Re: OT: Re: merging mingw and cygwin

2003-10-16 Thread Paul G.
On 13 Oct 2003 at 23:13, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 05:35:38PM -0700, Paul G. wrote: > >Mingw is not included with Msys. Msys "can use" and "is capable of > >_recognizing_", Mingw. Msys != Mingw. Msys does not need Mingw to > >develop anything. > > > >Mingw and Msys a

Re: OT: Re: merging mingw and cygwin

2003-10-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 05:35:38PM -0700, Paul G. wrote: >Mingw is not included with Msys. Msys "can use" and "is capable of >_recognizing_", Mingw. Msys != Mingw. Msys does not need Mingw to >develop anything. > >Mingw and Msys are OT for this list. Bingo. Paul is right. Also Mingw doesn't n

OT: Re: merging mingw and cygwin

2003-10-13 Thread Paul G.
keeping in mind what someone else said about flame wars... On 13 Oct 2003 at 15:45, Edward Peschko wrote: > > Just because they are available does not mean you need to use them! > > Look I asked you if you were able to build Windows only applications > > using -mno-cygwin. You failed to answer th