Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 5 17:23, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 4 17:24, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:25:27PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
The test also appears very clean on Linux. The gfortran library is
implemented in C. I need to exam
On Feb 5 17:23, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Feb 4 17:24, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:25:27PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
The test also appears very clean on Linux. The gfortran library is
implemented in C. I need to examine some du
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 4 17:24, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:25:27PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
The test also appears very clean on Linux. The gfortran library is
implemented in C. I need to examine some dumps from the compiler and I
will get back with you of
On Feb 4 17:24, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:25:27PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> >The test also appears very clean on Linux. The gfortran library is
> >implemented in C. I need to examine some dumps from the compiler and I
> >will get back with you off list if I don't
Dave Korn wrote:
On 04 February 2008 22:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:25:27PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
The test also appears very clean on Linux. The gfortran library is
implemented in C. I need to examine some dumps from the compiler and I
will get back with yo
On 04 February 2008 22:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:25:27PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>> The test also appears very clean on Linux. The gfortran library is
>> implemented in C. I need to examine some dumps from the compiler and I
>> will get back with you off list
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:25:27PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>The test also appears very clean on Linux. The gfortran library is
>implemented in C. I need to examine some dumps from the compiler and I
>will get back with you off list if I don't spot the problem.
I am fairly certain that Corinn
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 3 11:24, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
I have confirmed this problem on Cygwin reported here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063
I am not very familiar with the windows environment. Having patched most
of the gfortran I/O library in the last 2-3 years I
On Feb 3 19:03, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> I have continued my testing here and I am seeing this with valgrind on
> linux. When I was running the 1 loops I did not see these errors roll
> by upfront initially.
>
> ==25454== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==25454==
On Feb 3 11:24, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> I have confirmed this problem on Cygwin reported here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063
>
> I am not very familiar with the windows environment. Having patched most
> of the gfortran I/O library in the last 2-3 years I can say that we d
Angelo Graziosi wrote:
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
I have confirmed this problem on Cygwin reported here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063
I do not know if this can help, but...
Building the above test with G95, it does not fail!
If I have understood it, I have pressed 1 ENTER
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
I have confirmed this problem on Cygwin reported here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063
I do not know if this can help, but...
Building the above test with G95, it does not fail!
If I have understood it, I have pressed 1 ENTER without problem!
With
Dave Korn wrote:
On 03 February 2008 19:24, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
I have confirmed this problem on Cygwin reported here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063
Those of you most familiar with the Windows environment could perhaps help
here. Is this a bug in Cygwin memory manag
On 03 February 2008 19:24, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> I have confirmed this problem on Cygwin reported here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063
> Those of you most familiar with the Windows environment could perhaps help
> here. Is this a bug in Cygwin memory management?
Ar
On 2008-02-03 19:24Z, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063
[...]
> Is this a bug in Cygwin memory management?
According to this report (marked in bugzilla as a duplicate):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35064
a similar problem was observed
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
I have confirmed this problem on Cygwin reported here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063
I am not very familiar with the windows environment. Having patched
most of the gfortran I/O library in the last 2-3 years I can say that
we do a lot of memory alloca
I have confirmed this problem on Cygwin reported here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063
I am not very familiar with the windows environment. Having patched most of the
gfortran I/O library in the last 2-3 years I can say that we do a lot of memory
allocation for I/O.
On Lin
17 matches
Mail list logo
