On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 11:52 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to skaller on 2/18/2006 11:39 AM:
> > I have found some unexpected differences between Cygwin
> > and Linux. FYI I think Cygwin is right, and Linux is wrong.
>
> No, they are both right, in their own way. Windows .dlls cannot use
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to skaller on 2/18/2006 11:39 AM:
> I have found some unexpected differences between Cygwin
> and Linux. FYI I think Cygwin is right, and Linux is wrong.
No, they are both right, in their own way. Windows .dlls cannot use
undefined symbols,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 05:39:41AM +1100, skaller wrote:
>I have found some unexpected differences between Cygwin and Linux. FYI
>I think Cygwin is right, and Linux is wrong.
>
>What happens is I have a DLL P which depends on a DLL F and a DLL D. A
>also depends on R. The executable depends on R
I have found some unexpected differences between Cygwin
and Linux. FYI I think Cygwin is right, and Linux is wrong.
What happens is I have a DLL P which depends on a DLL F and
a DLL D. A also depends on R. The executable depends on
R D and F.
Under Linux, I link P against F, and it works.
IMHO th
4 matches
Mail list logo
