* Paul Domaskis (Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:27:04 -0400)
> Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > * Paul Domaskis (Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:47:16 -0400) wrote:
> >> I will be using a standalone Win2K machine on which I will likely
> >> not have admin access. Will this be a problem, if I choose to
> >> install only for th
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Paul Domaskis (Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:47:16 -0400) wrote:
>>
>> I will be using a standalone Win2K machine on which I will likely
>> not have admin access. Will this be a problem, if I choose to
>> install only for the account of interest?
>
> No, I use that version exclusi
* Paul Domaskis (Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:47:16 -0400)
> I will be using a standalone Win2K machine on which I will likely not
> have admin access. Will this be a problem, if I choose to install
> only for the account of interest?
No, I use that version exclusively on my machines (because I run Cygwin
I will be using a standalone Win2K machine on which I will likely not
have admin access. Will this be a problem, if I choose to install
only for the account of interest? There are various web references to
the requirement for admin, but they are generally associated with
specific packages e.g. Op
4 matches
Mail list logo