On Jan 30 05:00, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:40:55 +0100
> >>> Corinna Vinschen said:
>
> > When comparing strings linguistically (strcoll/wcscoll),
> >
> > - are Hiragana and Katakana forms of the same character to be
> > treated as equal or as different?
>
> They shou
>>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:40:55 +0100
>>> Corinna Vinschen said:
> When comparing strings linguistically (strcoll/wcscoll),
>
> - are Hiragana and Katakana forms of the same character to be
> treated as equal or as different?
They should be treated as different.
> - are half-width and full-wi
On Jan 21 16:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 21 10:04, Mark J. Reed wrote:
[Intersting stuff]
>
> Thanks for the info. However...
>
>
> linux$ cat jp.c
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> int
> main (int argc, char **argv)
> {
> setlocale (LC_ALL, "ja_JP.UTF-8");
>
On Jan 21 10:04, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > would somebody with Japanese and/or Chinese language background be so
> > When comparing strings linguistically (strcoll/wcscoll),
> > - are Hiragana and Katakana forms of the same character to be
>
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> would somebody with Japanese and/or Chinese language background be so
> kind to answer the below two questions?
I have some (outdated) background in I18N and Japanese L10N, though
I'm not a native speaker of either Japanese or any Chinese
Hi,
would somebody with Japanese and/or Chinese language background be so
kind to answer the below two questions?
When comparing strings linguistically (strcoll/wcscoll),
- are Hiragana and Katakana forms of the same character to be
treated as equal or as different?
- are half-width and full-
6 matches
Mail list logo
