On 7 October 2010 04:12, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 10/6/2010 2:44 PM, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> I can't see anything obviously wrong with mkshortcut.
>
> Nor can I.
>
>> It converts the
>> link name with cygwin_conv_to_win32_path(), adds '.lnk', and prepends
>> the start menu path.
>>
>> cygwin_conv_to
On 10/6/2010 2:44 PM, Andy Koppe wrote:
> I can't see anything obviously wrong with mkshortcut.
Nor can I.
> It converts the
> link name with cygwin_conv_to_win32_path(), adds '.lnk', and prepends
> the start menu path.
>
> cygwin_conv_to_win32_path() is ...
Although, all of these instances of
On 6 October 2010 15:39, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 06:28 AM, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>
>> On 6 October 2010 12:54, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>
>>> Any reason why with my setup, mintty.sh exits with status 3 when run by
>>> setup.exe, but with status 0 when I run it by hand?
>>> /var/log/setup.log.full
On 10/06/2010 06:28 AM, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 6 October 2010 12:54, Eric Blake wrote:
Any reason why with my setup, mintty.sh exits with status 3 when run by
setup.exe, but with status 0 when I run it by hand? /var/log/setup.log.full
doesn't give any hints; what else can I try to debug the issue?
On 6 October 2010 12:54, Eric Blake wrote:
> Any reason why with my setup, mintty.sh exits with status 3 when run by
> setup.exe, but with status 0 when I run it by hand? /var/log/setup.log.full
> doesn't give any hints; what else can I try to debug the issue?
Assuming you were installing for All
Any reason why with my setup, mintty.sh exits with status 3 when run by
setup.exe, but with status 0 when I run it by hand?
/var/log/setup.log.full doesn't give any hints; what else can I try to
debug the issue?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization librar
"Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nebob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: Postinstall failure
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Nebob wrote:
>
> > I searched don't hit me!
> &g
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Nebob wrote:
> I searched don't hit me!
>
> The problem is that the postinstall scripts fail to execute properly and
> leave me with a non-functional cygwin installation. ie: clicking the cygwin
> shortcut leads to a "bash-2.05b$" prompt from which no commands work. System
> i
I searched don't hit me!
The problem is that the postinstall scripts fail to execute properly and
leave me with a non-functional cygwin installation. ie: clicking the cygwin
shortcut leads to a "bash-2.05b$" prompt from which no commands work. System
is XP SP1. setup.exe is 2.340.2.5.
I located s
Here is how sh behaves when executing a script with strange permissions
/> cat sayhi
echo hi
/> getfacl sayhi
# file: sayhi
# owner: AdministratorS
# group: Users
user::---
user:PHumblet:rwx
group::---
mask:rwx
other:---
/> sh -c sayhi<== OK
hi
/> sh -c /sayhi <== Does not rea
From: "Pierre A. Humblet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Possible fixes:
1) cd to /etc/postinstall before running the scripts and use relative paths
2) Put my 2nd ntsec patch in setup (I have asked Rudiyanto to test it)
3) Run the postinstall scripts with CYGWIN=nontsec, for boostrap.
Note that scri
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:17:41AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > Possible fixes:
> > 1) cd to /etc/postinstall before running the scripts and use relative paths
> > 2) Put my 2nd ntsec patch in setup (I have asked Rudiyanto to test it)
> > 3) Run the postinstall scripts with CYGWIN=nontsec, f
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:18:40AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> OK, I've got it:
>
> /> sh -c sayhi
> hi
> /> sh -c /sayhi
> /sayhi: not found
>
> With strace I saw that sh uses stat (which won't show rxw rights
> in this case) and it behaves differently for absolute paths.
>
> Possible fix
OK, I've got it:
/> sh -c sayhi
hi
/> sh -c /sayhi
/sayhi: not found
With strace I saw that sh uses stat (which won't show rxw rights
in this case) and it behaves differently for absolute paths.
Possible fixes:
1) cd to /etc/postinstall before running the scripts and use relative paths
2) Put my
Rudiyanto Gunawan wrote:
>
> Ok, here is what I got
>
> bash-2.05b$ /usr/bin/sh -c /etc/postinstall/passwd-grp.sh.done
> /etc/postinstall/passwd-grp.sh.done: not found
>
> I don't have /etc/passwd. After mkpasswd and mkgroup,
> getfacl /etc gave me:
> bash-2.05b$ /usr/bin/getfacl /etc
> # file: /
From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rudiyanto,
I'm replying back to your Hotmail account and Cc'ing the list.
The above indicates that your /etc/passwd was not constructed properly for
some reason. Are you logging in as a domain user by any chance? I
imagine people with deep knowl
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:14:14PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > >
> > > Since this is happening on a clean install, I can only assume that there
> > > is something wrong with the mkpasswd invoc
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:14:14PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >
> > Since this is happening on a clean install, I can only assume that there
> > is something wrong with the mkpasswd invocation... But I'd be very
> > interested in Pierre's and
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:14:14PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> Since this is happening on a clean install, I can only assume that there
> is something wrong with the mkpasswd invocation... But I'd be very
> interested in Pierre's and Corinna's opinion on this.
Igor, what's your reading o
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rudiyanto Gunawan wrote:
>From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Rudiyanto,
>
>Could you please do a clean install using the latest snapshot of setup
>that you downloaded (2.348)? Also, please select the gcc-mingw package as
>part of that reinstall. The reason for
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rudiyanto Gunawan wrote:
> >From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Ok, this is very interesting...
> >Is this from a clean install, or is this a reinstall?
> >Did you happen to install the gcc-mingw package? If so, could you please
> >post the logged output of that?
>
From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ok, this is very interesting...
Is this from a clean install, or is this a reinstall?
Did you happen to install the gcc-mingw package? If so, could you please
post the logged output of that?
Oh, and which OS are you running on?
The problem arised wh
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rudiyanto Gunawan wrote:
> >From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Rudiyanto,
> >
> >Could you please check whether the exact files exist, or whether they
> >exist with suffix ".done"? Also, please search the log for, say,
> >"bzip2.sh" and see if it repeats more than
From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rudiyanto,
Could you please check whether the exact files exist, or whether they
exist with suffix ".done"? Also, please search the log for, say,
"bzip2.sh" and see if it repeats more than once. If neither of the above
holds, please post the output
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rudiyanto Gunawan wrote:
> >From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > The error message was too fast to be seen clearly, but
> > > I think it was saying:
> > > /etc/postinstall/filename.sh not found
> > >
> > > I am trying to install all packages. But, I could
> > > not
From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The error message was too fast to be seen clearly, but
> I think it was saying:
> /etc/postinstall/filename.sh not found
>
> I am trying to install all packages. But, I could
> not get it to work even for the default packages.
> This was using th
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rudiyanto Gunawan wrote:
> >From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: Rudiyanto Gunawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Postinstall failure: file not found
&g
From: Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rudiyanto Gunawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Postinstall failure: file not found
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:27:15 -0500 (EST)
What is the exact message you're getti
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rudiyanto Gunawan wrote:
> I am hoping that someone could help me.
> Yesterday (4/2/03), I tried to update my cygwin, which
> I installed last year. However, at the end of
> the update, the postinstall script failed.
> The error messages implied that the
> postinstallation file
I am hoping that someone could help me.
Yesterday (4/2/03), I tried to update my cygwin, which
I installed last year. However, at the end of
the update, the postinstall script failed.
The error messages implied that the
postinstallation files that were supposed to be
inside /etc/postinstall, did no
30 matches
Mail list logo
