-4RaCKZIBI3gqNZQ-ukcWIcDVhFvJeCSJAYk5YqqbhEQVNMG0ywIIwJzOrWWU-Vx8pyxX3j_lKMei7lkiv2r6LHih73fa_fzC2sU3bxajOUEmGBtTzem-7en879UHHsvqY9rI-26B-ljG6afgcAAP__DvV6WA
). Legal Notice
Mailbox upgrade
Dear cygwin@cygwin.com,
Your e-mail account storage limit is almost full, you may not be able to send
or receive multiple messages, please upgrade your e-mail quota limit to
continue using your mailbox effectively. This service is free
U
> Â 3 [main] zip2john 4752 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute
>FAST_CWD pointer. Please report this problem to
>the public mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
>ver 14Â images.zip->File 13-11-2015 09 04 06.jpeg PKZIP Encr:
>cmplen=2310085, decmplen=2315422, crc=4B8B28CB
>ver 14Â images.zip->F
3 [main] zip2john 4752 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute
FAST_CWD pointer. Please report this problem to
the public mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
ver 14 images.zip->File 13-11-2015 09 04 06.jpeg PKZIP Encr:
cmplen=2310085, decmplen=2315422, crc=4B8B28CB
ver 14 images.zip->File 13-11-
On 2018-08-26 15:41, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>> PS1="\[\e[1;32m\]\h \! $ \[\e[0m\] "
>> The real issue is that I still have no real clue on how these escape
>> sequences work!! ...
> `man bash`, section PROMPTING
$ LESS='+/^\s*PROMPTING' man bash
Mostly provided with GNU programs, info often h
...
PS1="\[\e[1;32m\]\h \! $ \[\e[0m\] "
The real issues is that I still have no real clue on how these escape
sequences work!! ...
`man bash`, section PROMPTING; the \[ and \] are not escape sequences
for the terminal but meta syntax in the prompt, telling the shell that
the string
rintable
Many thanks, TW, for your hint. I have "solved" the problem, but I do not
understand why it works! I took time to test it for a few days to make
sure that things were ok. Hence the slow response. If I had only also
included my prompt in the original email, I think that you would
;>>>> may be present in earlier versions, too.
>>>>>>> Russinovich's coreinfo is shown below
>>>>>>> (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/coreinfo).
>>>>>>> Notice /proc/cpuinfo is missing a
>>> may be present in earlier versions, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Russinovich's coreinfo is shown below
>>>>>> (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/coreinfo).
>>>>>> Notice /proc/cpuinfo is missing aesni, pcl
gt;>>
>>>>> I'm working on an AMD A6-9220 and seeing unusual results from
>>>>> /proc/cpuinfo. I think this may be an issue with the latest Cygwin. It
>>>>> may be present in earlier versions, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Russinovi
Greetings, Erik Soderquist!
> The automation details are primarily what I'm after, though it could
> have been something like ZFS with deduplication turned on
You can, indeed, achieve similar level of magic of a general purpose savings
with ZFS or BTRFS.
I'm using BTRFS snapshots to keep intermed
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> Greetings, Erik,
>
> A good magician never reveals how the trick works. 8^)
>
> Sadly I'm not a good magician.
>
> It's not all that complicated, if you think about it. Each time a new
> setup.ini is generated only a hand full of packages
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Erik Soderquist wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:16:53 -0500
From: Erik Soderquist
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not
very nice at all.
Greetings, Erik,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter A. Castro
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> And for those who think keeping a private mirror is trivial, let me give you
> some stats. A full snapshot of Cygwin, 32-bit + 64-bit (+noarch) + source
> packages (Current and Previous) is about 137Gb. Don't believe me? Your
> setup.ini h
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Brian Inglis wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:45:32 -0700
From: Brian Inglis
Subject: Re: Complaining after fair notice of dropping XP support. Was: Not
very nice at all.
On 2016-11-10 00:24, Fergus wrote:
1. Use the following version of setup*.exe:
32-bit:
ftp
-X option, using the following
> > > > mirror:
> > > > 32-bit:
> > > > ftp://www.fruitbat.org/pub/cygwin/circa/2016/08/30/104223
> > Q1 Any ideas of what might be de-railing this simple operation?
>
> See notice on throttling Cygwin Time Machine beca
Any ideas of what might be de-railing this simple operation?
See notice on throttling Cygwin Time Machine because of abuse:
http://www.fruitbat.org/Cygwin/timemachine.html
advises using only setup on as few required packages as possible
at a time, until abuse stops.
Q2 [... virtual
>> Activating mod_slotmem_shm (as a shared module) resolved this issue and
>> allowed httpd to start. However, httpd now produces the following notice
>> on (successful) startup:
>>
>> [Mon Jul 25 09:27:40.718810 2016] [lbmethod_heartbeat:notice] [pid2345
>> Activating mod_slotmem_shm (as a shared module) resolved this issue and
>> allowed httpd to start. However, httpd now produces the following notice
>> on (successful) startup:
>>
>> [Mon Jul 25 09:27:40.718810 2016] [lbmethod_heartbeat:notice] [pid
faa.gov> writes:
> Activating mod_slotmem_shm (as a shared module) resolved this issue and
allowed httpd to start. However,
> httpd now produces the following notice on (successful) startup:
>
> [Mon Jul 25 09:27:40.718810 2016] [lbmethod_heartbeat:notice] [pid
2345] AH02
d_slotmem_shm loaded??
Activating mod_slotmem_shm (as a shared module) resolved this issue and allowed
httpd to start. However, httpd now produces the following notice on
(successful) startup:
[Mon Jul 25 09:27:40.718810 2016] [lbmethod_heartbeat:notice] [pid 2345]
AH02282: No slotmem from mod_heartmo
Bump. Any word on this? We would like to solve this before our
customers run into the problem and having any diagnostics tips would
be greatly appreciated. We are also in a bind because we have run
this by the Qt maintainers and they say they won't fix it.
Thanks,
Tom
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Tom Kacvinsky
wrote:
> It turns out we are using the 32 bit version of cygwin, so I am going
> to try with 64 bit cygwin and the latest possible version and see how
> I fare.
Happens with both 32 and 64 bit cygwin. I'm out of ideas. The
developer here that I ha
Dear Corinna Vinschen,
It is my pleasure communicating with you as I have a good proposal
which I want to introduce to you. Kindly get back to me for more
details.
Best regard.
Yours faithfully,
Neal J. Drake
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http:
It turns out we are using the 32 bit version of cygwin, so I am going
to try with 64 bit cygwin and the latest possible version and see how
I fare.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Tom Kacvinsky
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Tom Kacvinsky
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jon Turney
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2015 16:17, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
>
> On Mo
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Tom Kacvinsky
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jon Turney
> wrote:
>> On 07/12/2015 16:17, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
>
> On 04/1
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 07/12/2015 16:17, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 04/12/2015 14:20, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
>
> We have an interesti
On 07/12/2015 16:17, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 04/12/2015 14:20, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
We have an interesting problem whereby an Linux X client application
crashes when running the X server on
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Tom Kacvinsky
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Jon Turney
> wrote:
>> On 04/12/2015 14:20, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have an interesting problem whereby an Linux X client application
>>> crashes when running the X server on cygwin. We
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 04/12/2015 14:20, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have an interesting problem whereby an Linux X client application
>> crashes when running the X server on cygwin. We have a reproducer
>> for the problem, but it is a Qt example appli
On 04/12/2015 14:20, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
Hi,
We have an interesting problem whereby an Linux X client application
crashes when running the X server on cygwin. We have a reproducer
for the problem, but it is a Qt example application stored in a tarball.
We have gathered the other information t
Hi.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Tom Kacvinsky
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have an interesting problem whereby an Linux X client application
> crashes when running the X server on cygwin. We have a reproducer
> for the problem, but it is a Qt example application stored in a tarball.
>
> We have gathe
Hi,
We have an interesting problem whereby an Linux X client application
crashes when running the X server on cygwin. We have a reproducer
for the problem, but it is a Qt example application stored in a tarball.
We have gathered the other information that would typically be requested.
I just nee
File locking is failing with Cygwin 2.4.0-0.2 as well. Thank you for
allowing the possibility of downgrading the Cygwin base package down
to 2.2.1-1 via setup.
Best regards,
Mario
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Helmut Karlowski
wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen
> Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:32:14 +0200
> ---
>
> > Now that Windows 2003 is finally out of long term support, and given
> > that XP's much-too-long-term support ended 2014, I'll
out asking, etc.).
I hope I can customize it to behave like XP (only the goodies of
course).
http://classicshell.net
That doesn't solve the hotkeys bound at driver levels, unfortunately.
Half of my keyboard dead now thanks to the move to Win7.
Anyway, on the topic: All I could ask is to g
ehave like XP (only the goodies of
>>>> course).
>>
>>> http://classicshell.net
>>
>> That doesn't solve the hotkeys bound at driver levels, unfortunately.
>> Half of my keyboard dead now thanks to the move to Win7.
>>
>> Anyway, on the t
t;>
> >>> I hope I can customize it to behave like XP (only the goodies of
> >>> course).
> >
> >> http://classicshell.net
> >
> > That doesn't solve the hotkeys bound at driver levels, unfortunately.
> > Half of my keyboard dead now th
AC sent the following at Wednesday, August 26, 2015 10:57 PM
>On 2015-08-26 18:04, Andrey Repin wrote: Well rsync is fine for making
>>> Is there a document somewhere that can describe this process of making a
>>> mirror? I have two XP machines that I won't be able to upgrade and I
>>> just want t
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>> >> That doesn't solve the hotkeys bound at driver levels, unfortunately.
>> >> Half of my keyboard dead now thanks to the move to Win7.
>>
>> > I don't understand this one. Quick explanation, please, even if it's OT?
>>
>> I was using Win+Arrows to switch between
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, AC wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:30:27 -0700
From: AC
Subject: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Early Deprecation Notice: Windows XP and
Server 2003 support
On 2015-08-26 06:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 26 August 2015 at 07:42, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Stephen
net
>
> That doesn't solve the hotkeys bound at driver levels, unfortunately.
> Half of my keyboard dead now thanks to the move to Win7.
>
> Anyway, on the topic: All I could ask is to give us a notice when the final
> build for XP is available, so that we could prepare own
On Aug 27 02:42, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>
> > On Aug 26 15:23, Andrey Repin wrote:
> >> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
> >>
> >> > On Aug 26 12:56, Helmut Karlowski wrote:
> >> >> > > Guess that's better than to stick with the kludges, migration to 10
> >> >> > > is
> >
Greetings, AC!
>>> Is there a document somewhere that can describe this process of making a
>>> mirror? I have two XP machines that I won't be able to upgrade and I
>>> just want to make sure I can reinstall Cygwin packages if needed.
>>
>> man rsync
>>
>>
> Well rsync is fine for making mirro
On 2015-08-26 18:04, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, AC!
>
>> Is there a document somewhere that can describe this process of making a
>> mirror? I have two XP machines that I won't be able to upgrade and I
>> just want to make sure I can reinstall Cygwin packages if needed.
>
> man rsync
>
>
Greetings, AC!
> Is there a document somewhere that can describe this process of making a
> mirror? I have two XP machines that I won't be able to upgrade and I
> just want to make sure I can reinstall Cygwin packages if needed.
You'll also need to specify your mirror address in the command line
Greetings, AC!
> Is there a document somewhere that can describe this process of making a
> mirror? I have two XP machines that I won't be able to upgrade and I
> just want to make sure I can reinstall Cygwin packages if needed.
man rsync
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Thursday, August 27
On 2015-08-26 06:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 26 August 2015 at 07:42, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, Stephen John Smoogen!
>>
>>>> Anyway, on the topic: All I could ask is to give us a notice when the final
>>>> build for XP is availabl
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
> On Aug 26 15:23, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>>
>> > On Aug 26 12:56, Helmut Karlowski wrote:
>> >> > > Guess that's better than to stick with the kludges, migration to 10 is
>> >> > > on the way.
>> >> > From what I've seen and heard W10, wh
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Now that Windows 2003 is finally out of long term support, and given
> that XP's much-too-long-term support ended 2014, I'll drop support for
> XP and Server 2003 from Cygwin End of 2015.
Good, and thanks! There's no reason XP users can'
On Aug 26 15:23, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>
> > On Aug 26 12:56, Helmut Karlowski wrote:
> >> > > Guess that's better than to stick with the kludges, migration to 10 is
> >> > > on the way.
> >> > From what I've seen and heard W10, while mostly stable, still coerces
> >>
2015-08-26 15:42 GMT+02:00 Andrey Repin:
> And since Vista+ doesn't have support for 16-bit subsystem, I need XP VM to
> compile my projects.
AFAIK the 16-bit subsystem has nothing to do with XP vs Vista+. It has
to do with 32-bit OS vs 64-bit OS. Have you tried a 32 bit Win7 (or
maybe even a 32-b
On 26 August 2015 at 07:42, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Stephen John Smoogen!
>
>>> Anyway, on the topic: All I could ask is to give us a notice when the final
>>> build for XP is available, so that we could prepare own mirrors.
>
>> You will need more than
Greetings, Stephen John Smoogen!
>> Anyway, on the topic: All I could ask is to give us a notice when the final
>> build for XP is available, so that we could prepare own mirrors.
> You will need more than mirrors. You will need to set up a parallel
> stack of builders and o
gt;
> That doesn't solve the hotkeys bound at driver levels, unfortunately.
> Half of my keyboard dead now thanks to the move to Win7.
>
> Anyway, on the topic: All I could ask is to give us a notice when the final
> build for XP is available, so that we could prepare own mirro
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Helmut Karlowski
wrote:
>
> Corinna Vinschen
>
> > > Unfortulately I think I'm bound to windows which is all malware anyway
> > > since1991 ;)
> >
> > Heh.
>
> But thanks cygwin it's a place where I can live :-)
At Flock (Fedora Contributor Conference), I met peop
ng, etc.).
>>
>> I hope I can customize it to behave like XP (only the goodies of
>> course).
> http://classicshell.net
That doesn't solve the hotkeys bound at driver levels, unfortunately.
Half of my keyboard dead now thanks to the move to Win7.
Anyway, on the topic: All I cou
Corinna Vinschen
> > Unfortulately I think I'm bound to windows which is all malware anyway
> > since1991 ;)
>
> Heh.
But thanks cygwin it's a place where I can live :-)
-Helmut
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentati
On Aug 26 12:56, Helmut Karlowski wrote:
> > > Guess that's better than to stick with the kludges, migration to 10 is
> > > on the way.
> > From what I've seen and heard W10, while mostly stable, still coerces users
> > towards the software as (an expensive) service model and follows the dictum
> >
> Good luck finding all the Microsoft spyware. From what I can tell, Win 10
> defaults to reporting almost everything to the company for their spam
> servers to use.
>From my first inspection the remote-adress is something with akamai
(may differ in other regions). I did shut them all down with
> I hope I can customize it [Win 10] to behave like XP (only the goodies of
course). And shutdown/disable all the spying internet-connections.
Good luck finding all the Microsoft spyware. From what I can tell, Win 10
defaults to reporting almost everything to the company for their spam
servers to
> > Guess that's better than to stick with the kludges, migration to 10 is
> > on the way.
> From what I've seen and heard W10, while mostly stable, still coerces users
> towards the software as (an expensive) service model and follows the dictum
> that Microsoft knows more about what you want than
> > Now that Windows 2003 is finally out of long term support, and given
> > that XP's much-too-long-term support ended 2014, I'll drop support for
> > XP and Server 2003 from Cygwin End of 2015.
> He - I'm still on XP!
So am I. Windows 7 doesn't have some features I rely on and Windows 8.X was
a
Corinna Vinschen
Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:32:14 +0200
---
> Now that Windows 2003 is finally out of long term support, and given
> that XP's much-too-long-term support ended 2014, I'll drop support for
> XP and Server 2003 from Cygwin End of 2015.
He -
Hi folks,
Now that Windows 2003 is finally out of long term support, and given
that XP's much-too-long-term support ended 2014, I'll drop support for
XP and Server 2003 from Cygwin End of 2015.
At this point I'll remove all my XP and 2003 test installations which
are already going mouldy for a l
Thank you for your replies.
The permission of files under ~/.ssh can't be changed to 600 when
their group owner is None. I have to chgrp -R Users (or
Administrators, or any other group name other than None) ~/.ssh to
make it possible to run chmod on them. I suppose this is a bug of
cygwin on Windo
We are sorry, but this discussion does not exist. Your recent message to
(Returned mail: Data format error) was rejected.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:
Yup, that's the output I get on my 32-bit windows machine, I'm not
seeing any value in environment for 'TERM'.
Are you referring to PATH?
%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem;c:\cygwin\bin;c:\cygwin\usr\bin;c:\cygwin\sbin;c:\cygwin\usr\sbin;C:\Program
Files (x86)\OpenSSH\bi
Hi. This is the smtp delivery program.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
, directly server said: 553 mailbox not found
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Received: from d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at _ource_are._rg.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
> addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't
> work out.
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry, your message has been denied du
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:52:44PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
> > >At 01:13 AM 10/5/2003, Christopher Faylor you wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Oh, and I probably have to say that the gcc 3.3.1 package will still be
> > >>available.
> > >
> > >Yes but will
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:52:44PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
> >At 01:13 AM 10/5/2003, Christopher Faylor you wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Oh, and I probably have to say that the gcc 3.3.1 package will still be
> >>available.
> >
> >Yes but will it work with B20??? ;-)
>
> I don't think it's even an issue.
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:52:44PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>At 01:13 AM 10/5/2003, Christopher Faylor you wrote:
>
>
>>Oh, and I probably have to say that the gcc 3.3.1 package will still be
>>available.
>
>Yes but will it work with B20??? ;-)
I don't think it's even an issue. B20 compiles files
At 01:13 AM 10/5/2003, Christopher Faylor you wrote:
>Oh, and I probably have to say that the gcc 3.3.1 package will still be
>available.
Yes but will it work with B20??? ;-)
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779
I don't have the time or the inclination to support gcc 2.95 (aka the
gcc2 package). That fact wasn't a really big deal until David
Billinghurst pointed out that the package contained a serious flaw. So,
rather than subject people to a broken g++, I will be end-of-lifing the
gcc2 package next wee
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:08:08 GMT, "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in news:8-1996164353.20021112220808@;familiehaase.de:
Soren:
>> on Cygwin, there is always going to be more than one
>> canonical-ly-correct way to refer to a file by path name (!!):
> [...]
>
>> So my present analys
Hallo Soren,
Am Dienstag, 12. November 2002 um 08:04 schriebst du:
> [posted today to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (via Gmane) in order to try to get Cygwin's worthies in the loop].
> Subject: Where it runs or what it Does?? (RFC)
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:56:00 -0500
[..
[posted today to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(via Gmane) in order to try to get Cygwin's worthies in the loop].
Subject: Where it runs or what it Does?? (RFC)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:56:00 -0500
---
[[EMAIL PROT
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.htm
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.
- Original Message -
From: "Rajat Bawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 02:31
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 09:02, Charles Wilson wrote:
> To sum up: I think you should release "regex-4.4-3" that only contains
> /usr/bin/cygregex.dll -- and nothing else. (this guarantees that new
> packages cannot acquire a dependency on cygregex). And then just let it
> sit for several months,
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:42:16AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>>Hmmmthis is disquieting. Let's assume that Bob has built, on his
>>machine, the "HandyMedicineDatabase" application which depends on
>>cygregex.dll.
>>
>>He can now no longer install HMD on a ne
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:42:16AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Hmmmthis is disquieting. Let's assume that Bob has built, on his
> machine, the "HandyMedicineDatabase" application which depends on
> cygregex.dll.
>
> He can now no longer install HMD on a new machine, unless he carries
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>
> Since Cygwin 1.3.7, the Cygwin API contains the POSIX regex calls.
>
> For that reason, the "regex" package is no longer needed, except other
> packages depend on it.
>
> The only package in
Since Cygwin 1.3.7, the Cygwin API contains the POSIX regex calls.
For that reason, the "regex" package is no longer needed, except other
packages depend on it.
The only package in the Cygwin net distribution which was dep
Original Message
Subject: failure notice
Date: 8 Jan 2002 03:43:17 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ryan T. Sammartino wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:34:39PM +0100, David Portabella wrote:
>
>>in the actual cygwin, the last version of g
86 matches
Mail list logo
