l openssl, and now I have version 3.0.13 30 which
> resolves the problem.
>
> I had version OpenSSL 1.1.1f installed on another machine, which did not
> display the error.
>
> I am just posting here in case someone else runs into this issue.
>
what about to use the Cygwin se
error.
I am just posting here in case someone else runs into this issue.
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Hi Ken and Brian-
Yes, that seemed to work. I will try to test it out. It did create the
extension dll file named amf3.dll.
THANKS for being so patient!
jim
On Monday, June 20, 2022, 06:18:59 AM EDT, Jim McNamara via Cygwin
wrote:
Hi Ken and Brian-
I am going to try a symlink
Hi Ken and Brian-
I am going to try a symlink and trick cygwin to finding the right dll. I put
the dll on my LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
thanks,
jim
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
On 2020-01-28 15:02, aimedtech wrote:
> No doubt Andy's a great guy, I just don't want him to think I'm trying to
> bother him.
>
> Now about my install problem:
>
> I think the problem MIGHT HAVE BEEN (and still is,) that I'm running windoz 7.
>
> People got angry that I didn't provide additio
No doubt Andy's a great guy, I just don't want him to think I'm trying to
bother him.
Now about my install problem:
I think the problem MIGHT HAVE BEEN (and still is,) that I'm running windoz 7.
People got angry that I didn't provide additional info, but every method I
tried failed; Each said
I downloaded libheif and when I configured it and built with the
--enable-shared option, it didn't build a .dll
The /usr/lib/libheif.la doesn't contain a library:
# libheif.la - a libtool library file
# Generated by libtool (GNU libtool) 2.4.6
#
# Please DO NOT delete this file!
# It is necessary
On 11/27/2013 03:18 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build m4-1.4.17 and am getting an error. I tried
> downloading the src using the GUI interface but just got a file
> 'm4-1.4.17-1.cygwin.patch' with no real changes, but the following in
> the text.
&g
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:18:09PM +, Aaron Gray wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to build m4-1.4.17 and am getting an error. I tried
>downloading the src using the GUI interface but just got a file
>'m4-1.4.17-1.cygwin.patch' with no real changes, but the following in
Hi,
I am trying to build m4-1.4.17 and am getting an error. I tried
downloading the src using the GUI interface but just got a file
'm4-1.4.17-1.cygwin.patch' with no real changes, but the following in
the text.
~~~
+Build instructions:
+ unpack m4-1.4.17-1-src.tar.bz2
+if you us
Tupper.Tupper
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
On 8/5/2010 2:45 PM, Jeff Silverman wrote:
I am not sure this is the right place to report a problem - I found this
address from http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-03/msg01078.html
I get the following errors:
$ scp C728219_a_-rrd-files.tar.gz r...@172.24.74.4/var/tmp/C728219/a
cp: skipping
I am not sure this is the right place to report a problem - I found this
address from http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-03/msg01078.html
I get the following errors:
$ scp C728219_a_-rrd-files.tar.gz r...@172.24.74.4/var/tmp/C728219/a
cp: skipping file `C728219_a_-rrd-files.tar.gz', as i
Ich werde ab 24.04.2008 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
25.04.2008.
I am not in office on April, 24th. I will be back on April, 25th.
As for ATIC92-94, OVP3 and SPS4 please contact Mr. Hans Falter.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports
hi all,
i have been struggling with this error which i am
facing..cygpath: error converting : --filename too
long
...could any body help me how to get rid of this
error...
Please give me the solution for this problem ..
i am working on cygwin on windows xp platform..
Yours sincerely
Basuki
kiran kumar wrote:
hello guys,
i want g++ compiler exactly as it works
in linux. what are the packages i have to install? so
it will work well in windows too.
Err... What you mean by "as it works in linux". Because Linux itself
doesn't really contain g++ compiler, you have to be mor
* kiran kumar (2004-04-07 11:35 +0100)
> hello guys,
> i want g++ compiler exactly as it works
> in linux. what are the packages i have to install? so
> it will work well in windows too.
Setup.exe -> Developer
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Probl
hello guys,
i want g++ compiler exactly as it works
in linux. what are the packages i have to install? so
it will work well in windows too.
with regards.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/de
Re: Re: Your application
I will be away from the office Friday, August 22 through Monday, September 1. If you
need immediate assistance, please contact Julia Kang at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 573-0919.
Otherwise I will respond to your email when I return on Tuesday.
With utmost respect and sincerity I appeal to disturb you a bit at this particular
moment. I will tell you more about myself once I receive your reply. I am currently in
Praia, Republic of Cape Verde, a little country or islands in the North Atlantic Ocean
and I am contacting you secretly
With utmost respect and sincerity I appeal to disturb you a bit at this particular
moment. I will tell you more about myself once I receive your reply. I am currently in
Praia, Republic of Cape Verde, a little country or islands in the North Atlantic Ocean
and I am contacting you secretly
confidentiality to the newsgroup as you did.
I am sure that we also have a few hundred lawyers as members. I won't
start with lawyer jokes now... So -s- don't tell anybody else.
with kind regards
günter strubinsky
- -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Dear Sir,
Good day. I need your services in a confidential matter
regarding money out of a family beneficiary deposit.
This requires a private arrangement. Could you perhaps
receive these funds under legal claims?. I am willing
to pay a generous management fee as well as appreciation
for fewer
Hi, everybody,
Where can I download all manpages or info file for all posix.1/96 system call
implemented in cygwin. In cygwin's faq I only find the list of these functions but
there are no description.
Thank you for your help.
Daniel
Daniel COTTO
France Telecom R&D (FTR&D/DMI/AEI/MMI)
Si
> -Original Message-
> From: John Morrison [mailto:john@;morrison.mine.nu]
> Sent: 31 October 2002 15:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Why cygwin says Administrator@KOLESNIA when I am
> logged int
> to w2k as kolesnia?
>
>
> On Thu, 31
s anybody know why cygwin shows my name as
> > "Administrator" however i am
> > > >logged in w2k as user kolesnia? This user has
> > administrator rights in w2k.
> > > >Alexey.
> > >
> > > I'm going to point you in the general dire
> -Original Message-
> From: John Morrison [mailto:john@;morrison.mine.nu]
> Sent: 31 October 2002 14:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Why cygwin says Administrator@KOLESNIA when I am
> logged int
> to w2k as kolesnia?
>
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, La
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> At 05:58 AM 10/31/2002, Alexey Kolesnikov wrote:
> >Does anybody know why cygwin shows my name as "Administrator" however i am
> >logged in w2k as user kolesnia? This user has administrator rights in w2k.
&g
At 05:58 AM 10/31/2002, Alexey Kolesnikov wrote:
>Does anybody know why cygwin shows my name as "Administrator" however i am
>logged in w2k as user kolesnia? This user has administrator rights in w2k.
>Alexey.
I'm going to point you in the general direction of the ema
Does anybody know why cygwin shows my name as "Administrator" however i am
logged in w2k as user kolesnia? This user has administrator rights in w2k.
Alexey.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Doc
In the first hand, i dunno if that comes from my browsers by i have two different
version of http://cygwin.com
When I am using mozilla, i got an updated one, and when I use IE I have an old one.
The second point, i would like to underline is that the port of bitchx is not a new
thing, i used it
great. I believe that what I've referenced above
above are just some of the main
assumptions where questions about Cygwin are concerned, or any of the Cygwin Setup
included apps/binutils/utils
are concerned. I trust that cgf or any of the moderators for this list "will" correct
and removed it. I am
not going to go into what I had to do to remove it it was too long ago. I
then installed the one from the CD. That one didn't work either. I then
installed the CD Cygwin in Windows 98 and it worked about 98% wasn't too
bad.
So to be as staright as I can, Cygwin in
Got you. I don't recall if a reboot was necessary. All I remember was that
the Cygwin installation didn't work. I then rebooted hoping then it would
work. It didn't I BSOD'd. Now that was in Windows 2000 Professional which
is doing very well now thank you. I was going to put Cygwin in Window
Not wanting to put salt an open wound...just commenting...fact is, Cygwin can not
cause BSOD. Only OS can
regurgitate BSODs.
Also, if you had checked memory dumps, you would probably know it had nothing
to do with Cygwin.
Probably had something to do with a faulty (pirated?) version
cgf worte:
> ...
> I appreciate your (Cliff) letting people know about your experiences
> with Norton on XP. ...
Actually it was with NT4SP6. And I can't be sure that it was a
bug in the Symantic/Norton code, as the system had been 'repaired'
and the Norton s/w was rather old. But it does illus
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:48:12PM +0100, Cliff Hones wrote:
>>It wasn't setup that BSOD'd the op sys it was rebooting after the
>>setup. Jeeze! And please if you want to give me the old "screw you"
>>that doesn't help any. You may think my op sys is hanging on by it's
>>IDE cable and if so that
> It wasn't setup that BSOD'd the op sys it was rebooting after the setup.
> Jeeze! And please if you want to give me the old "screw you" that doesn't
> help any. You may think my op sys is hanging on by it's IDE cable and if so
> that's your call. I cannot believe you suggested installing a
It wasn't setup that BSOD'd the op sys it was rebooting after the setup.
Jeeze! And please if you want to give me the old "screw you" that doesn't
help any. You may think my op sys is hanging on by it's IDE cable and if so
that's your call. I cannot believe you suggested installing a Norton
pro
It ain't me man wha!
--
George Hester
_
"Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > ROTFLMAO
> >
> > George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
>
Christopher Faylor wrote on Saturday, April 20, 2002 11:38 PM:
> ... You might also want to invest in
> something like Norton Systemworks which has diagnostic tools that may
> help narrow down what's wrong with your system.
Hmm. Recently we had an NT system which was frequently BSOD'ing
(not Cy
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:40:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 4:14 AM
>
>> (*) has anybody ported GnuPG to cygwin? Would you mind supporting it
>> and adding it to the cygwin dist?
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 4:14 AM
> (*) has anybody ported GnuPG to cygwin? Would you mind supporting it
> and adding it to the cygwin dist?
If someone has ported it to mingw, that would be even better
n, since no one else has to reinstall their system after running
setup, I think I am on pretty safe grounds assuming that this is *your*
problem. If I was you, I'd be very alarmed about the instability of my
system and I would be doing whatever possible to stabilize it. Cygwin
setup is the l
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:39:15 -0400 Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ROTFLMAO
>
> George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
> four (count 'em, FOUR) "Message not delivered, virus/sensitive content
> found" bounce messages from HIS account. Apparently,
Charles Wilson wrote:
> ROTFLMAO
>
> George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
> four (count 'em, FOUR) "Message not delivered, virus/sensitive content
> found" bounce messages from HIS account. Apparently, George's email
> account is paranoid about ".README"
ROTFLMAO
George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
four (count 'em, FOUR) "Message not delivered, virus/sensitive content
found" bounce messages from HIS account. Apparently, George's email
account is paranoid about ".README" files .zip files, in addition to
p
George Hester wrote:
> The information I have garnered here has helped to maybe stick my toes in
> the fire again. I will wait a while and see if there is any good soul that
> can explain the procedures for a manual setup. And if that is pie in the sky
> then at that point I will decide if walk
At 01:51 PM 4/20/2002, George Hester wrote:
>Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know
>nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If
>I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had
>before its destruction. You
Michael A Chase wrote:
> I'm having trouble understanding how setup.exe became the source of all
> evil in the universe. You had one BSOD months ago which may or may not
> have been caused by setup.exe and as a result you are unwilling to try
> another version of it ever again.
>
> A client le
Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know
nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If
I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had
before its destruction. You may not believe me but I assure you that is the
IMHO, cygwin setup works like a champ. I've install cygwin on 4
machiness in the past year, nary a BSOD.
Stick your toes back in. The water was never that bad in the first
place.
;-)
David
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 12:35, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:19:40AM -0400, Ge
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:19:40AM -0400, George Hester wrote:
>Do you have all your toes?
Sure. My toes are not so sensitive that they become burned off if
I encounter a problem with my system.
I'm also the kind of guy who thinks that if something is working for 99%
of the people out there and
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 02:51:45 -0400 George Hester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realize that at one time setup.exe might not have been all that it was
> thought to be. And that now it may be better. But once burned many
> people
> do not jump back in the flames. Well I decided I would stick my
Do you have all your toes?
--
George Hester
_
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 02:51:45AM -0400, George Hester wrote:
> >Suggestion. Let's consider a Manual Install Dir
> -Original Message-
> From: George Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 4:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: I am not going to let Cygwin BSOD my Windows 2000 Server
Consider this: A BSOD is equivalent to a unix kernel panic - us
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 02:51:45AM -0400, George Hester wrote:
>Suggestion. Let's consider a Manual Install Direction for us weenies
>that lost a few toes trying to install this software in the past.
You're making things way too hard for yourself. Just run setup.exe
and select "Install" rather
install literature because of the way setup.exe let me download these files.
I had to un bzip2 them; ungz them; untar them and they are now sitting here
ready to be installed. So I went looking for that Manual install.
Yeah right. So I wrote here. A few people have written to me telling me
that I
Thanks! Now everything works absolutely spiffing!!
Andrew Markebo wrote:
> Well there is a users guide at http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/,
> more exaktly (well to be honest I searched for "mkpasswd", and assumed
> that the stuff about -d would be told)
> http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/u
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 07:31:58PM -, Chris January wrote:
>> > / Mattias Br?ndstr?m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > | After searching the FAQ for the phrase 'mkpasswd -d' I must report that
>> > | it does not exist within the FAQ. Do you have any other information on
>> > | where I can RTFM?
> > / Mattias Brändström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | After searching the FAQ for the phrase 'mkpasswd -d' I must report
that
> > | it does not exist within the FAQ. Do you have any other information on
> > | where I can RTFM?
> >
> > Well there is a users guide at http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin
/ Mattias Brändström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| After searching the FAQ for the phrase 'mkpasswd -d' I must report that
| it does not exist within the FAQ. Do you have any other information on
| where I can RTFM?
Well there is a users guide at http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/,
more exaktly
passwd -d".
>
> -Alex
>
> On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 06:05, Mattias Brändström wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have some questions about how cygwin determines what user I am logged
> > in as on my Win2000 machine.
> >
> > I have installed cygwin on my Win200
Have you considered RTFM? Or more specifically, the FAQ. Look for
"mkpasswd -d".
-Alex
On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 06:05, Mattias Brändström wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have some questions about how cygwin determines what user I am logged
> in as on my Win2000 machine.
>
> I
Hi!
I have some questions about how cygwin determines what user I am logged
in as on my Win2000 machine.
I have installed cygwin on my Win2000 machine and I am logged on that
one as DOMAIN/userx. DOMAIN/userx is not a local user for my machine but
a user in the domain DOMAIN. Now when I
65 matches
Mail list logo
