Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:20:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the package
selection step.
I haven't seen it, but it certainly sounds wrong for a "wizard"-style
window to change its size whe
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:32:27PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Andy Koppe wrote:
By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the
package
selection step.
>>> I haven't seen it, but it certainly sounds wrong for a "wizard"-style
>>> wind
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 01:51:57PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>I find it useful as well...it was just a little startling the first time
>it expanded to full screen.
Has anyone noticed that setup.exe now prints to the screen as well
as displaying dialog boxes? So, in theory you can do this:
setup --hel
Hi All...
>
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:20:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the
package
selection step.
>>>
>>> I haven't seen it, but it certainly sounds wrong for a "wizard"-style
>>> window to change its size
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:20:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> > By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the
>> > package
>> > selection step.
>>
>> I haven't seen it, but it certainly sounds wrong for a "wizard"-style
>> window to change its size when you press the
> > By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the package
> > selection step.
>
> I haven't seen it, but it certainly sounds wrong for a "wizard"-style
> window to change its size when you press the Next button.
Hm, I always think it's kind of handy. Also that it changes b
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:32:27PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Andy Koppe wrote:
>>> By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the package
>>> selection step.
>>
>> I haven't seen it, but it certainly sounds wrong for a "wizard"-style
>> window to change its size when you press
Andy Koppe wrote:
>> By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the package
>> selection step.
>
> I haven't seen it, but it certainly sounds wrong for a "wizard"-style
> window to change its size when you press the Next button.
This is my other nomination for the user int
On May 7 07:26, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> > This -47 release is accompanied by a new setup-1.7.exe installer,
> > version number is 2.617.
>
> I get consistent crashes sometimes after install (and before running
> postinstall
> scripts?). Exception code
> By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the package
> selection step.
I haven't seen it, but it certainly sounds wrong for a "wizard"-style
window to change its size when you press the Next button.
> An option somewhere to disable it would be nice. :)
No, it wouldn't.
Matthias Andree gmx.de> writes:
> > By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the
> > package
> > selection step. An option somewhere to disable it would be nice. :)
>
> But that's actually a useful feature. The default size used to be way too
> small.
It's just that
Am 07.05.2009, 09:26 Uhr, schrieb Magnus Holmgren :
By the way, I don't like that setup maximizes the window when on the
package
selection step. An option somewhere to disable it would be nice. :)
But that's actually a useful feature. The default size used to be way too
small.
--
Matthia
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> This -47 release is accompanied by a new setup-1.7.exe installer,
> version number is 2.617.
I get consistent crashes sometimes after install (and before running postinstall
scripts?). Exception code is 0xc0fd (stack overflow? Fault offset is
0x000430ac
Dave Korn wrote:
" Ken Brown wrote:
" > On 5/6/2009 9:25 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
" >> This -47 release is accompanied by a new setup-1.7.exe installer,
" >> version number is 2.617.
" >>
" >> This new installer adds the capability to search for package names in a
" >> search field, top-left in
Thrall, Bryan wrote:
> Sounds good to me. BTW, thanks to everyone who worked on the search
> feature, it is very nice :)
Yes, much kudos (and a gold star please?) are due to Andrew Punch for giving
us this long-missed feature.
> My only (minor) complaint is it lacks a button to clear its conten
Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:33 AM:
> Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 5/6/2009 9:25 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> This -47 release is accompanied by a new setup-1.7.exe installer,
version
>>> number is 2.617.
>>>
>>> This new installer adds the capability to search for package names
in
On 5/6/2009 11:33 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
Maybe it would suffice if we put some kind of visual indication in the
chooser that there were excluded packages? Say we added a dummy entry at the
end of the list that couldn't be clicked on and that just said
[ ... more packages filtered out by sea
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 5/6/2009 9:25 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> This -47 release is accompanied by a new setup-1.7.exe installer,
>> version number is 2.617.
>>
>> This new installer adds the capability to search for package names in a
>> search field, top-left in the package selection window.
>
On 5/6/2009 9:25 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
This -47 release is accompanied by a new setup-1.7.exe installer,
version number is 2.617.
This new installer adds the capability to search for package names in a
search field, top-left in the package selection window.
There's one potential pitfall
19 matches
Mail list logo
