Hi all,
this is my current patch for get running the lmbench-20 patch1 source from
http://www.bitmover.com
Content
* initial patches from me.
* Tim Prince lib_timing.c patch.
* patch for disabling rpc checking without adding a new file.
* bug fix of lat_select check (based on a hint of Chr
Hi all,
the last days I have run the lmbench benchmark suite with cygwin and Suse Linux 7.1 on
a Toshiba Satellite Pro 4300
Serie with PIII 700 MHz, 320 MB RAM.
I was very surprised about the differences in some tests. While some tests produces
expected results for example in
the "processor re
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 08:14:47PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> >while makeing some tests I recognized, that sometime select() and
> >close() crashes, if the number of used file descriptors is > 60.
>
> grep /usr/include/sys/types.h for "FD_SETSIZE". You'll note that it is,
> by default, 6
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 08:14:47PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>while makeing some tests I recognized, that sometime select() and
>close() crashes, if the number of used file descriptors is > 60.
grep /usr/include/sys/types.h for "FD_SETSIZE". You'll note that it is,
by default, 64. Set it to s
Hi all,
while makeing some tests I recognized, that sometime select() and close() crashes, if
the number of used file
descriptors is > 60.
With a value >93 select() crashes.
With a value between 61 and 81 a close() call crashes instead of select(), but it
seems that this is caused by the
previ
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Prince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 10:58 PM
> > To: Ralf Habacker
> > Cc: Cygwin
> > Subject: Re: Old Thread: Cygwin Performance
> >
> >
The QueryPerformance() calls a
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cygwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:13 AM
Subject: RE: Old Thread: Cygwin Performance
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Prince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 10:58 P
Thanks, this got it started. I may be able to try a few runs by the end of
the day.
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Habacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cygwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:13 AM
Subject: RE: Old Thread: Cygwin
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Prince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 10:58 PM
> To: Ralf Habacker
> Cc: Cygwin
> Subject: Re: Old Thread: Cygwin Performance
>
>
> Your patch adds lib_cygwin.c to the list of required source files,
t; 5. Because I don't have any compare of lmbench running time on other
platforms I can't say if
> this is okay. Some benchmarks need several minutes to run, but this may be
okay.
>
> Regards
> Ralf
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ralf Habacker"
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tim Prince" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Cygwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 10:29 AM
Subject: RE: Old Thread: Cygwin Performance
> > I'd suggest you offer your patch to the lmbench maintainers. At one
time,
&
alf
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ralf Habacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tim Prince" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Cygwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 11:44 AM
> Subject: RE: Old Thread: Cygwi
12 matches
Mail list logo