Thanks for posting that for me, Brian. I was going to get back to that to check
for a response myself, but it has been a busy week!
From: Brian Inglis
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Malwarebytes flags qdbusviewer-qt5
On 2017-03-20 07:53, Ed Koerber via cygwin wrote:
> On Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:20 PM, Ed Koerber via cygwin wrote:
>> I am using the following version of cygwin on a Windows 7 computer:
>> $ uname -a
>> CYGWIN_NT-6.1 e250 2.6.0(0.304/5/3) 2016-08-31 14:27 i686 Cygwin
>> Why does Malwarebytes fl
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com"
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:20 PM
Subject: Malwarebytes flags qdbusviewer-qt5.exe as Adware.Elex malware
I am using the following version of cygwin on a Windows 7 computer:
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 e250 2.6.0(0.304/5/3) 2016-08-31 14:27 i686 Cygwin
On 03/19/2017 01:23 PM, René Berber wrote:
On 3/19/2017 12:18 PM, Ed Koerber via cygwin wrote:
It bears asking to be thorough... are we sure that the cygwin package
has not been compromised somehow?
You are correct in not taking unsubstantiated remarks as useful.
We usually run the program
On 2017-03-19 12:18, Ed Koerber via cygwin wrote:
> On Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:32 PM, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Ed Koerber via cygwin wrote:
>>> I am using the following version of cygwin on a Windows 7 computer:
>>> $ uname -a
>>> CYGWIN_NT-6.1 e250 2.6.0(0.304/5/3)
On 3/19/2017 6:05 PM, Chris Johnson wrote:
> Don't virus scanners in general get caught by other virus scanner
> because their databases have the same signatures as the viruses they
> look for? I don't know how to get around this other than an exclusion
> list.
Off-topic, this has nothing to do
Back to the list, and keep it there.
Forwarded Message
From: Chris Johnson
To: Do not reply
I'm probably going to catch hell for this.
Don't virus scanners in general get caught by other virus scanner
because their databases have the same signatures as the viruses they
lo
On 3/19/2017 12:18 PM, Ed Koerber via cygwin wrote:
> It bears asking to be thorough... are we sure that the cygwin package
> has not been compromised somehow?
You are correct in not taking unsubstantiated remarks as useful.
We usually run the program in question through https://www.virustotal.c
It bears asking to be thorough... are we sure that the cygwin package has not
been compromised somehow?
From: Ray Donnelly
To: Ed Koerber ; cygwin@cygwin.com
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: Malwarebytes flags qdbusviewer-qt5.exe as Adware.Elex
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Ed Koerber via cygwin
wrote:
> I am using the following version of cygwin on a Windows 7 computer:
>
> $ uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-6.1 e250 2.6.0(0.304/5/3) 2016-08-31 14:27 i686 Cygwin
>
> Why does Malwarebytes flag this file:
>
> C:\cygwin\usr\x86_64-w64-mingw32\sys-r
I am using the following version of cygwin on a Windows 7 computer:
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 e250 2.6.0(0.304/5/3) 2016-08-31 14:27 i686 Cygwin
Why does Malwarebytes flag this file:
C:\cygwin\usr\x86_64-w64-mingw32\sys-root\mingw\bin\qdbusviewer-qt5.exe
as Adware.Elex malware?
--
Problem
11 matches
Mail list logo
