ilak1008 wrote:
In fact, my script process a file about 5 sec under SFU while under Cygwin,
it takes about 30 sec or longer. I wish to continue using Cygwin.
Therefore, is there a better way to make the processing faster without the
need of optimizing my script?
Strange. While
* ilak1008 (Mon, 28 May 2007 06:16:33 -0700 (PDT))
> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > * ilak1008 (Mon, 28 May 2007 00:17:25 -0700 (PDT))
> >> I tried running a script using both SFU & Cygwin. I noticed that
> >> processing a
> >> script in Cygwin is a lot slower as compared to using SFU.
> >
> > Yes, abo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to ilak1008 on 5/28/2007 7:16 AM:
> In fact, my script process a file about 5 sec under SFU while under Cygwin,
> it takes about 30 sec or longer. I wish to continue using Cygwin.
Cygwin is an emulation layer. By its very nature, it is in
er without the
need of optimizing my script?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Processing-A-Script-Too-Slow-under-Cygwin-tf3826478.html#a10836107
Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscr
* ilak1008 (Mon, 28 May 2007 00:17:25 -0700 (PDT))
> I tried running a script using both SFU & Cygwin. I noticed that processing a
> script in Cygwin is a lot slower as compared to using SFU.
Yes, about two times slower is reasonable.
> Is there a way to make the processing faster?
Yes, profile
I tried running a script using both SFU & Cygwin. I noticed that processing a
script in Cygwin is a lot slower as compared to using SFU. Is there a way to
make the processing faster?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Processing-A-Script-Too-Slow-under-Cygwin-tf3826478.
6 matches
Mail list logo