Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

I posted the same thing last month and no one seems to care. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00599.html Hi, A while back there was some talk about the feasibility of a Cygwin-based Mozilla. In perusing the release notes for Mozilla 1.4 (

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

Larry Hall wrote: > Michael F. March wrote: > >> I posted the same thing last month and no one seems to care. >> >> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00599.html >> > > Define 'care'. I personally find this interesting. However, I > felt no burning need to share my sentiments on the subje

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

Michael, Oh, yeah... Another "D'Oh!" moment: Now that you mention it, I remember your post. Sorry to act like it was a discovery. Apparently the people who earlier mentioned an interest in Mozilla under Cygwin / Cygwin-XFree86 had only an idle interest. I'll admit it's not a priority for me, I

Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

Hi, A while back there was some talk about the feasibility of a Cygwin-based Mozilla. In perusing the release notes for Mozilla 1.4 () I noticed this: - As of Mozilla 1.4b, it is possible to build Mozilla for Win32 using GCC. See the win32 build