Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> From `mad sed`:
>
> -u, --unbuffered
>
> load minimal amounts of data from the input files and flush the output
> buffers more often
>
> If you add the -u option, sed will buffer less and write to the pipe more
> often. I would guess this isn't the de
Sven Severus wrote:
> Question 1:
> Why do I face different behaviour with "cat -n" and "sed s/e/E/g"?
> Are there cygwin related reasons?
> Which behaviour should I expect (I know there are buffering
> mechanisms for stdout when not connected to a tty, so I tend to
> say the buffering behaviour is
2 matches
Mail list logo
