On 7/14/2011 8:51 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
That's too bad, I'll try MinGW.
I mean, I'll try MSVC.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.c
On 7/13/2011 5:59 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
True. If your goal was to get down to 1 executable that contains all
that is necessary to run, then you'll never get there.
That's too bad, I'll try MinGW.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http:/
On 7/13/2011 4:36 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
On 7/13/2011 3:54 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
And I had to pass x11 to CONFIG in the project file. Now it works!
Perhaps it is pointless having a static Qt library after all because the
executable will depend on other libraries that are dynamic:
...
T
On 7/13/2011 3:54 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
And I had to pass x11 to CONFIG in the project file. Now it works!
Perhaps it is pointless having a static Qt library after all because the
executable will depend on other libraries that are dynamic:
...
cygICE-6.dll => /usr/bin/cygICE-6.dll (?)
cyg
On 7/13/2011 1:16 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Needless to say, our Qt includes patches which fix all these errors. I
have yet to push these upstream, so in the meantime, please direct Qt
bug reports to these lists.
As I mentioned here:
http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-20342?focuse
On 7/13/2011 10:36 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
I failed to see any "-no-example" option.
Ok it's: -nomake example
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: htt
On 7/13/2011 1:16 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
The other major distributions don't do this, and there's a reason why:
a static Qt build is different from a shared one, and you can't install
them both in the same place.
Well you just have to rename the static library.
The Qt build is very con
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 22:53 -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> On 7/12/2011 10:41 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >
> > You don't need to distribute the Qt DLLs, just have your users get them
> > from the distro.
>
> I meant some people would like to distribute an executable to systems
> with no Cygwin
On 7/12/2011 10:41 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
You don't need to distribute the Qt DLLs, just have your users get them
from the distro.
I meant some people would like to distribute an executable to systems
with no Cygwin or Qt installed.
False. While some plugins can be builtin to the li
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:23 -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> On 7/12/2011 2:43 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >
> > Why? A static Qt means no plugins, which is pretty worthless.
>
> Distributing a standalone executable is much simpler than distributing
> an archive full of DLLs.
You don't need to
On 7/12/2011 1:36 PM, Marco atzeri wrote:
use the search functionality
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=qmake
see details of libQtCore4-devel
That's strange I thought I had installed all Qt4 components and
qmake-qt4.exe wasn't anywhere in the PATH. Sorry for the confusion.
On 7/12/2011 7:15 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
On 7/12/2011 1:53 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 21:03 -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote:
What about qmake of Qt4? This is not installed.
http://cygwin.com/packages/
I don't see qmake for Qt4. Besides, qt3to4.exe and many other binarie
On 7/12/2011 2:43 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Why? A static Qt means no plugins, which is pretty worthless.
Distributing a standalone executable is much simpler than distributing
an archive full of DLLs. Plugins are needed only for drivers, fancy
fonts, etc. not for a standard application
On 7/12/2011 1:53 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 21:03 -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote:
What about qmake of Qt4? This is not installed.
http://cygwin.com/packages/
I don't see qmake for Qt4. Besides, qt3to4.exe and many other binaries
are not installed.
--
Problem report
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 20:33 -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> Qt Creator is not part of Cygwin?
Not currently, but it is available in Ports.
> Furthermore having a static version of the Qt library would save
> everybody a lot of trouble
Why? A static Qt means no plugins, which is pretty worthless
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 21:03 -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> What about qmake of Qt4? This is not installed.
http://cygwin.com/packages/
Yaakov
Cygwin/X
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.c
On 7/11/2011 8:33 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
Hi,
Qt Creator is not part of Cygwin?
What about qmake of Qt4? This is not installed.
-Phil
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.htm
Hi,
Qt Creator is not part of Cygwin?
Furthermore having a static version of the Qt library would save
everybody a lot of trouble (both Qt3 and Qt4).
-Phil
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://
18 matches
Mail list logo
