Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > Achim Gratz writes:
> > > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > >> I just explained that in a reply an the cygwin-apps list:
> > >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-11/msg00075.html
> > >>
> > >> I applied a patch to setup which should fix the issue.
> > >
> > > The patch W
On Nov 19 09:30, Harry G McGavran Jr wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
> > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> >> I just explained that in a reply an the cygwin-apps list:
> >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-11/msg00075.html
> >>
> >> I applied a patch to setup which should fix the issue.
> >
> > The patc
Achim Gratz writes:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> I just explained that in a reply an the cygwin-apps list:
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-11/msg00075.html
>>
>> I applied a patch to setup which should fix the issue.
>
> The patch WJFFM.
>
But in line 266 of main.cc set_cout() is still c
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> I just explained that in a reply an the cygwin-apps list:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-11/msg00075.html
>
> I applied a patch to setup which should fix the issue.
The patch WJFFM. :-)
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda
Harry G McGavran Jr writes:
> int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
The entry point in setup.exe is WinMain, which has a different signature
and entry point. The use of __argv ties into the actual RTC entry point
of WinMainCRTStartup and gets populated on startup. If indeed on one of
your
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>I just explained that in a reply an the cygwin-apps list:
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-11/msg00075.html>
>
>I applied a patch to setup which should fix the issue.
>
I grabbed the latest source (which has the nt_fopen in it)
and built it without the argv patch, bu
On Nov 17 18:54, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Christopher Faylor writes:
> > I appreciate your looking at the source code but given what you changed,
> > I don't understand how what you did would fix that. If your changes
> > were really necessary then something would have to be seriously wrong
> > with m
Christopher Faylor writes:
> I appreciate your looking at the source code but given what you changed,
> I don't understand how what you did would fix that. If your changes
> were really necessary then something would have to be seriously wrong
> with mscvrt handling of argv strings. That points t
>On 11/12/2013 10:54 AM, Harry G McGavran Jr wrote:
>> On only one of my Windows 7 machines the latest setup-x86.exe
>> works but always exits with an Access Violation.
>>
>> So, I downloaded the source to setup and built it.
>>
>> But in order to make the build work, I had to remove -Werror
>>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:54:03AM -0700, Harry G McGavran Jr wrote:
>On only one of my Windows 7 machines the latest setup-x86.exe
>works but always exits with an Access Violation.
I appreciate your looking at the source code but given what you changed,
I don't understand how what you did would f
On only one of my Windows 7 machines the latest setup-x86.exe
works but always exits with an Access Violation.
So, I downloaded the source to setup and built it.
But in order to make the build work, I had to remove -Werror
from the Makefile and add a definition for ARRAYSIZE to main.cc.
The fix
11 matches
Mail list logo
