached now.

Re: ImageMagick is crashing

An: "Axel Heinrici" Betreff: Re: ImageMagick is crashing On 30/05/2017 11:33, Axel Heinrici wrote: Hello, here is the file. It is an image of a laser spot with some unwanted reflections in the setup. So you won't see anything meaningful. The picture is coming from a 12 bit camera with the

Re: ImageMagick is crashing

Hello,    Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Mai 2017 um 10:21 Uhr Von: "Marco Atzeri" [...] > Please also send on the mailing list as attachment your cygcheck.out > as mentioned on > https://cygwin.com/problems.html[https://cygwin.com/problems.html] Is attached now. Best regards, Axel Heinrici c

Re: ImageMagick is crashing

On 30/05/2017 09:39, Axel Heinrici wrote: Hello, I have a problem using ImageMagick in Cygwin. Whenever I use a "-crop" in ImageMagick, it is hanging up. It is not generating an error, no output file is created. The command looks like this: convert z06.png -crop 500x500+200+200 test.jpg, where

Re: ImageMagick -6 not wotrking in WXP

On 8/26/2016 3:49 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Ken Brown writes: This is a known issue (on 32-bit Cygwin only), triggered by the recent update of libgd3: https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-08/msg00339.html The workaround is to revert to the previous version (2.1.1-2) of libgd3. You also need

Re: ImageMagick -6 not wotrking in WXP

Ken Brown writes: > This is a known issue (on 32-bit Cygwin only), triggered by the recent > update of libgd3: > > https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-08/msg00339.html > > The workaround is to revert to the previous version (2.1.1-2) of libgd3. You also need to ensure that libvpx1 is installed

Re: ImageMagick -6 not wotrking in WXP

On 8/23/2016 7:28 PM, Rodrigo Medina wrote: Hi, From an xterm the command display picture.jpg exits without doing anything. This is a known issue (on 32-bit Cygwin only), triggered by the recent update of libgd3: https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-08/msg00339.html The workaround i

Re: ImageMagick-6.9.0.0-1 ( autotrace circular dependency)

On 1/9/2015 8:06 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: I do not know if this is relevant (see [*]), but I need this link, cd /usr/lib ln -sf libMagickCore-6.Q16.dll.a libMagickCore.dll.a also while configuring, otherwise these tests fail: checking for MagickExportImagePixels... no checking fo

Re: ImageMagick-6.9.0.0-1 ( autotrace circular dependency)

I do not know if this is relevant (see [*]), but I need this link, cd /usr/lib ln -sf libMagickCore-6.Q16.dll.a libMagickCore.dll.a also while configuring, otherwise these tests fail: checking for MagickExportImagePixels... no checking for MagickMergeImageLayers... no From config.log,

Re: ImageMagick/GraphicsMagick: x86_64 rebuild

On 2013-10-12 14:22, marco atzeri wrote: uploaded Graphics-Magick-1.3.18-3 and Image-Magick-6.7.6.3-4. Thanks. I noticed a curios bug on cygport, it reports Graphics-Magick depending from libpng14 instead of libpng15. I don't see how, as there never has been a libpng14 for x86_64. Yaakov

Re: ImageMagick/GraphicsMagick: x86_64 rebuild

Il 10/11/2013 10:21 AM, marco atzeri ha scritto: Il 10/11/2013 6:44 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) ha scritto: Marco, IIUC, ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick were both built early on for x86_64, and appear to be missing support for many formats due to missing libraries at the time. Could you rebuild/updat

Re: ImageMagick/GraphicsMagick: x86_64 rebuild

Il 10/11/2013 6:44 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) ha scritto: Marco, IIUC, ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick were both built early on for x86_64, and appear to be missing support for many formats due to missing libraries at the time. Could you rebuild/update these now with all possible formats now that the

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

Marco gets the diagnostic prize!! Font name was the issue. Used -font Helvetica, and all went like a charm!! So, thank you, Marco. > use a font name recognized by unix and not a windows one, > eg -font Helvetica > > to look on font name a use xfontsel from xterm. > > -- Problem reports:

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

On 8/14/2012 9:42 PM, Paul Thompson wrote: I will try that tonight. The other install of ImageMagick also gave me the arial font error, but handled it more gracefully. Is there some way to getting the fonts on to the path so that I don't need to do the copy around? It seems odd that fonts can

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

> Paul, > it is not a rebase error. > It is ImageMagick mishandling the missing font. > > GraphickMagick equivalent is correctly handling the case and the > error message is more clear. > > $ gm montage -label "D Brausch Wedding,1951" zimg002.miff -font Arial > -pointsize 20 -frame 40 -geometry +0

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

On 8/14/2012 7:44 PM, Paul Thompson wrote: There's autorebase, which is called from setup, but the method is not entirely foolproof. If you installed exactly once and then don't start setup again unless new packages are available, you're ok, but if you start setup a couple of times to install mo

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

>There's autorebase, which is called from setup, but the method is not >entirely foolproof. If you installed exactly once and then don't start >setup again unless new packages are available, you're ok, but if you >start setup a couple of times to install more packages you forgot in >the first run,

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

On Aug 14 10:56, Paul Thompson wrote: > > > > Wow. That's rather unexpected. Unfortunately the error code -2 is just > > an artefact, not the actual error code. I fixed that in CVS. Did you > > try if rebaseall fixes this issue? > > > > > > OK, I just learned about rebaseall. I am not actually

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

On 8/14/2012 11:56 AM, Paul Thompson wrote: Wow. That's rather unexpected. Unfortunately the error code -2 is just an artefact, not the actual error code. I fixed that in CVS. Did you try if rebaseall fixes this issue? OK, I just learned about rebaseall. I am not actually on the machine

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

> > Wow. That's rather unexpected. Unfortunately the error code -2 is just > an artefact, not the actual error code. I fixed that in CVS. Did you > try if rebaseall fixes this issue? > > OK, I just learned about rebaseall. I am not actually on the machine in question, and will try this tonight

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

On Aug 14 09:15, Paul Thompson wrote: > I thought I submitted to the right queue, but clearly did not. Perhaps > my mail did not get received. > > I have run cygcheck as requested and attached the output cygcheck.out > to this email > > I run the following commands: > > d2u dirlist.txt > convert

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

On 8/14/2012 11:14 AM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: Paul Thompson wrote: Marco: I followed the error reporting directions. How long is the usual wait for a response? I've only found two messages from you on this list: - http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-08/msg00251.html - http://cygwin.com/ml/cyg

RE: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

Paul Thompson wrote: > Marco: I followed the error reporting directions. How long is the usual wait > for a response? I've only found two messages from you on this list: - http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-08/msg00251.html - http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-08/msg00297.html This implies you'v

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

On 8/13/2012 8:04 PM, Paul Thompson wrote: marco atzeri gmail.com> writes: Marco: I followed the error reporting directions. How long is the usual wait for a response? Marco is generally rather prompt with replies but there is no time limit for replies on this list. I'm sure you'll he

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

marco atzeri gmail.com> writes: > > > > Marco: I followed the error reporting directions. How long is the usual wait for a response? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html

Re: imagemagick errors under cygwin on 64-bit Win 7 system

On 8/12/2012 2:32 PM, Paul Thompson wrote: I have installed cygwin. I am trying to use a combination of bash, imagemagick, LaTeX, and a few other packages. I have issues with imagemagick. If I run imagemagick installed externally, i get no problems - run cleanly. When I try to run imagemagick (s

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

I did a fresh install of cygwin today. I ran into the problem described at http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-08/msg00502.html (that was almost two months ago) http://cygwin.com/faq/ does not mention this issue. http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html#cygX11-6.dll-missing currently say

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

2010/8/18 Andy Koppe: > On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: >>> On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >>> >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining th

Re: ImageMagick: Still more insufficient package dependencies?

Ken Brown wrote: This looks to me like an Emacs configuration problem, not a Cygwin problem. The code in image.c:7723 is guarded by #ifdef HAVE_MAGICKEXPORTIMAGEPIXELS, and configure reported "no" in the corresponding test. If I understand this rightly, ... checking for MagickExportImagePixe

Re: ImageMagick: Still more insufficient package dependencies?

On 8/19/2010 7:33 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: I am trying to build the development version of Emacs with the imagemagick support. In the configure step one gets: $ ./configure --with-imagemagick [...] checking for Wand... yes checking IMAGEMAGICK_CFLAGS... -fopenmp -I/usr/include/ImageMagick chec

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

On Aug 18 21:57, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: > >> On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: > >> >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

On 18 August 2010 21:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: >> On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >> >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick >> >>package,

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote: > On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: > >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick > >>package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process for

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:32:50PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >>>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the >>>ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be an

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process for reporting bugs which might narrow down the

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote: >My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the >ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process >for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more >relevant set of people.

Re: ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

I have now installed the packages libX11_6 and libXext6. ImageMagick's "convert" is now working. I suspect that the ImageMagick Cygwin package may need to be modified to make it depend on libX11_6 and libXext6. Bill -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: ImageMagick SVG Problem

2010/7/3 : > Has anybody using ImageMagick noticed that 'display' and other ImageMagick > tools are having trouble displaying SVG files? Most of the tools complained > about missing files in the /usr/share/fonts/corefonts/ directory, so I > created a symlink to /c/Windows/Fonts/ (in Win7 Crippl

Re: ImageMagick 6.4.0.6-2 does not work out-of-the-box on a fresh Cygwin install: Possible package dependency issue?

wynfi...@gmail.com wrote: William Blunn wrote: ImageMagick 6.4.0.6-2 does not work out-of-the-box on a fresh Cygwin install. Intertesting I had no trouble with ImageMagick 6.6.2-1, which is newer of course. It built with no trouble out of the tarball downloaded from Imagemagick source. I bu

Re: ImageMagick 6.4.0.6-2 does not work out-of-the-box on a fresh Cygwin install: Possible package dependency issue?

On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 09:24 +, Marco Atzeri wrote: > more precisely, the dependency of libImageMagick1 are wrong > > From libImageMagick1 entry in setup.ini: > requires: libbz2_1 libfontconfig1 libfpx libfreetype6 > libjasper1 libjbig2 libjpe g62 liblcms1 libpng12 libtiff6 > libxml2 xorg-serv

Re: ImageMagick 6.4.0.6-2 does not work out-of-the-box on a fresh Cygwin install: Possible package dependency issue?

Intertesting I had no trouble with ImageMagick 6.6.2-1, which is newer of course. It built with no trouble out of the tarball downloaded from Imagemagick source. I built it and amd using it now on CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.7.5(0.225/5/3) Did you mean something else about "out-of-the-box"? regards Will

Re: ImageMagick 6.4.0.6-2 does not work out-of-the-box on a fresh Cygwin install: Possible package dependency issue?

--- Lun 28/6/10, William Blunn ha scritto: > Data: Lunedì 28 giugno 2010, 10:52 > As a temporary fudge hack workaround > bodge to get things moving, I have attempted to find the > missing DLLs. > > == cyggomp-1.dll == > > Try installing libgomp1 4.3.4-3 "GOMP shared runtime" ? > > == cygltdl-7

Re: ImageMagick 6.4.0.6-2 does not work out-of-the-box on a fresh Cygwin install: Possible package dependency issue?

As a temporary fudge hack workaround bodge to get things moving, I have attempted to find the missing DLLs. == cyggomp-1.dll == Try installing libgomp1 4.3.4-3 "GOMP shared runtime" ? == cygltdl-7.dll == Try installing libltdl7 2.2.7a-15 "Libtool's dynamic loader (runtime)" ? == cygtiff-5.dl

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

On 4/25/2010 3:00 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: On 4/24/2010 6:44 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: We discourage feeding the spammers a

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

Sivaram Neelakantan schrieb: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: This appears to be a bug with ImageMagick. Last time it came up on this list, there was a suggested workaround: That worked. You may also want to do some research into

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: > On 4/24/2010 6:44 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: >> "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: > > We discourage feeding the > spammers around here. Ack! Sorry about that. [snipped

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

On 4/24/2010 6:44 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: We discourage feeding the spammers around here. < [snipped 8 lines] montage: unable to read font `/usr/lib/ImageMagi

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: [snipped 8 lines] montage: unable to read font `/usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.4.0/config//usr/share/fonts/corefonts/arial.ttf'. [snipped 10 lines] > > You haven't mentioned yet whether this file exists and is accessi

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

On 4/23/2010 12:45 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: Eric Blake writes: ^ Feeding the spammers only makes them hungry. On 04/22/2010 11:43 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: montage: unable to read font `/usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.4.0/

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

Eric Blake writes: > On 04/22/2010 11:43 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: >> montage: unable to read font >> `/usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.4.0/config//usr/share/fonts/corefonts/arial.ttf'. >> >> This issue was there in the previous packaged release too. > > That's

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

On 04/22/2010 11:43 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > montage: unable to read font > `/usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.4.0/config//usr/share/fonts/corefonts/arial.ttf'. > > This issue was there in the previous packaged release too. That's not necessarily a bug. POSIX

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

Reini Urban writes: [snipped 21 lines] > Thanks for the report. I did this ImageMagick upload, though I'm not > the original maintainer, so I missed some dependencies. > > Volker, did you record this? And there seems to some problem with the path separator in some file? Montage works but it th

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

Rolf Campbell schrieb: On 2010-04-22 01:37, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: On 4/21/2010 11:17 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: 'cygcheck montage' and 'cygcheck convert' should tell you the missing DLLs. Then use or 'cygcheck -p /bin/foo.dll'

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

On 2010-04-22 01:37, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: On 4/21/2010 11:17 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: 'cygcheck montage' and 'cygcheck convert' should tell you the missing DLLs. Then use or 'cygcheck -p /bin/foo.dll' to find the package to

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" writes: > On 4/21/2010 11:17 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: [snipped 14 lines] > 'cygcheck montage' and 'cygcheck convert' should tell you the missing DLLs. > Then use or 'cygcheck -p /bin/foo.dll' to > find the package to install. If I had t

Re: ImageMagick shared libraries missing?

On 4/21/2010 11:17 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: After updating through setup, the montage and convert binaries complain of missing shared libraries. $ montage /usr/bin/montage.exe: error while loading shared libraries: ?: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory $ convert /

Re: ImageMagick not working on Vista/Server 2008 64-bit

On Jun 26 14:51, Brian Ford wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Jun 20 03:36, Barry Kelly wrote: > > > I have a Windows Server 2008 64-bit install, and I've found that > > > ImageMagick cannot convert a simple JPG into a BMP, or resize a JPG. > > > > > > Steps to reprodu

Re: ImageMagick not working on Vista/Server 2008 64-bit

On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 20 03:36, Barry Kelly wrote: > > I have a Windows Server 2008 64-bit install, and I've found that > > ImageMagick cannot convert a simple JPG into a BMP, or resize a JPG. > > > > Steps to reproduce: > > > > * Start mspaint > > * Create 200x200p

Re: ImageMagick not working on Vista/Server 2008 64-bit

On Jun 20 03:36, Barry Kelly wrote: > I have a Windows Server 2008 64-bit install, and I've found that > ImageMagick cannot convert a simple JPG into a BMP, or resize a JPG. > > Steps to reproduce: > > * Start mspaint > * Create 200x200px white image > * Save as test.jpg > * Try this command: 'co

Re: ImageMagick not working on Vista/Server 2008 64-bit

Brian Ford wrote: > Isn't the efault handler supposed to catch this anyway? Absolutely, but maybe it isn't working right what with all the modifications and enhancements to SEH in recent windows kernels. If you want a hope of debugging this, build yourself a custom DLL with CFLAGS="-g -O0" a

Re: ImageMagick not working on Vista/Server 2008 64-bit

On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Barry Kelly wrote: > I have a Windows Server 2008 64-bit install, and I've found that > ImageMagick cannot convert a simple JPG into a BMP, or resize a JPG. > > Steps to reproduce: > > * Start mspaint > * Create 200x200px white image > * Save as test.jpg > * Try this command:

Re: ImageMagick "display" and "convert" fail with a Visual C++ runtime error

Igor Peshansky wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Dmitry Golovaty wrote: Thanks, Igor. PATH is usually processed left-to-right. As an alternative to what Brian suggested, simply prepending C:\cygwin\bin to the PATH should work. C:\cygwin\bin has been in the PATH all the time; the pr

Re: ImageMagick "display" and "convert" fail with a Visual C++ runtime error

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Dmitry Golovaty wrote: > Thanks, Igor. > > > PATH is usually processed left-to-right. As an alternative to what > > Brian suggested, simply prepending C:\cygwin\bin to the PATH should > > work. > > C:\cygwin\bin has been in the PATH all the time; the problem seems to > have b

Re: ImageMagick "display" and "convert" fail with a Visual C++ runtime error

Thanks, Igor. PATH is usually processed left-to-right. As an alternative to what Brian suggested, simply prepending C:\cygwin\bin to the PATH should work. C:\cygwin\bin has been in the PATH all the time; the problem seems to have been that the PATH statement contained a MATLAB directory some

Re: ImageMagick "display" and "convert" fail with a Visual C++ runtime error

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Dmitry Golovaty wrote: > Thanks - the culprit is the MATLAB entry > > /cygdrive/c/Program Files/MATLAB/R2007a/bin/win32 > > in the path; removing it fixes the problem ... is there way to pluck > it out automatically (e.g. in .bashrc) when the path is imported from > Windows at

Re: ImageMagick "display" and "convert" fail with a Visual C++ runtime error

Thanks again - everything works now. Dmitry Brian Dessent wrote: Dmitry Golovaty wrote: Thanks - the culprit is the MATLAB entry /cygdrive/c/Program Files/MATLAB/R2007a/bin/win32 in the path; removing it fixes the problem ... is there way to pluck it out automatically (e.g. in .bashrc) w

Re: ImageMagick "display" and "convert" fail with a Visual C++ runtime error

Dmitry Golovaty wrote: > Thanks - the culprit is the MATLAB entry > > /cygdrive/c/Program Files/MATLAB/R2007a/bin/win32 > > in the path; removing it fixes the problem ... is there way to pluck > it out automatically (e.g. in .bashrc) when the path is imported from > Windows at Cygwin start-up? T

Re: ImageMagick "display" and "convert" fail with a Visual C++ runtime error

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library > > Runtime Error! > > Program C:\cygwin\bin\convert.exe > > R6034 > An application has made an attempt to load the C runtime library > incorrectly. > > Is there anything that I can do to fix this? Something sounds quite broken i

Re: ImageMagick Cygwin Port

On 11/10/06, Volker Quetschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Having said that, I don't appreciate personal mail with regard to cygwin packages. Please use the mailing list, I'm reading it. Bitte schön > I tried to build ImageMagick recently and was successfull for all but > "perl-Image-Magick".

Re: ImageMagick Cygwin Port

djh wrote: > Volker, > thanks for your efforts with the ImageMagick port for cygwin. You're welcome :) Having said that, I don't appreciate personal mail with regard to cygwin packages. Please use the mailing list, I'm reading it. > I tried to build ImageMagick recently and was successfull for

Re: ImageMagick needs old X dlls - lyx/XmGrace fail because ImageMagick doesn't work

On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:32:03PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >This is merely a reminder that some packages fail because the current >Xorg version removed some dlls that are needed by ImageMagick. > >This is not a new issue, see here: > >

RE: Imagemagick / GraphicsMagick on a brand new install

As was observed (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2006-05/msg00034.html), this seems to depend on new xorg*-6.8.99.901-1. --- Oh yes, how embarassing! I didn't know there was such a thing as GraphicsMagick until today, so I didn't google for it. I rolled back my X packages, and it all works

Re: Imagemagick / GraphicsMagick on a brand new install

Peter Pimley wrote: > If I run ImageMagick's convert, mogrify or identify tools (and possibly > others, I've not tried), they silently fail As was observed (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2006-05/msg00034.html), this seems to depend on new xorg*-6.8.99.901-1. Perhaps you can use Netpbm, in

  1   2   >