Greetings, Kal Sze!
> It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
> purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed.
No.
> Do we now only
> rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?
Been like that all the time.
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Thursday,
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Kal Sze wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
> purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only
> rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?
It was never code signed and the reaso
Hello,
It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only
rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?
Cheers,
Kal
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cyg
Thanks, Milan Řezníček
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brian Dessent
Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 12:53 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Latest setup.exe issue
Milan Reznicek wrote:
> I found a minor problem with lat
Milan Reznicek wrote:
> I found a minor problem with latest setup.exe I downloaded today in
> the morning. It doesn't care about colors being set as default by
This has been fixed for some time. The fix is in the current setup.exe
snapshot but the last release version was
Hi,
I found a minor problem with latest setup.exe I downloaded today in
the morning. It doesn't care about colors being set as default by system and
in the TreeView when you select particular parts of cygwin to be installed
it explicitly sets background color of nodes to white but do
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 03:56, Joseph Davida wrote:
> I got around the problem by removing the
> old C:\cygwin (actually by renaming it
> to cygwin.old) and restarting the setup.exe.
>
> So it appears current setup.exe will cause this
> problem on Win2K if it installs on top of an
> exsisting insta
Nop! package dir is
c:\downloads\cygwin\packages.
Joe
--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 03:56, Joseph Davida wrote:
> > I got around the problem by removing the
> > old C:\cygwin (actually by renaming it
> > to cygwin.old) and restarting the setup.exe.
> >
>
I got around the problem by removing the
old C:\cygwin (actually by renaming it
to cygwin.old) and restarting the setup.exe.
So it appears current setup.exe will cause this
problem on Win2K if it installs on top of an
exsisting installation.
Cheers,
Joe
Joseph Davida wrote:
>I tried the beta v
I tried the beta version Max suggested and it also
exhibits the same behaviour on my win2k laptop;
i.e. sucks up huge mem (depletes VM), and yet after
more than 1 hour of running, it still says 1% of
base-files 1.1-1 is installed. The "total" progress
meter shows only about a sliver of "progress" :
Please keep replies on list!
Joseph I. Davida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears that this setup.exe is depleting the VM pool.
> There is either a bad memory leak problem, or there
> is a boundless recursion in the calls. I suspect the
> it is a memory leak problem.
> The machine has 512M sd
Joseph I. Davida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The latest setup.exe dies with the following
Latest release (2.249.2.5) or latest beta (2.303) ?
> error banner titled: Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Error
>
> Runtime Error
> Program: C:\download\cygwin\setup.exe
>
> A
The latest setup.exe dies with the following
error banner titled: Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Error
Runtime Error
Program: C:\download\cygwin\setup.exe
Abnormal Program termination
This happens after about 1% of the
Lee Goddard wrote:
>
> Sorry - forgot the obvious: it is the latest version at the
> time of writing, which is 2.218.2.8.
>
> >
>
>> >
>> > Hi there.
>> >
>> > The latest setup.exe fails on my system: 100% CPU indefinetly
&
At 16:20 15/05/2002 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>Hello Lee,
Hi
>On the 4th setup page (screen) you are prompted for "Local Package
>Directory". I am interested of the contents of the directory you
>entered on that screen and in any subdirectories of the above
>directory which loook like URLs.
So
Hello Lee,
On the 4th setup page (screen) you are prompted for "Local Package
Directory". I am interested of the contents of the directory you
entered on that screen and in any subdirectories of the above
directory which loook like URLs.
Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 3:55:32 PM, you wrote:
LG> Well
Well, I had deleted it; but in another case, I have this,
going with WIn2k defaults:
C:\cygwin\etc\setup\last-cache
C:\cygwin\etc\setup\last-mirror
C:\cygwin\etc\setup\timestamp
C:\cygwin\var\log\setup.log
C:\cygwin\var\log\setup.log.full
I'm happy to send the logs if you wish.
One note, in the
Hello Lee,
Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 2:53:30 PM, you wrote:
LG> In two cases, my package dirs contain just setup.ini.
LG> In one case, I have etc, which contains three files: last-cache,
LG> timestamp, and last-mirror. The latter contains just the URI:
LG> ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/sources.re
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:53:30PM +0200, Lee Goddard wrote:
>In every case, the systsem hangs with the dialogue box saying
>"This space intentionally blank" (or such) and the window is shown
>as "Not responding" in Windows' task manager, with 100% use
>of a 1400 mhz CPU.
I hate to chime in wit
lank" (or such) and the window is shown
as "Not responding" in Windows' task manager, with 100% use
of a 1400 mhz CPU.
Thanks - HTH
lee
>Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 1:29:10 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>LG> Sorry - forgot the obvious: it is the latest version at the
>LG> t
s the latest version at the
LG> time of writing, which is 2.218.2.8.
LG> >
>> >
>> > Hi there.
>> >
>> > The latest setup.exe fails on my system: 100% CPU indefinetly
>> > and all the screen says is something like 'this space
>> > i
Sorry - forgot the obvious: it is the latest version at the
time of writing, which is 2.218.2.8.
>
> >
> > Hi there.
> >
> > The latest setup.exe fails on my system: 100% CPU indefinetly
> > and all the screen says is something like 'this space
> > i
Please quote the setup.exe version number when reporting bugs!
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Lee Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)
>
>
> Hi there.
&
Hi there.
The latest setup.exe fails on my system: 100% CPU indefinetly
and all the screen says is something like 'this space intentionally blank.'
I've tried 10 different mirrors, it downloads something from them
Itelling me if it can't or if the setup.ini is out of date in
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter A. Castro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 9:48 AM
> I don't know if anyone has encountered this, yet, or not,
> so in the great developer tradition, I pulled the source for
> the installer
> (setup-md5-20020504-src.tar.bz
Hi All,
I've just recently subscribed to this list (digest form), but I've
actually been 'reading' it for some time (I pull an incremental image of
the cygwin.com site (from a mirror, of course) a every-other-day
schedule).
I've been using Cygwin for over a year now, and I just have to say tha
26 matches
Mail list logo
