Re: More on Cygwin package naming

2011-09-05 Thread Luke Kendall
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: Luke Kendall wrote on Sunday, September 04, 2011, at 11:16 PM In my previous mail I may have used the wrong term ("package"): the term "package" seems to refer to each .tar.bz2 file (for the source and install files of each version). So perhaps I sho

RE: More on Cygwin package naming

2011-09-05 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
Luke Kendall wrote on Sunday, September 04, 2011, at 11:16 PM >In my previous mail I may have used the wrong term ("package"): the term >"package" seems to refer to each .tar.bz2 file (for the source and >install files of each version). So perhaps I should instead be talking >about "@-names" -

Re: More on Cygwin package naming

2011-09-04 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 9/4/2011 11:15 PM, Luke Kendall wrote: It would be /nice/ if someone could confirm that the upstream project name is used for the @-names, or at least that cygwin does not use any existing Freshmeat project name and apply it to different software. FWIW, I think it's fair to say that there is

More on Cygwin package naming

2011-09-04 Thread Luke Kendall
In my previous mail I may have used the wrong term ("package"): the term "package" seems to refer to each .tar.bz2 file (for the source and install files of each version). So perhaps I should instead be talking about "@-names" - the name that appears after an "@" in setup.ini. Anyway, this is