On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:39:48PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>On 8/5/2010 7:10 PM, David Bala??ic wrote:
>> On the other side, if web archives are the problem, why not change them?
>> Some mail archive program have that feature.
>
>We've been down this road before. If you want details, che
Larry Hall (Cygwin)
<>wrote:
^^
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>Thanks.
Without concrete advice that link doesn't do much.
An average Joe has no idea what configuring means anyway, let alone
being able to do such a change.
For example, how do I do that in
August 2010 18:00, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
>>>> <> wrote:
>>>
>>> ^^
>>> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR> Thanks.
>>
>> Without concrete advice that link doesn't do much.
>> An average Joe has no idea what configuring means any
> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:00:50 -0400
> From: reply-to-list-only-lh
> Subject: Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR Re: Setup.exe update confusion
>
> On 8/5/2010 1:26 PM, Steven Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:13, DePriest, Jason R.<
On 8/5/2010 1:26 PM, Steven Collins wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:13, DePriest, Jason R.<> wrote:
In Gmail, I do it manually. It only takes a few seconds.
However, I did just submit an enhancement request for an option to
auto-obfuscate email addresses in forwards and replies.
Unf
; On 5 August 2010 18:00, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
>>>> <> wrote:
>>>
>>> ^^
>>> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR> Thanks.
>>
>> Without concrete advice that link doesn't do much.
>> An average Joe has no idea what configurin
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:51 AM, David Balažic <> wrote:
> On 5 August 2010 18:37, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <> wrote:
>> On 8/5/2010 12:24 PM, David Balažic wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5 August 2010 18:00, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
>>> <> wrote:
>>
&
On 8/5/2010 12:51 PM, David Balažic wrote:
On 5 August 2010 18:37, Larry Hall (Cygwin)<> wrote:
On 8/5/2010 12:24 PM, David Balažic wrote:
On 5 August 2010 18:00, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
<>wrote:
^^
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>Thanks.
Without co
On 5 August 2010 18:37, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <> wrote:
> On 8/5/2010 12:24 PM, David Balažic wrote:
>>
>> On 5 August 2010 18:00, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
>> <> wrote:
>
> ^^
> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR> Thanks.
Without concrete advi
* Markus E.L. (Sun, 13 May 2007 17:14:46 +0200)
> Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [manually deleted] wrote:
> >
> >> PS: Brian, I've been living under the impression that we are under the
> >> rule not to include cleartext email addresses in quotes? Is that
> >> still so a
Markus E.L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
By hell. My apologies. And with deep regret. etc.
I'll really have to have a look, why that sometimes works and
sometimes not (my address mangling). U
Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [manually deleted] wrote:
>
>> PS: Brian, I've been living under the impression that we are under the
>> rule not to include cleartext email addresses in quotes? Is that
>> still so and would you, please, not burn my address further?
>
> If
On 25 July 2006 16:22, Keith Christian wrote:
> --- Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>> On Jul 25 06:21, Keith Christian wrote:
>>> --- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
>
>
> I use the Yahoo Mail web in
--- Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 25 06:21, Keith Christian wrote:
> > --- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
I use the Yahoo Mail web interface, like thousands of others. Anyone know
offhand how not to quote raw em
izing not updating COLUMNS and LINES
>>
>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Valster Nico-anv009 wrote:
>>
>>
>> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. Thanks.
>>
>
>I got above reply, which leads to:
>Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw E-m
Valster Nico-anv009
>>>> Cc: mwoehlke; cygwin at cygwin.com
>>>> Subject: RE: Re: window resizing not updating COLUMNS and LINES
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Valster Nico-anv009 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCY
ygwin at cygwin.com
> >> Subject: RE: Re: window resizing not updating COLUMNS and LINES
> >>
> >> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Valster Nico-anv009 wrote:
> >>
> >> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. Thanks.
> >
> > I got above reply, which
>
>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Valster Nico-anv009 wrote:
>>
>> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. Thanks.
>
> I got above reply, which leads to:
> Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw E-mail Addresses In
> Your Replies. Some mailers include
009 wrote:
>
>
> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. Thanks.
>
I got above reply, which leads to:
Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw E-mail Addresses In Your
Replies. Some mailers include the raw e-mail address in the "Joe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:"
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 05:25:22PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>>Dave Korn wrote:
>>>Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If
>>>you consider that a pause is a kind of break, well, you don't need to
>>>close a tag, do you
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If you
> > consider that a pause is a kind of break, well, you don't need to close a
> > tag, do you? So you don't need to close a either
>
> I guess the only wa
Dave Korn wrote:
Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If
you consider that a pause is a kind of break, well, you don't need to
close a tag, do you? So you don't need to close a either
I guess the only way to be sure is to pass cgf through the proper validator!
Chri
LDR wrote:
Igor,
First the bad news:
eMail list sellers pay bozos to join mail lists and harvest the
addresses!
I sure wish that IETF would finish the specs on MTA authentication!
The group working on that has been wound up as a result of the
unresolved problems over Microsoft's IP.
Mark Thornt
Igor,
First the bad news:
eMail list sellers pay bozos to join mail lists and harvest the addresses!
I sure wish that IETF would finish the specs on MTA authentication!
Now, the good news:
Thanks for your help. I very much appreciate it.
Lee
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, LDR wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: 24 September 2004 15:37
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If
> >you consider that a pause is a kind of break, w
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Calm down, calm down, there's no need to panic, cgf isn't stalled! If
>you consider that a pause is a kind of break, well, you don't need to
>close a tag, do you? So you don't need to close a either
Sometimes it is like Dave Korn is re
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Robb, Sam
> Sent: 23 September 2004 19:24
> > >
> > > Hmm. I wonder if I just replaced all of the '@'s with a png
> > of an '@',
> > > if that would foil the spammers.
> > >
> > > Nope. Wouldn't work for the text archives.
> > >
>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:34:13AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
there is dbmail, but it doesn't work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet.
Don't see how dbmail will help you with spam.
I want to store my mail in a database. My email client should only
need to display the mail,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:34:13AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Hello Andrew,
>
>>> there is dbmail, but it doesn't work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet.
>
>> Don't see how dbmail will help you with spam.
>
>I want to store my mail in a database. My email client should only
>need to display the mai
Hello Andrew,
>> there is dbmail, but it doesn't work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet.
> Don't see how dbmail will help you with spam.
I want to store my mail in a database. My email client should only
need to display the mail, not working as a database server. I tried
again to get dbmail up and
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hello Andrew,
You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm
getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with
filtering.
Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL
database as well as bouncing most of them on my l
"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote:
> >> You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm
> >> getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with
> >> filtering.
>
> > Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL
> > database as well as bouncing most of
Hello Andrew,
>> You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm
>> getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with
>> filtering.
> Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL
> database as well as bouncing most of them on my little 3
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo Richard,
Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 18:12 schriebst du:
To filter out spam at the client side is not possible, I would need
another PC just to filter my emails...
I disagree. SpamBayes is working very well for me (as an Outlook
plugin; SpamBayes also integra
Hello Reini,
> PCYMTNQREAIYR does not help for me, since I'm FAQ author and perl cpan
> author. this is a bad combination.
I'm Cygwin package maintainer, this is a bad combi too.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem rep
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Generally speaking, no measure is completely spam-proof, except
complete erasure of e-mail addresses (which will conflict with any
other legitimate use of "@" on the list). Spamming is more or less an
industry now, and one can imagine an industrious spammer (or spam
har
> >
> > Hmm. I wonder if I just replaced all of the '@'s with a png
> of an '@',
> > if that would foil the spammers.
> >
> > Nope. Wouldn't work for the text archives.
> >
>
> Sorry, been working on standards compliance of my web site
> but it seems
> to me that you left off the closing !
Hallo Richard,
Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 18:12 schriebst du:
>> To filter out spam at the client side is not possible, I would need
>> another PC just to filter my emails...
> I disagree. SpamBayes is working very well for me (as an Outlook
> plugin; SpamBayes also integrates with p
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
_Now_ is it on-topic?
:-)
I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which
have only been used to send email to mailing lists which munge
addresses with the "me at cgf dot cx" method, so this
pamcop.net contract some years ago.
PCYMTNQREAIYR does not help for me, since I'm FAQ author and perl cpan
author. this is a bad combination.
We really need some *global* rules, e.g. SPF and some other, similar
method, to get 99% of spamservers out of the internet.
hmm, this is against business
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> >>>Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
> >>
> >>>On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:55:29PM -0400, LDR wrote:
>I receive the Cygwin email lists in digest format.
>
>The email addresses are preserved in these.
>
>Isn't this unnecessary exposure?
>
>Can't names be harvested by subscribing to the list and then harvesting
>new addresses from each new digest
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
>>>Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
>>
>>>On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
_Now_ i
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, LDR wrote:
> I receive the Cygwin email lists in digest format.
>
> The email addresses are preserved in these.
>
> Isn't this unnecessary exposure?
> Can't names be harvested by subscribing to the list and then harvesting new
> addresses from each new digest?
You're giving w
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Igor Pechtchanski
> > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:43
>
> > > > You mean, like "`banner -c@ @`"? ;-)
>
> ISTM that http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YOWTWYWT !
>
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /win/c/> `banner -c@ @`
> > > bash: :
I receive the Cygwin email lists in digest format.
The email addresses are preserved in these.
Isn't this unnecessary exposure?
Can't names be harvested by subscribing to the list and then harvesting
new addresses from each new digest?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscrib
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Pechtchanski
> Sent: 23 September 2004 17:43
> > > You mean, like "`banner -c@ @`"? ;-)
ISTM that http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YOWTWYWT !
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /win/c/> `banner -c@ @`
> > bash: : command not found
> >
> > AAARRRGHGHGHGHG!!!1!!
ember who in particular) for telling
> me about outlook-quotefix which Just Works(tm). It's not Cygwin related but
> this should be in a FAQ somewhere - maybe in the OLOCA as a link under
> PCYMTNQREAIYR?
You know, I was just thinking that. However, I'd rather not include
links
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Umm, given the subject, this is particularly vile. :-D
> > Sent: 23 September 2004 16:44
>
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> > > > -Original Message-
>
t remember who in particular) for telling
me about outlook-quotefix which Just Works(tm). It's not Cygwin related but
this should be in a FAQ somewhere - maybe in the OLOCA as a link under
PCYMTNQREAIYR?
Bill
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ To
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
> > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:09
>
> > We really need some *global* rules, e.g. SPF and some other, similar
> > method, to get 99% of spamservers out of the internet.
>
> Nah
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> To filter out spam at the client side is not possible...
Well, aside from an occasional simpleton who gets duped into replying to a
spam message, the main danger of spam is the mass e-mailing aspect that
ties up computer and network resources. So I g
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
> Sent: 23 September 2004 17:09
> We really need some *global* rules, e.g. SPF and some other, similar
> method, to get 99% of spamservers out of the internet.
>
Nahh. What we really need are not rules; what we ne
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 September 2004 16:44
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> > > Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
> > >
> > > H
> To filter out spam at the client side is not possible, I would need
> another PC just to filter my emails...
I disagree. SpamBayes is working very well for me (as an Outlook
plugin; SpamBayes also integrates with procmail and about a million
other things).
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/
Hello Igor,
> Spamming is more or less an industry now, ...
All what clients can do about spam is to completely ignore all emails
which are not from known senders, so you get just some crap through
the lists, even no personal replies to some list postings if you have
the sender not whitelisted, s
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> > Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
>
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> > >_Now_ is it on-topic?
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > I have to point out that I'm
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: 23 September 2004 15:40
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >_Now_ is it on-topic?
>
> :-)
>
> I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which
> have only bee
ents.
> E-mail addresses posted to Web sites using these conventions did not receive
> any spam. "
Interesting.
> ObCygwin: This relates to and confirms some of the information on the
> cygwin website so it's not too off-topic!
> (http
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>_Now_ is it on-topic?
:-)
I have to point out that I'm getting spam to some new accounts which
have only been used to send email to mailing lists which munge addresses
with the "me at cgf dot cx" method, so this isn't foolproof.
Hmm.
n: This relates to and confirms some of the information on the
cygwin website so it's not too off-topic!
(http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PCYMTNQREAIYR)
ObCygwin: Oh, alright then.
Index: acronyms/index.html
===
RCS file: /c
GARY VANSICKLE wrote:
>>Well, if you're using outlook/outlook express, there's a
>>program called Outlook-quotefix or OE-quotefix, depending on
>>which you're using. They latch into outlook/oe to provide
>>this functionality.
>
> Are you sure this is true? I downloaded it and can't get it to
> From: Dave Korn
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 7:26 PM
[SNIP]
> Result 2:
> Outlook-QuoteFix - Home - [ Translate this page ]
> Clean up messages with extraneous quote markings.
> home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/ - 1k - Cached - Similar
> pages
> [ More results from home.in.tum.de
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hannu E K Nevalainen
> Sent: 12 July 2004 18:19
> > >> On Sun, July 11, 2004 10:22 pm, LDR said:
> > >>> --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
> > >> Well, if you're using outlook/outlook express, there's a progr
> From: GARY VANSICKLE
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 3:08 AM
> cygwin-ownerXXXYOU_KNOW_THE_REST wrote on Sunday, July 11, 2004 7:54 PM:
>
>
> >> On Sun, July 11, 2004 10:22 pm, LDR said:
> >>> --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> >> Well, if y
The headers are still
>>munged...
>>
>>There might be a way to find and match just the reply lead-ins (e.g.,
>>"On some date, John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:", or
>
>This form should cover almost all the cases, and the PCYMTNQREAIYR
>messages can
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:59:25AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>I realize that. That's why I said "the sample filter", not "the whole set
>of filters". In fact, I'm sure if anyone could simply provide you with a
>(tested[*]) perl regular expression that would more or less reliably match
>the
..
>
> There might be a way to find and match just the
> reply lead-ins (e.g., "On
> some date, John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:", or
This form should cover almost all the cases, and the
PCYMTNQREAIYR messages can be limited to those special
cases where violations o
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:36:41AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:32:03AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> >On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Elvin Peterson wrote:
> >> >
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:36:41AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:32:03AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Elvin Peterson wrote:
>> >
>> >> --- Larry Hall wrote:
>> >> > Lots of email clients do
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:32:03AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Elvin Peterson wrote:
> >
> >> --- Larry Hall wrote:
> >> > Lots of email clients do this automatically.
> >>
> >> This should be done server side, by the mai
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:32:03AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Elvin Peterson wrote:
>
>> --- Larry Hall wrote:
>> > Lots of email clients do this automatically.
>>
>> This should be done server side, by the mailing list
>> manager. If you subscribe to any of the sourcefo
ago, thus
spake John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"), which should catch most of the
"violations", but, as even the two above examples illustrate, the lead-ins
are varied enough that it's probably not possible. If anyone feels it's a
hassle to double-check their e-mail soft
--- Larry Hall wrote:
> Lots of email clients do this automatically.
This should be done server side, by the mailing list
manager. If you subscribe to any of the sourceforge
lists, you will know that they do this automatically.
Much better than requesting each person to do it
everytime (somethi
LDR wrote:
--- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*PCYMTNQREAIYR* -- Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw
> E-mail Addresses In Your Replies.
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>.
- What mailers (mail clients?) do support this auto-edi
n Sun, July 11, 2004 10:22 pm, LDR said:
>> > --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> *PCYMTNQREAIYR* -- Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw
>> >> E-mail Addresses In Your Replies.
>> >>
>>
cygwin-ownerXXXYOU_KNOW_THE_REST wrote on Sunday, July 11, 2004 7:54 PM:
>> On Sun, July 11, 2004 10:22 pm, LDR said:
>>> --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> *PCYMTNQREAIYR* -- Please
> On Sun, July 11, 2004 10:22 pm, LDR said:
> > --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> *PCYMTNQREAIYR* -- Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw
> >> E-mail Addresses In Your Replies.
> >>
id:
> > --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> *PCYMTNQREAIYR* -- Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw
> >> E-mail Addresses In Your Replies.
> >>
> >
> >> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>.
>
On Sun, July 11, 2004 10:22 pm, LDR said:
> --- Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> *PCYMTNQREAIYR* -- Please Configure Your Mailer To Not Quote Raw
>> E-mail Addresses In Your Replies.
>>
>
>> <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQR
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hannu E K Nevalainen
> Sent: 01 April 2004 19:54
> WRT Outlook (not Express) I've come so far that I can tell
> it has to be a
> redefinition of the "Message" form. Most likely by adding
> some VB code in
> the Open (or maybe Read)
P.S. I understand the frustration -- searching the web for this is a pain.
> > > Greg
> >
> > I didn't know that. Pretty cool, thanks!
> > Igor
>
> Glad it helps! (GIH)? :-)
Umm, I'll think about it...
> > P.S. With all the messages with this subj
> From: Gregory Borota
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 LarrysPCRemediesaolcom wrote:
> >
> > > Igor, How do I go about configuring my mailer to no quote raw-e-mail
> > > addresses if I'm using Outlook? I could find no configuration option
> > > related to
y-leadin=On _DAYDATE_, _FROM_(_ADDRESS_, _MAILBOX_, _FROM_) wrote:
> >
> > > P.S. I understand the frustration -- searching the web for this is a pain.
> > Greg
>
> I didn't know that. Pretty cool, thanks!
> Igor
Glad it helps! (GIH)? :-)
> P.S. With all
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Gregory Borota wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 LarrysPCRemediesaolcom wrote:
> >
> > > Igor, How do I go about configuring my mailer to no quote raw-e-mail
> > > addresses if I'm using Outlook? I could find no configuration optio
Here is an illustration of the previous post about configuring PINE.
Just LarrysPCRemedies is quoted.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, LarrysPCRemedies wrote:
> Igor, How do I go about configuring my mailer to no quote raw-e-mail addresses if
> I'm using Outlook? I could find no configuration option related
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 LarrysPCRemediesaolcom wrote:
>
> > Igor, How do I go about configuring my mailer to no quote raw-e-mail
> > addresses if I'm using Outlook? I could find no configuration option
> > related to this. I understand the need (i.e., e
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 LarrysPCRemediesaolcom wrote:
> Igor, How do I go about configuring my mailer to no quote raw-e-mail
> addresses if I'm using Outlook? I could find no configuration option
> related to this. I understand the need (i.e., e-mail address
> picker-uppers, etc), I'm just curious whi
Igor, How do I go about configuring my mailer to no quote raw-e-mail addresses if I'm
using Outlook? I could find no configuration option related to this. I understand the
need (i.e., e-mail address picker-uppers, etc), I'm just curious which e-mail
mailer(s) has this wondrous option.
Larry
--
89 matches
Mail list logo
