On 5/30/2011 5:12 PM, Juanjo wrote:
> It seems I did not express myself properly. Code is compiled on the fly.
> DLLs do not survive beyond program execution. This is a dynamic language
> (Common Lisp btw) and functions are compiled and run and consumed
> quickly. Calling rebase for each invocation
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
>
> Please calm down.
I am calm :-) I just happen to like exclamation signs.
> I guess I shouldn't have said the "doesn't really work" and stuck with
> "of limited utility". fds attached with cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd are
> not fully functional.
You st
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:39:13AM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>On 5/30/11 10:46 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 07:34:27AM +, Juanjo wrote:
>>> Christopher Faylor writes:
Unfortunately, cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd doesn't really work. Cygwin
needs to know
On 5/30/11 10:46 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 07:34:27AM +, Juanjo wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor writes:
>>> Unfortunately, cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd doesn't really work. Cygwin
>>> needs to know the type of handle it is attaching in order to set up the
>>> correct t
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 07:34:27AM +, Juanjo wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>>Unfortunately, cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd doesn't really work. Cygwin
>>needs to know the type of handle it is attaching in order to set up the
>>correct type of file handler. Since it doesn't do that the handle
On 30/05/2011 3:34 AM, Juanjo wrote:
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
Unfortunately, cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd doesn't really work. Cygwin
needs to know the type of handle it is attaching in order to set up
the correct type of file handler. Since it doesn't do that the handle
is of li
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
>
> Unfortunately, cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd doesn't really work. Cygwin
> needs to know the type of handle it is attaching in order to set up
> the correct type of file handler. Since it doesn't do that the handle
> is of limited utility.
If this was tr
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:35:03AM +, Juanjo wrote:
>Actually there are two different problems related to my implementation of a
>Common Lisp environment, ecl (http://ecls.sf.net)
>
>The first one has to do with fork() not working, due to the fact that ECL
>injects DLLs using dlopen() and they
Actually there are two different problems related to my implementation of a
Common Lisp environment, ecl (http://ecls.sf.net)
The first one has to do with fork() not working, due to the fact that ECL
injects DLLs using dlopen() and they are then improperly loaded. I have seen in
the mailing list t
9 matches
Mail list logo
