Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2006, mwoehlke wrote:
Igor Peshansky wrote:
Hmm, weird -- for me the foreground color of the icons is *always*
black.
Unfortunately, a: this isn't the case for me, and b: as you've so
astutely pointed out, if it was that would still be problematic :-). (In
Brian Dessent wrote:
mwoehlke wrote:
A while back I posted about the colors in setup.exe. I noticed that the
text background color is fixed but that there is still a problem with
the tree structure; specifically, the clickable [+] and [-] icons are,
on my colors, effectively invisible. On some o
On Mon, 22 May 2006, mwoehlke wrote:
Igor Peshansky wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2006, mwoehlke wrote:
> > A while back I posted about the colors in setup.exe. I noticed that the
> > text background color is fixed but that there is still a problem with
> > the tree structure; specifically, the clicka
mwoehlke wrote:
> A while back I posted about the colors in setup.exe. I noticed that the
> text background color is fixed but that there is still a problem with
> the tree structure; specifically, the clickable [+] and [-] icons are,
> on my colors, effectively invisible. On some other color sche
mwoehlke wrote:
Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2006, mwoehlke wrote:
A while back I posted about the colors in setup.exe. I noticed that the
text background color is fixed but that there is still a problem with
the tree structure; specifically, the clickable [+] and [-] icons are,
on my c
Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2006, mwoehlke wrote:
A while back I posted about the colors in setup.exe. I noticed that the
text background color is fixed but that there is still a problem with
the tree structure; specifically, the clickable [+] and [-] icons are,
on my colors, effectivel
On Mon, 22 May 2006, mwoehlke wrote:
> A while back I posted about the colors in setup.exe. I noticed that the
> text background color is fixed but that there is still a problem with
> the tree structure; specifically, the clickable [+] and [-] icons are,
> on my colors, effectively invisible. On
A while back I posted about the colors in setup.exe. I noticed that the
text background color is fixed but that there is still a problem with
the tree structure; specifically, the clickable [+] and [-] icons are,
on my colors, effectively invisible. On some other color schemes I
tried, they *ar
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 07:22, Brian Ford wrote:
> I think he and I just want clicking on all->install to not continually
> download those two packages. I didn't ever hand select them to begin
> with. I just get them continually for "free".
Ah, well thats deliberate behaviour. Hmm, I'll think abou
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 07:10, David A. Cobb wrote:
> > The first time I saw it, I explicitly selected "Install" the gcc-core.
> > However, it keeps showing up as something to be installed.
> > It still shows with the "new or omitted" packages view.
> > My
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
> Brian Ford wrote:
> >On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
> >>I couldn't find this in the archives, but the two packages gcc-core &
> >>gcc-testsuite, which are distinguished by being source-only,
> >>never get registered as "installed." Setup has now
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 07:10, David A. Cobb wrote:
> >
> Well, I read that. It doesn't sound like the same thing.
>
> The first time I saw it, I explicitly selected "Install" the gcc-core.
> However, it keeps showing up as something to be installed.
> It still shows with the "new or omitted" pa
Brian Ford wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
I couldn't find this in the archives, but the two packages gcc-core &
gcc-testsuite, which are distinguished by being source-only,
never get registered as "installed." Setup has now re-installed them
about 6 times. I know, I don't ne
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
> I couldn't find this in the archives, but the two packages gcc-core &
> gcc-testsuite, which are distinguished by being source-only,
> never get registered as "installed." Setup has now re-installed them
> about 6 times. I know, I don't need to select t
I couldn't find this in the archives, but the two packages gcc-core &
gcc-testsuite, which are distinguished by being source-only,
never get registered as "installed." Setup has now re-installed them
about 6 times. I know, I don't need to select them; however,
I figured there was some likelihoo
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:22:35AM -0400, Rodrigo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Problem 1.
> I have notice that setup fails sometimes in some mirrors (I use the
> downloading mode). I have found that some mirrors have the following policy:
> If the connection is slow they close the connectio
Hello!
Here some comments about setup.exe
Problem 1.
I have notice that setup fails sometimes in some mirrors (I use the
downloading mode). I have found that some mirrors have the following policy:
If the connection is slow they close the connection after some number of
bytes
is downloaded. If
17 matches
Mail list logo
