On 2019-06-04 22:26, Houder wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:04:16, Vince Rice wrote:
>> It's cygport, he doesn't have to know about compiling C. ...
> Vince, this utter nonsense, and you know it!
He hopefully should not, just rebuilding and reconfiguring an existing source
package, with current to
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:04:16, Vince Rice wrote:
> It's cygport, he doesn't have to know about compiling C. ...
Vince, this utter nonsense, and you know it!
Henri
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http:
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:04:16, Vince Rice wrote:
It's cygport, he doesn't have to know about compiling C. He has to know about
running a one-line cygport command.
This just seems purposefully ignorant. How exactly is he suppose to modify the C
source to address the problem and recompile, if he do
> On Jun 4, 2019, at 5:55 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
>
> Easy compared to what, assembly?
Easy compared to hard.
> He shows some domain knowledge of OpenSSL, but where are you getting that he
> knows about compiling C?
It's cygport, he doesn't have to know about compiling C. He has to know about
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:25:48, Brian Inglis wrote:
I am encouraging and offering the poster a way to solve their problem, after
providing some possible reasons for dropping support from some ECs.
Rebuilding a Cygwin package from source using cygport is a relatively easy
task.
Easy compared to wha
On 2019-06-03 16:36, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:35:29, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> You can easily rebuild the package yourself with the cygport utility, to
>> check
>> that works, then change the build config to include the Brainpool ECs, and
>> rebuild the way you want it.
>
> Please
Hi Guys,
Thanks for your feedback.
I have recompile the openssl package with Cygport and this has allowed
me to point out the differences between the OpenSSL mainline and the
Cygwin pacakge.
Actually the Cygwin package follow the spec from Fedora package where
it has been decided to remove some p
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:35:29, Brian Inglis wrote:
You can easily rebuild the package yourself with the cygport utility, to check
that works, then change the build config to include the Brainpool ECs, and
rebuild the way you want it.
Please do not presume someones technical prowess. It might be e
On 2019-06-03 06:09, Benjamin Baratte wrote:
> I would like to understand why the OpenSSL 1.1.1b package only includes the
> NIST EC curves support ?
> I'm basically try to use brainpool curves and I have noticed that the
> package 1.1.1b does not includes these curves and more generally only
> inc
Hi Cygwin team,
I would like to understand why the OpenSSL 1.1.1b package only includes the
NIST EC curves support ?
I'm basically try to use brainpool curves and I have noticed that the
package 1.1.1b does not includes these curves and more generally only
includes NIST curves
$ openssl version
O
10 matches
Mail list logo
