This thread has a lot of misinformation and just plain confusion.
For starters, term.h != termcap.h. Some messages in this thread talk
about term.h, others about termcap.h -- and seem to mean one when
they're talking about the other. Sigh.
Also, /usr/include/termcap.h is NOT the ncurses versi
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:37:45AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Just checked on both of my servers, they symlink /usr/include/term.h with
>ncurses/term.h, running RedHat 6.1 and 8.0. Should cygwin/ncurses do the
>same?
>
> The QNX proprietary term_* functions have been deprecated in favor of
>
bject: Re: LFTP: cygwin and setupterm
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:12:54AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>
...
>>
>> #if defined(__CYGWIN__)
>> # include
>> # include
>> #elif defined(HAVE_CURSES_H)
>> # include
>> # if defined(HAVE_
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:12:54AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The setupterm() function lives in the ncurses package
>> (/usr/include/ncurses/term.h). The problem happens in the if pre-processor
>> clause on line 26 of lftp_tinfo.cc. I got
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> May not have been the right thing to do but got past that
> problem.
Actually I think you and Larry are right. What would happen if
I had /usr/include/termcap.h from libtermcap and not ncurses ?
I don't think LFTP or anything should mix headers.
I
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The setupterm() function lives in the ncurses package
> (/usr/include/ncurses/term.h). The problem happens in the if pre-processor
> clause on line 26 of lftp_tinfo.cc. I got around that by changing the order
> and switching an if to an elif statemen
At 11:46 PM 12/16/2002, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>
> > At 11:03 PM 12/16/2002, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > >Anybody know what's wrong ? I tried to compile LFTP 2.6.3 with
> > >ncurses 5.2-8 and got the following:
> > >
> > >/cyg
D]
Subject: LFTP: Cygwin and setupterm
Anybody know what's wrong ? I tried to compile LFTP 2.6.3 with
ncurses 5.2-8 and got the following:
/cygdrive/g/Linux/lftp/src/lftp_tinfo.cc: In function `void
init_terminfo()':
/cygdrive/g/Linux/lftp/src/lftp_tinfo.cc:50: implicit declaration of
fun
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> At 11:03 PM 12/16/2002, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> >Anybody know what's wrong ? I tried to compile LFTP 2.6.3 with
> >ncurses 5.2-8 and got the following:
> >
> >/cygdrive/g/Linux/lftp/src/lftp_tinfo.cc: In function `void init_termi
At 11:03 PM 12/16/2002, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>Anybody know what's wrong ? I tried to compile LFTP 2.6.3 with
>ncurses 5.2-8 and got the following:
>
>/cygdrive/g/Linux/lftp/src/lftp_tinfo.cc: In function `void init_terminfo()':
>/cygdrive/g/Linux/lftp/src/lftp_tinfo.cc:50: implicit declara
Anybody know what's wrong ? I tried to compile LFTP 2.6.3 with
ncurses 5.2-8 and got the following:
/cygdrive/g/Linux/lftp/src/lftp_tinfo.cc: In function `void init_terminfo()':
/cygdrive/g/Linux/lftp/src/lftp_tinfo.cc:50: implicit declaration of function `int
setupterm(...)'
There's the followi
11 matches
Mail list logo