-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to NightStrike on 9/9/2008 7:08 AM:
>>> "... building where objdir is a subdirectory of srcdir is unsupported."
>>
>> I have been building gcc like that (and also in a completely separate
>> directory) for many years, but if this officially u
NightStrike wrote on 09 September 2008 14:09:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Christopher Faylor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:17:16PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> Christopher Faylor wrote on 08 September 2008 22:48:
>>>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:43:37PM +,
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Christopher Faylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:17:16PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote on 08 September 2008 22:48:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:43:37PM +, Jay wrote:
You can build gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 just f
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:17:16PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote on 08 September 2008 22:48:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:43:37PM +, Jay wrote:
>>> You can build gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 just fine from the existing Cygwin gcc
>>> 3.x package.
>>>
>>> The error also /appeared
Christopher Faylor wrote on 08 September 2008 22:48:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:43:37PM +, Jay wrote:
>> You can build gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 just fine from the existing Cygwin gcc
>> 3.x package.
>>
>> The error also /appeared/ to have the object directory under the source
>> directory. Don
Jay wrote on 08 September 2008 22:44:
> If you /really/ want to go through intermediate versions,
> then just remove -disable-bootstrap.
I'd highly recommend always building a full bootstrap, but of course it does
take longer.
> Or build twice, should be about the same thing:
I wouldn't
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:43:37PM +, Jay wrote:
>You can build gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 just fine from the existing Cygwin
>gcc 3.x package.
>
>The error also /appeared/ to have the object directory under the source
>directory. Don't do that.
Huh? There's no reason not to do this. I do it all o
You can build gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 just fine from the existing Cygwin gcc 3.x
package.
The error also /appeared/ to have the object directory under the source
directory. Don't do that.
I use roughly:
mkdir /obj/gcc.1
cd /obj/gcc.1
/src/gcc/configure -disable-nls -disable-boo
Thank you, Tatsuro Matsuoka,
Following Brian Dessent's advice, I have reinstalled Cygwin in binary
(Unix) file mode. Under that rendition of Cygwin, the gcc 4.3.2 build
ran to completion. The resulting GCC looks promising, although I have
not yet tested it extensively.
Best,
Werner
P.S.: My apo
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> Hello Werner Wothke
>
> My suggestin is non-sense from logical sense but is a success story to build
> gcc-4.3.2.
>
> I have tried with gcc-3.4.4-3 on cygwin, the same error appeared.
> I have compliled from gcc 4.3.2 (only C, C++, Fortran) from gcc 4.3.1, there
> occu
Hello Werner Wothke
My suggestin is non-sense from logical sense but is a success story to build
gcc-4.3.2.
I have tried with gcc-3.4.4-3 on cygwin, the same error appeared.
I have compliled from gcc 4.3.2 (only C, C++, Fortran) from gcc 4.3.1, there
occured no problems.
To my knowledge 4.2
Werner Wothke wrote:
> $ make
> [ -f stage_final ] || echo stage3 > stage_final
> make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/gcc-4.3.2/Destination'
> -bubble'. Stop.rule to make target `stage3
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/c/gcc-4.3.2/Destination'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
The overlapped
12 matches
Mail list logo
