On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Brian Ford wrote:
> That's only half of it. You need to set the
> IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE flag in the executable's COFF header.
Let me check I've got clear what to do: I need to
download the source code for the cygwin ld package
apply the patch of 6th May, 2
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Ford
> Sent: 30 June 2004 18:31
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > The virtual memory available to a process is 2GB under NT.
> I see two
> > possible workarounds:
> >
> > - There's a way to start NT with a "
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dan Hatton
> Sent: 30 June 2004 16:34
> I've now added " /3GB" to the end of the last line of my
> boot.ini, making
> the complete file:
>
> [boot loader]
> timeout=30
> default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS
> [operatin
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > The virtual memory available to a process is 2GB under NT. I see two
> > possible workarounds:
> >
> > - There's a way to start NT with a "/3gb" switch from boot.ini which
> > allows to get 3GB of virtua
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> The virtual memory available to a process is 2GB under NT. I see two
> possible workarounds:
>
> - There's a way to start NT with a "/3gb" switch from boot.ini which
> allows to get 3GB of virtual memory per process. Dunno if that's
> available
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Dan Hatton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Tim Prince wrote:
>
> > cygwin doesn't emulate a 64-bit OS. Did you try setting up XP with /3GB to
> > see whether that would give another 1 GB, or check the archives for any
> > reports on such an attempt?
>
> I've now added " /3GB" t
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Tim Prince wrote:
> cygwin doesn't emulate a 64-bit OS. Did you try setting up XP with /3GB to
> see whether that would give another 1 GB, or check the archives for any
> reports on such an attempt?
I've now added " /3GB" to the end of the last line of my boot.ini, making
th
On Jun 30 14:54, Dan Hatton wrote:
>
> I'm using CYGWIN_NT-5.1, under XP Pro.
>
> I've set my heap_chunk_in_mb registry key to a very large value (10240
> decimal,) because I'm doing some RAM-hungry numerical calculations.
>
> I have enough space to do this (Control Panel->System reports 12 GB o
At 06:54 AM 6/30/2004, Dan Hatton wrote:
I'm using CYGWIN_NT-5.1, under XP Pro.
I've set my heap_chunk_in_mb registry key to a very large value (10240
decimal,) because I'm doing some RAM-hungry numerical calculations.
I have enough space to do this (Control Panel->System reports 12 GB of
virtual
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dan Hatton
> Sent: 30 June 2004 14:55
> I'm using CYGWIN_NT-5.1, under XP Pro.
>
> I've set my heap_chunk_in_mb registry key to a very large value (10240
> decimal,) because I'm doing some RAM-hungry numerical calculations.
>
> I hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
