Greetings, ASSI!
> Andrey Repin via Cygwin writes:
>> /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt is missing from my
>> system.
>> The `update-ca-trust extract` doesn't even touch it.
>>
>> What happened?
> Fedora dropped the command
On 2025-03-13 05:57, Antonin Décimo via Cygwin wrote:
With mingw64-x86_64-openssl 3.0.16-1 and mingw64-x86_64-libcurl
8.12.1-1 installed I get these errors:
cygcheck: track_down: could not find ssleay32.dll
cygcheck: track_down: could not find libeay32.dll
These two DLLs were provided by
With mingw64-x86_64-openssl 3.0.16-1 and mingw64-x86_64-libcurl
8.12.1-1 installed I get these errors:
cygcheck: track_down: could not find ssleay32.dll
cygcheck: track_down: could not find libeay32.dll
These two DLLs were provided by openssl 1.0.2 and have been renamed as
libcrypto and libssl
Greetings, ASSI!
> Andrey Repin via Cygwin writes:
>> /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt is missing from my
>> system.
>> The `update-ca-trust extract` doesn't even touch it.
>>
>> What happened?
> Fedora dropped the command
Andrey Repin via Cygwin writes:
> /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt is missing from my
> system.
> The `update-ca-trust extract` doesn't even touch it.
>
> What happened?
Fedora dropped the command that creates the file and removed it from
distr
On 25/02/2025 11:17, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
On 25/02/2025 08:00, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote:
Greetings, All!
/etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt is missing from my
system.
The `update-ca-trust extract` doesn't even touch it.
What happened?
Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
> On 25/02/2025 08:00, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote:
>> Greetings, All!
>> > /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt is missing from my
>> system.
>> The `update-ca-trust extract` doesn't even touch it.
>> > Wha
On 25/02/2025 08:00, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote:
Greetings, All!
/etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt is missing from my
system.
The `update-ca-trust extract` doesn't even touch it.
What happened?
re-install ca-certificates
$ cygcheck -f /etc/pki/ca-trust/extr
Greetings, ASSI!
> Andrey Repin via Cygwin writes:
>> That was the first thing I tried. Then reinstalling.
> Well, reinstalling should have helped:
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> # cygcheck -p ca-bundle.trust.crt
> Found 3 matches for ca-bundle.trust.crt
>
Andrey Repin via Cygwin writes:
> That was the first thing I tried. Then reinstalling.
Well, reinstalling should have helped:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
# cygcheck -p ca-bundle.trust.crt
Found 3 matches for ca-bundle.trust.crt
ca-certificates-2023.2.62_v7.0.
Greetings, ASSI!
> Andrey Repin via Cygwin writes:
>> I've experieenced an issue with my setup, that showed that
>> /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt is empty after
>> installing ca-certificates 2024.2.69-v8.0.401.
>> Rolling back to v8.0.30
Andrey Repin via Cygwin writes:
> I've experieenced an issue with my setup, that showed that
> /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt is empty after
> installing ca-certificates 2024.2.69-v8.0.401.
> Rolling back to v8.0.302 restores the file.
Just run update
On 2024-11-02 12:52, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote:
I've experieenced an issue with my setup, that showed that
/etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle.trust.crt is empty after
installing ca-certificates 2024.2.69-v8.0.401.
Rolling back to v8.0.302 restores the file.
++
$ llgo /et
Deter using detached attribute in cygwin. for details [1].
You might find static-linking as useful workaround for this issue which
requires build openssl from source code.
Thread 7 "a" hit Breakpoint 9, init_thread_remove_handlers (
handsin=handsin@entry=0x0) at crypto/initthread
Hi,
(Sent to cygwin-developers by mistake).
When debugging a segfault in the Dillo browser[1] with the DNS threaded
resolver and OpenSSL 3.0.13 I managed to isolate a reproducer.
[1]: https://github.com/dillo-browser/dillo/issues/172
It seems to be caused when both the SSL_library_init() is
FOPPE, JEFFERY B CIV USAF AFMC AFLCMC/WFRQ via Cygwin writes:
> Is the OpenSSL 3.0.14 package going to be released soon?
You should ask that question upstream first.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
DIY Stuff:
http://Synth.Str
Is the OpenSSL 3.0.14 package going to be released soon?
Jeff Foppe
AFLCMC/WFRQ
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 3:40 PM Cary Lewis via Cygwin wrote:
>
> Attempting to run:
>
> openssl enc -base64 -i file
>
> gives the following error:
>
> 42949672976:error:25066067:DSO support routines:dlfcn_load:could not load
> the shared library:crypto/d
Attempting to run:
openssl enc -base64 -i file
gives the following error:
42949672976:error:25066067:DSO support routines:dlfcn_load:could not load
the shared library:crypto/dso/dso_dlfcn.c:118:filename(libproviders.dll):
No such file or directory
42949672976:error:25070067:DSO support
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:36 AM Michael Soegtrop wrote:
>
> Dear Cygwin Team,
>
> since a while I have these errors in the setup log file of new cygwin
> installations
>
> C:\bin\cygwin\var\log\setup.log.full:
>
> running: C:\bin\cygwin\bin\bash.exe --norc --noprofile
> "/etc/postinstall/ca-certi
Dear Cygwin Team,
since a while I have these errors in the setup log file of new cygwin
installations
C:\bin\cygwin\var\log\setup.log.full:
running: C:\bin\cygwin\bin\bash.exe --norc --noprofile
"/etc/postinstall/ca-certificates.sh"
/usr/bin/ln: failed to create symbolic link
'/etc/pki/ca-t
Greetings, Yuri!
> I've built the proxytunnel project in Cygwin
> (https://github.com/proxytunnel/proxytunnel).
> It is usually used to tunnel ssh through https using the https CONNECT
> command.
> The command "proxytunnel --no-check-certificate -E -p
> {https-proxy-host}:{https-proxy-port} -d
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1w-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1w-1
[…]
Please disregard, this was sent before I finished editing it.
--
*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look
at the "List-Unsubscribe: " tag in the email header of this message.
Send email to the address speci
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1v-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1v-1
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1u-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1u-1
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution for
testing, please report any issues to the main Cygwin mailing list.
OpenSSL 1.1 will go EOL in September 2023. Cygwin will most likely
switch to OpenSSL 3 LTS soon (3.0.x, which has a planned EOL of
September 2026).
This
I've been getting random
OpenSSL: FATAL
OPENSSL_Uplink(008A7C34,08): no OPENSSL_Applink
crashes in an app built using
./configure --host=i686-w64-mingw32
https://www.openssl.org/docs/faq.html
has this bit under
I’ve compiled a program under Windows and it crashes: why?
As per
Fergus Daly via Cygwin writes:
> During today's update (not test 3.0.9-0.1) this probably unimportant error
> msg occurred:
> running: D:\cygwin64\bin\bash.exe --norc --noprofile
> "/etc/postinstall/openssl.sh"
> can't run /etc/postinstall/openssl.sh: No such file
WJFFM, must have been a problem
During today's update (not test 3.0.9-0.1) this probably unimportant error msg
occurred:
running: D:\cygwin64\bin\bash.exe --norc --noprofile
"/etc/postinstall/openssl.sh"
can't run /etc/postinstall/openssl.sh: No such file
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1u-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1u-1
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution for
testing, please report any issues to the main Cygwin mailing list.
OpenSSL 1.1 will go EOL in September 2023. Cygwin will most likely
switch to OpenSSL 3 LTS soon (3.0.x, which has a planned EOL of
September 2026).
This
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution for
testing, please report any issues to the main Cygwin mailing list.
OpenSSL 1.1 will go EOL in September 2023. Cygwin will most likely
switch to OpenSSL 3 LTS soon (3.0.x, which has a planned EOL of
September 2026).
This
On 5/8/23 10:40, Achim Gratz via Cygwin wrote:
The port might not be open in the standard configuration of the Windows
firewall. Maybe you can use either openssl or curl to check what
happens when you are trying to connect.
It looks like this function is used incorrectly, and it actually
ror message in
> proxytunnel:
>
>> SSL_set_tlsext_host_name returned: 1 (0x1). TLS SNI error, giving up
The port might not be open in the standard configuration of the Windows
firewall. Maybe you can use either openssl or curl to check what
happens when you are trying to connect.
Reg
On 5/8/23 08:31, Brian Inglis wrote:
Which Cygwin, ssl/tls-devel libraries, and ca-certificates... packages
and versions are you using?
libssl-devel-1.1.1t-1
openssl-1.1.1t-1
ca-certificates-2021.2.60-1
$ man SSL_set_tlsext_host_name
says SSL_set_tlsext_host_name etc. returns 1 for
On 2023-05-08 01:31, Yuri via Cygwin wrote:
I've built the proxytunnel project in Cygwin
(https://github.com/proxytunnel/proxytunnel).
It is usually used to tunnel ssh through https using the https CONNECT command.
The command "proxytunnel --no-check-certificate -E -p
{https-proxy-host}:{https-
I've built the proxytunnel project in Cygwin
(https://github.com/proxytunnel/proxytunnel).
It is usually used to tunnel ssh through https using the https CONNECT
command.
The command "proxytunnel --no-check-certificate -E -p
{https-proxy-host}:{https-proxy-port} -d 127.0.0.1:22" works on Li
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1t-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1t-1
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1s-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1s-1
Carlo B. writes:
> Actually, if you get the "src" packages of openssl for mingw64 and you
> try to build them with cygport, it happens that includes, DLLs and
> libraries are installed directly into the *REAL* destination
> directory, into:
>
> /usr/x86_64-w64-m
The following MinGW64 test packages are re-released to fix a packaging
error:
mingw64-i686-openssl-1.1.1q-0.2
mingw64-x86_64-openssl-1.1.1q-0.2
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared
libraries
Hello,
if you look these packages:
mingw64-x86_64-openssl-1.1.1q-0.1
mingw64-x86_64-openssl-1.1.1p-0.1
mingw64-i686-openssl-1.1.1q-0.1
mingw64-i686-openssl-1.1.1p-0.1
they are EMPTY.
For example, the content of mingw64-x86_64-openssl-1.1.1q-0.1 is:
usr/
usr/share/
usr/share/doc/
usr/share/doc
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1q-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1q-1
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1p-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1p-1
Greetings, Achim Gratz!
> Andrey Repin writes:
>> Is there a chance to update OpenSSL to v3? It has a number of improvements
>> and
>> bug fixes I'd like to use.
> It also has a number of incompatibilities with the previous version(s).
Meaning they can't be
Andrey Repin writes:
> Is there a chance to update OpenSSL to v3? It has a number of improvements and
> bug fixes I'd like to use.
It also has a number of incompatibilities with the previous version(s).
I am not sure yet how to deal with the packaging problems that is going
to create
Greetings, All!
Is there a chance to update OpenSSL to v3? It has a number of improvements and
bug fixes I'd like to use.
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Saturday, June 11, 2022 1:02:06
Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.htm
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1o-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1o-1
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream security patch release and
continues to use the Fedora patches from an earlier release (Fedora has
already switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1n-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1n-1
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates to the latest upstream patch release and continues
to use the Fedora patches for the previous release (Fedora has already
switched to openssl 3.x).
* openssl-1.1.1m-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1m-1
* libssl1.1
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution.
This release updates the Fedora patches to their latest version.
* openssl-1.1.1l-2
* openssl-perl-1.1.1l-2
* libssl1.1-1.1.1l-2
* libssl-devel-1.1.1l-2
The following MinGW64 test packages are made available:
* mingw64-i686
packages have been updated to the same version:
2 mingw64-i686-openssl-1.0.2u+za-1
2 mingw64-x86_64-openssl-1.0.2u+za-1
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared
libraries which provide various
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* openssl-1.1.1l-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1l-1
* libssl1.1-1.1.1l-1
* libssl-devel-1.1.1l-1
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared
On 2021-01-04 08:11, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 04.01.2021 13:21, tommie.k...@alverservices.com wrote:
But im struggling to see how I can upgrade openssl >1.1.1f
Compliance checks state that we must have a more up to date version, I know
that it exists (1.1.1g, 1.1.1h, 1.1.1i)
ht
On 04.01.2021 13:21, tommie.k...@alverservices.com wrote:
Hey, sorry if this is the wrong place.
Hi Tommie,
this is the right place.
But im struggling to see how I can upgrade openssl >1.1.1f
Compliance checks state that we must have a more up to date version, I know
that it exi
Hey, sorry if this is the wrong place.
But im struggling to see how I can upgrade openssl >1.1.1f
Compliance checks state that we must have a more up to date version, I know
that it exists (1.1.1g, 1.1.1h, 1.1.1i)
But I can only seem to upgrade to 1.1.1f in Cygwin - is ther
diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256
> ecdh-sha2-nistp256
> ecdh-sha2-nistp384
> ecdh-sha2-nistp521
> curve25519-sha256
> curve25519-sha...@libssh.org
> sntrup4591761x25519-sha...@tinyssh.org
>
> $ ssh admin@10.0.3.6
> Connection reset by 10.0.3.6 port 22
>
> Complet
Complete listing:
$ ssh -vv -oHostKeyAlgorithms=+ssh-dss -oStrictHostKeyChecking=no admin@10.0.3.6
OpenSSH_8.3p1, OpenSSL 1.1.1f 31 Mar 2020
debug2: resolve_canonicalize: hostname 10.0.3.6 is address
debug2: ssh_connect_direct
debug1: Connecting to 10.0.3.6 [10.0.3.6] port 22.
debug1: Connection
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* openssl-1.1.1f-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1f-1
* libssl1.1-1.1.1f-1
* libssl-devel-1.1.1f-1
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared
> Am 08.04.2020 um 11:30 schrieb Tommie King:
> > Hey, sorry if this is the wrong place.
>
> Hi Tommie,
> right place
>
> > But im struggling to see how I can upgrade openssl >1.1.1d
> >
> > Compliance checks state that we must have a more up to date
Am 08.04.2020 um 11:30 schrieb Tommie King:
Hey, sorry if this is the wrong place.
Hi Tommie,
right place
But im struggling to see how I can upgrade openssl >1.1.1d
Compliance checks state that we must have a more up to date version, I know
that it exists (1.1.1f)
that was released jus
Hey, sorry if this is the wrong place.
But im struggling to see how I can upgrade openssl >1.1.1d
Compliance checks state that we must have a more up to date version, I know
that it exists (1.1.1f)
But I can only seem to upgrade to 1.1.1 in Cygwin - is there a new upgrade
pack
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* openssl-1.1.1d-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1d-1
* libssl1.1-1.1.1d-1
* libssl-devel-1.1.1d-1
* libssl1.0-1.0.2t-1
* libssl1.0-devel-1.0.2t-1
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL
On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 14:25 +, D'Ambra, Nikki M wrote:
> Now that the latest versions of openssl, versions 1.1.1d and 1.0.2t, are
> available
> to the public, are there plans, or an ETA, to make these openssl packages
> available
> to the cygwin community?
Of cour
Now that the latest versions of openssl, versions 1.1.1d and 1.0.2t, are
available to the public, are there plans, or an ETA, to make these openssl
packages available to the cygwin community?
Thank you,
Nikki
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ
On 2019-08-22 12:03, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 14:31 +, D'Ambra, Nikki M [US] (MS) (Contr)
> wrote:
>> Are there plans to make the openssl 1.0.2t package available to the cygwin
>> community?
>
> 1.0.2t has yet to be released upstream.
...
On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 14:31 +, D'Ambra, Nikki M [US] (MS) (Contr)
wrote:
> Are there plans to make the openssl 1.0.2t package available to the cygwin
> community?
1.0.2t has yet to be released upstream.
--
Yaakov
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/proble
Are there plans to make the openssl 1.0.2t package available to the cygwin
community?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* openssl-1.1.1c-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1c-1
* libssl1.1-1.1.1c-1
* libssl-devel-1.1.1c-1
* libssl1.0-1.0.2s-1
* libssl1.0-devel-1.0.2s-1
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL
On 2019-06-04 22:26, Houder wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:04:16, Vince Rice wrote:
>> It's cygport, he doesn't have to know about compiling C. ...
> Vince, this utter nonsense, and you know it!
He hopefully should not, just rebuilding and reconfiguring an existing source
package, with current to
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:04:16, Vince Rice wrote:
> It's cygport, he doesn't have to know about compiling C. ...
Vince, this utter nonsense, and you know it!
Henri
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http:
ompiling a package like OpenSSL is not
straightforward even with Cygport but still feasable with reasonnable efforts
(I guess because I'm used to have unsual setup where automatic tool does not
work out of the box :) )
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2019-06/msg00026.html
Read the thread dude an
> On Jun 4, 2019, at 5:55 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
>
> Easy compared to what, assembly?
Easy compared to hard.
> He shows some domain knowledge of OpenSSL, but where are you getting that he
> knows about compiling C?
It's cygport, he doesn't have to know about compilin
what, assembly? I am comfortable with 3 programming languages,
and learning 4 others, and compiling C is not "relatively easy". Especially
considering the scope:
$ cd openssl-master
$ find -name '*.c' -exec wc -l {} + | tail -1
419738 total
400,000 lines of C.
I a
me amount of technical expertise, based on a
poster asking about openssl configuration and which ECs they want to support.
If they need more help they can ask in a follow up.
Please refrain from your own inappropriate assumptions and meta-commentary based
on that, as this is not a social media pl
Hi Guys,
Thanks for your feedback.
I have recompile the openssl package with Cygport and this has allowed
me to point out the differences between the OpenSSL mainline and the
Cygwin pacakge.
Actually the Cygwin package follow the spec from Fedora package where
it has been decided to remove some
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:35:29, Brian Inglis wrote:
You can easily rebuild the package yourself with the cygport utility, to check
that works, then change the build config to include the Brainpool ECs, and
rebuild the way you want it.
Please do not presume someones technical prowess. It might be e
On 2019-06-03 06:09, Benjamin Baratte wrote:
> I would like to understand why the OpenSSL 1.1.1b package only includes the
> NIST EC curves support ?
> I'm basically try to use brainpool curves and I have noticed that the
> package 1.1.1b does not includes these curves and mo
Hi Cygwin team,
I would like to understand why the OpenSSL 1.1.1b package only includes the
NIST EC curves support ?
I'm basically try to use brainpool curves and I have noticed that the
package 1.1.1b does not includes these curves and more generally only
includes NIST curves
$ openssl ve
Greetings, Sorin Adrian Savu!
>> Greetings, Sorin Adrian Savu!
>>
>> > Hello!
>>
>> > I had to compile openssh recently, and the README for cygwin is
>> referencing
>> > openssl-devel package which is obsolete now. I spent some time tr
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:50 AM Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Sorin Adrian Savu!
>
> > Hello!
>
> > I had to compile openssh recently, and the README for cygwin is
> referencing
> > openssl-devel package which is obsolete now. I spent some time trying to
>
On 2019-05-26 00:19, Sorin Adrian Savu wrote:
> I had to compile openssh recently, and the README for cygwin is referencing
> openssl-devel package which is obsolete now. I spent some time trying to
> figure this out. Can you please update
> https://github.com/openssh/openssh-p
Greetings, Sorin Adrian Savu!
> Hello!
> I had to compile openssh recently, and the README for cygwin is referencing
> openssl-devel package which is obsolete now. I spent some time trying to
> figure this out. Can you please update
> https://github.com/openssh/openss
Hello!
I had to compile openssh recently, and the README for cygwin is referencing
openssl-devel package which is obsolete now. I spent some time trying to
figure this out. Can you please update
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/85ceb0e64bff672558fc87958cd548f135c83cdd/contrib
On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 12:47 -0600, Brian Inglis wrote:
> May be related to
> "gost.dll required but missing after latest Cygwin update"
> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2019-03/msg00511.html
Not exactly. BIND has a configure-time test for the GOST engine, which
is no longer b
May be related to
"gost.dll required but missing after latest Cygwin update"
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2019-03/msg00511.html
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* openssl-1.1.1b-1
* openssl-perl-1.1.1b-1
* libssl1.1-1.1.1b-1
* libssl-devel-1.1.1b-1
* libssl1.0-1.0.2r-2
* libssl1.0-devel-1.0.2r-2
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL
On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 14:47 -0700, Steven Penny wrote:
> Current Cygwin OpenSSL is 1.0.2r. However OpenSSL 1.1 has been available for
> several years now:
>
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/OpenSSL_1_1_0
We are well aware, and this delay was planned. 1.1 broke API
c
Current Cygwin OpenSSL is 1.0.2r. However OpenSSL 1.1 has been available for
several years now:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/OpenSSL_1_1_0
and certain libraries require OpenSSL 1.1:
https://github.com/curl/curl-for-win
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* openssl-1.0.2r-1
* openssl-devel-1.0.2r-1
* openssl-perl-1.0.2r-1
* libopenssl100-1.0.2r-1
The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between
machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and
On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 18:08 +, Anana, Lowell [US] (MS) wrote:
> Are there plans to make the openssl 1.0.2r package available to the cygwin
> community?
Yes, hopefully next week.
--
Yaakov
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygw
Are there plans to make the openssl 1.0.2r package available to the cygwin
community?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml
Hi all.
Are there plans to make the openssl 1.1.1 package available to the cygwin
community?
Also, fyi:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20181030.txt
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20181029.txt
Thank you and Thanks to all who make cygwin possible.
Gilbert P. St. Firmin
--
Problem
Are there plans to make the openssl 1.1.1 package available to the cygwin
community?
Also, fyi:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20181030.txt
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20181029.txt
Thank you and Thanks to all who make cygwin possible.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com
ygwin
and I have the following packages installed:
1.0.2p-1 openssl, openssl-devel, libopenssl100
openssh 7.8p1-1
This is how my id_rsa key looks like:
-BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
Proc-Type: 4,ENCRYPTED
DEK-Info: AES-128-CBC,56A6DA55614F68D86D817C504D1C690D
-END RSA PRIVATE KEY--
Hi folks,
I've updated the version of OpenSSL to 1.0.2p-1. This is a security
bugfix release.
Changes between 1.0.2o and 1.0.2p [14 Aug 2018]
*) Client DoS due to large DH parameter
During key agreement
Are there plans to make the openssl 1.0.2p package available to the cygwin
community?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml
On 7/21/2018 3:51 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> Am 21.07.2018 um 21:22 schrieb Takashi Yano:
>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:44:57 -0400
>> cyg Simple wrote:
>>> Uninstall openssl-devel 1.0.2o-1 (automatically added)
>>> Install libsqlite3-devel 3.21.0-1
>>> In
Am 21.07.2018 um 21:22 schrieb Takashi Yano:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:44:57 -0400
cyg Simple wrote:
Uninstall openssl-devel 1.0.2o-1 (automatically added)
Install libsqlite3-devel 3.21.0-1
Install openssl-devel 1.0.2o-1
I can't reproduce this.
$ cygcheck -c openssl-devel
Cygwin Pa
1 - 100 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
