Re: cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-31 Thread Andrew DeFaria
Adam Csillag wrote: Okay, here we go. By the way apache runs perfectly without php. Actually Apache for Cygwin has been known to just hang over time in later versions of Cygwin. As such, unless you plan only on playing around with it, I would suggest you use Apache for Windows instead of Apache

RE: cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-31 Thread Adam Csillag
Okay, here we go. By the way apache runs perfectly without php. Adam -Original Message- From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 8:34 PM To: Adam Csillag Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cygwin + apache + php problem This is a WAG, but what are

RE: cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-31 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 8:09 PM > To: Adam Csillag > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: cygwin + apache + php problem > > What user is apache running as? Does *that* user have read/execute > permission on libphp4.dll? > >

RE: cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-31 Thread Adam Csillag
I have now set apache to run as Adam, who has all necessary rights, but that didn't help. Adam -Original Message- From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 8:09 PM To: Adam Csillag Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cygwin + apache + php pr

RE: cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-31 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
ski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 6:22 PM > To: Adam Csillag > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cygwin + apache + php problem > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Adam Csillag wrote: > > > >Are the permissions of libphp4.dll OK? > > > > No

RE: cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-31 Thread Adam Csillag
ECTED] Subject: Re: cygwin + apache + php problem On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Adam Csillag wrote: > >Are the permissions of libphp4.dll OK? > > Now I set it to the same group, and same permissions as the other files: > -rwxr-x--- > I still get the same error message. The only difference is

Re: cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-31 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Adam Csillag wrote: > >Are the permissions of libphp4.dll OK? > > Now I set it to the same group, and same permissions as the other files: > -rwxr-x--- > I still get the same error message. The only difference is that the other > files have -rwxr-x---+. What does that + sign m

Re: cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-31 Thread Adam Csillag
>Are the permissions of libphp4.dll OK? Now I set it to the same group, and same permissions as the other files: -rwxr-x--- I still get the same error message. The only difference is that the other files have -rwxr-x---+. What does that + sign mean, and how do I set it? Or does that have anything

Re: cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-31 Thread Jason Tishler
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:14:56AM +0200, Adam Csillag wrote: > Syntax error on line 236 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/libphp4.dll into server: > dlopen: Win32 error 998 ^^^ $ fgrep 998L /usr/include/w32api/winerror.h #define ERROR_NOACCESS 998L >

cygwin + apache + php problem

2003-03-30 Thread Adam Csillag
Hi, I'm having problems starting apache with php. I get the following error, when I run /usr/sbin/apachectl start : Syntax error on line 236 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/libphp4.dll into server: dlopen: Win32 error 998 /usr/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be starte

PHP problem

2003-02-10 Thread ZHAO Wei
ts let me believe that it's not a Cygwin Socket Impl. problem, neither Apache's problem, but a PHP problem or a combo. Or, my misunderstanding somewhere. Any suggestions? 8< I'm doing a very simple web chat room for use by only two persons, and I use the tag to automati