Linda Walsh wrote:
I'm 2500 miles from this machine at the moment, so I'm not exactly
sure what you would see in add/remove programs. I suspect your list
is correct, but you'ld also see Virtual Studio (which you probably missed
due to the missing above).
"At the moment?"
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
Linda Walsh wrote:
Hi, I don't claim to know what is going on, but I'm
using a dual-core system and haven't noticed the problems you are having,
but my processors are Intel Dual Core. That shouldn't make a difference
I wouldn't think.
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
1) Window
On 5/16/07, Christopher Faylor
wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:32:10PM -0600, Morgan Gangwere wrote:
>one of them (for Intel Mac processors with Dual Cores in some stores)
>there was a driver that would not allow Cygwin to talk to the device
>like UNIX does because it did not have "Hyperviser"
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:32:10PM -0600, Morgan Gangwere wrote:
>one of them (for Intel Mac processors with Dual Cores in some stores)
>there was a driver that would not allow Cygwin to talk to the device
>like UNIX does because it did not have "Hyperviser" mode access -
>special access to let the
On 5/16/07, Oliver Walsh wrote:
>>I'm wondering -- just as a data point, if you tried building on a
>>dual-core, but setting all of your cygwin processes to run on one
core?
I used imagecfg.exe to set the affinity for all of the cygwin exes. It
sorted out a lot of problems (pthread errors IIRC
>>I'm wondering -- just as a data point, if you tried building on a
>>dual-core, but setting all of your cygwin processes to run on one
core?
I used imagecfg.exe to set the affinity for all of the cygwin exes. It
sorted out a lot of problems (pthread errors IIRC) I was hitting on a
2-way dualcore
Linda Walsh wrote:
Hi, I don't claim to know what is going on, but I'm
using a dual-core system and haven't noticed the problems you are having,
but my processors are Intel Dual Core. That shouldn't make a difference
I wouldn't think.
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
1) Windows XP, fully updated; 2
Hi, I don't claim to know what is going on, but I'm
using a dual-core system and haven't noticed the problems you are having,
but my processors are Intel Dual Core. That shouldn't make a difference
I wouldn't think.
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
1) Windows XP, fully updated; 2) Visual Studio .NET Pr
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
[snip]
Don't be too sure. The configuration I described also has an Intel
PRO/1000 MT with driver from Intel (via Microsoft).
Another experiment I didn't mention is I loaded the same software stack
on to another machine with a single core processor (Shuttle FX41). It
Rene Berber wrote:
> My problem, I think, is a bad network driver... or at least it takes
too long for it to "start up". The network card is surely completely
different from what you use (an Intel PRO/1000 MT with driver from Intel.
Don't be too sure. The configuration I described also has
Good day, all,
Still no luck trying out Larry's Suggestion... my
system is a bit edgy and unstable at the moment... is
gonna be a long re-installation ... :< fortunately I
am trying this @ home and only have to live with my
wife's complaints.
After reading more of the current and past postings,
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
I'm attempting to use cygwin to provide the UNIX-like build environment
to build Java SE on a DualCore system.
Relevant configuration details:
AMD X2 5200+
[snip]
With this configuration, I get random "can not fork: Resource
temporarily unavailable" errors when tryi
I think the following sad story should shed a little light on this issue.
I'm attempting to use cygwin to provide the UNIX-like build environment
to build Java SE on a DualCore system.
Relevant configuration details:
AMD X2 5200+
Asus M2NPV-VM
2 Gb ECC memory (std. clocks)
I'm worki
I'm running Cygwin, Windows XP professiona 2002 SP2, and Norton AntiVirus
(with the firewall turned off) without problems on an Intel Core2 Duo 2.13
GHz system.
--
William Sutton
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:07:20AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrot
David Arnstein wrote:
Is there a particular software firewall that does not interfere with
Cygwin?
That's a bit of an open-ended question..
I use Sunbelt (formerly Kerio) personal firewall. I turn off most of
its features HIPS, NIPS, ... and Cygwin applications work OK for me,
most of the ti
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:07:20AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:54:36PM +0800, Chee Kiang Goh wrote:
> >Looking forward nevertheless to a better co-existence solution with
> >WindowXP/DualCoreCPU. This feature had been the primary reason why I
> >stick to cygwin ov
- Forwarded message from Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
PTC, although, you have to wonder why we'd have to accommodate virus
checkers or firewalls, which are supposed to be unobtrusive.
- End forwarded message -
Is there a particular software firewall that does not interf
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:54:36PM +0800, Chee Kiang Goh wrote:
>Looking forward nevertheless to a better co-existence solution with
>WindowXP/DualCoreCPU. This feature had been the primary reason why I
>stick to cygwin over the years :>
FYI, there is no better coexistence solution contemplated.
Good day, Larry,
Will give it a try. Thanks!
This setting will kinda leave me abit unprotected from
the rest of the internet... :P Shall be offline when
trying...
Looking forward nevertheless to a better co-existence
solution with WindowXP/DualCoreCPU. This feature had
been the primary reason
On 05/09/2007, Chee Kiang Goh wrote:
> Searched and tried several suggestions on the mailing list(replaced with
> latest dev version of cygwin1.dll, base dist, rebase, make -j1, stop the
> zone alarm, avira's antivir etc). Always, I get messages similar to the
> below example with messages about
20 matches
Mail list logo
