Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:54:06AM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Jul, I wrote:
I was going to qualify this with `when ntsec is defined in CYGWIN'
It's not easy to find out if ntsec is turned on, is it? When I wrote
the above, I was think
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:54:06AM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>On 23 Jul, I wrote:
>>
>>>I was going to qualify this with `when ntsec is defined in CYGWIN'
>>
>>
>>It's not easy to find out if ntsec is turned on, is it? When I wrote
>>the above, I was thinking "ntsec tu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Jul, I wrote:
I was going to qualify this with `when ntsec is defined in CYGWIN'
It's not easy to find out if ntsec is turned on, is it? When I wrote
the above, I was thinking "ntsec turned on" means $CYGWIN includes the
word "ntsec".
But I think I've just reali
On 23 Jul, I wrote:
> I was going to qualify this with `when ntsec is defined in CYGWIN'
It's not easy to find out if ntsec is turned on, is it? When I wrote
the above, I was thinking "ntsec turned on" means $CYGWIN includes the
word "ntsec".
But I think I've just realised that isn't true, is
4 matches
Mail list logo