Charles D. Russell wrote:
Dante Chialvo wrote:
I think the following quote is from a message of mine...
> I have the same problem. I have g77, g95 and >grfortran (gfc)
installed (see below). With >heap_chunk_in_mb set to 1024, on a machine
with >1024 MiB RAM< I can run a simple Fortran >program
Dante Chialvo wrote:
> I have the same problem. I have g77, g95 and >grfortran (gfc)
installed (see below). With >heap_chunk_in_mb set to 1024, on a machine
with >1024 MiB RAM< I can run a simple Fortran >program with an array of
up to ~ 1023 MiB. With >g77 & gfc the limit is 156 MiB and beyond
Dave Korn wrote:
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mark Hadfield
Sent: 10 January 2005 21:18
Is there a cure that would allow a simple-minded, grey-haired Fortran
programmer like me to rely on Cygwin g77 (or gfortran) for
moderate-sized computational tasks?
LOL, I love the subtle sense of understa
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mark Hadfield
> Sent: 10 January 2005 21:18
> Is there a cure that would allow a simple-minded, grey-haired Fortran
> programmer like me to rely on Cygwin g77 (or gfortran) for
> moderate-sized computational tasks?
LOL, I love the
Dave Korn wrote:
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mark Hadfield
Dante R. Chialvo wrote:
2) Use g77 using the Wl option, ie,
g77 -O2 -o mybigprogram -Wl,--stack,1 mybigprogram.f
That's odd. Increasing the stack size definitely does not
work for me.
It just causes the program to terminate
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mark Hadfield
> Sent: 09 January 2005 21:27
> Dante R. Chialvo wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestions
> > Bottom line both ideas work fine in my case:
> >
> > 1) Install the g95 compiler,
> > or
> > 2) Use g77 using the Wl option, ie,
Dante R. Chialvo wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions
Bottom line both ideas work fine in my case:
1) Install the g95 compiler,
or
2) Use g77 using the Wl option, ie,
g77 -O2 -o mybigprogram -Wl,--stack,1 mybigprogram.f
So thanks a lot,
That's odd. Increasing the stack size definitely
Thanks for the suggestions
Bottom line both ideas work fine in my case:
1) Install the g95 compiler,
or
2) Use g77 using the Wl option, ie,
g77 -O2 -o mybigprogram -Wl,--stack,1 mybigprogram.f
So thanks a lot,
Dante
Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cy
Dave Korn wrote:
It may also be possible to workaround the problem by fooling around with the
default stack allocation size; this can have knock-on effects which clear up the
reserved area of the process' memory map that error message is complaining
about.
See
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mark Hadfield
> Sent: 06 January 2005 00:58
> Dante Chialvo wrote:
> > I have similar problem than the one posted a while ago in
> >
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg00842.html
> >
> > Using cygwin/g77, in a PC with 102
Dante Chialvo wrote:
I have similar problem than the one posted a while ago in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg00842.html
Using cygwin/g77, in a PC with 1024 Mb of physical memory.
After compiling and running the following test program
the limit of 160 Mb cannot be surpassed.
implici
I have similar problem than the one posted a while ago in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg00842.html
Using cygwin/g77, in a PC with 1024 Mb of physical memory.
After compiling and running the following test program
the limit of 160 Mb cannot be surpassed.
implicit double precision
The problem seems specific to g77. After increasing the allocated memory as
the respondents suggested, I can now access 1 Gb in C but am still limited
to a little over 240 Mb (256?) in g77, evidence by a runtime crash with no
error message. Curiously, max_memory showed some 700 Mb even before I r
I tried the procedure cited in the user manual, but the test program fails
with message "shell returned 128" when I try to add a second matrix of the
same size. Initially, max_memory indicated insufficient memory so, I
increased the virtual memory limits (Windows XP Pro) to initial 1536, max
2048.
Cool - I'll redirect to that next time :)
thx!
rlc
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:20:58AM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> >This is getting to be a FAQ...
> >
> >There is a (configurable) limit to the amount of memory Cygwin can
> >allocate.
>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:20:58AM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>This is getting to be a FAQ...
>
>There is a (configurable) limit to the amount of memory Cygwin can
>allocate.
>
>Charles Werner explains this pretty well in:
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg00234.html
>he a
This is getting to be a FAQ...
There is a (configurable) limit to the amount of memory Cygwin can
allocate.
Charles Werner explains this pretty well in:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg00234.html
he also explains how to change the settings
ciao
rlc
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Charles
Using cygwin/g77, I was happy with a memory limitation of something over 240
Mb when I was using a laptop with 64 Mb of physical memory. However, I
recently acquired a new PC with 512 Mb of physical memory and found that the
memory available for array allocation did not increase, remaining little
18 matches
Mail list logo
