Re: Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences

2005-12-21 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:24:56PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > Sorry but there is currently no way to represent "either/or" > > dependencies via "setup.exe" (PTC). That said, there's no reason that > > you can't override "setup.exe"

Re: Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences

2005-12-21 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:24:56PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > Sorry but there is currently no way to represent "either/or" dependencies > via "setup.exe" (PTC). That said, there's no reason that you can't override > "setup.exe" and not install gs-no-X11. If you know that's what you want,

Re: Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences

2005-12-20 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Rodrigo Medina wrote: Hi, There are two different gs programs distributed, one linked to the X11 library which is put in /usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe and another no-X11 that goes into /bin/gs.exe. Here starts the problem: two different programs with the same name. Actually if you have X11 there is no re

Inconvenient ghostscript and transfig dependences

2005-12-20 Thread Rodrigo Medina
Hi, There are two different gs programs distributed, one linked to the X11 library which is put in /usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe and another no-X11 that goes into /bin/gs.exe. Here starts the problem: two different programs with the same name. Actually if you have X11 there is no reason of installing the g