Hello Alex,
Monday, November 3, 2003, 6:04:41 AM, you wrote:
> Executable files contain various printable information.
> For instance, list of used DLLs.
> However those files contain neither compiler name nor compiler version.
> It seems to be worth including something like "gcc version 3.3.1
> From: Alex Vinokur
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:05 AM
> Executable files contain various printable information.
> For instance, list of used DLLs.
>
> However those files contain neither compiler name nor compiler version.
> It seems to be worth including something like "gcc version 3.3.
Alex Vinokur wrote:
> However those files contain neither compiler name nor compiler version.
> It seems to be worth including something like "gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)"
> in executables.
There's no standard place in the PE header (in the object files) for
this sort of information.
Be
Executable files contain various printable information.
For instance, list of used DLLs.
However those files contain neither compiler name nor compiler version.
It seems to be worth including something like "gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)" in
executables.
Next question. Is it possible to a
4 matches
Mail list logo