On Monday 13 May 02, Jason Tishler writes:
> > Jason Tishler has already suggested a possible cause for this problem:
> > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00639.html
>
> Should the above become a FAQ? At least, until cygipc goes away?
Yes, I suppose so. Thanks for bringing it to my atten
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 09:28:49PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 03:03:47PM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> >I'm getting a bunch of sytax errors when I compile the latest cvs tree.
> >Although I am aware that the tree is sometimes broken, I thought I'd call
> >attenti
> Jason Tishler has already suggested a possible cause for this problem:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00639.html
Sorry, a bit of a brain fart, I realized this too late...
> Assuming that there is a typo in the sources is illogical since
> snapshots are built from the sources on a re
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 03:03:47PM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>I'm getting a bunch of sytax errors when I compile the latest cvs tree.
>Although I am aware that the tree is sometimes broken, I thought I'd call
>attention to it. I'm investigating the issue right now, but I don't know
>how long
> I'm getting a bunch of sytax errors when I compile the latest cvs tree.
> Although I am aware that the tree is sometimes broken, I thought I'd call
> attention to it. I'm investigating the issue right now, but I don't know
> how long I can spend on it. Anyhow, I am using the latest cygwin inst
Hi,
I'm getting a bunch of sytax errors when I compile the latest cvs tree.
Although I am aware that the tree is sometimes broken, I thought I'd call
attention to it. I'm investigating the issue right now, but I don't know
how long I can spend on it. Anyhow, I am using the latest cygwin instal
6 matches
Mail list logo
