On Jan 26 23:51, John Mellor wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-23-01 at 16:03 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > You have two choices:
> >
> > - Comply with the GPL in one way or the other, which always means your
> > application is also GPLed and you have to open the source code to
> > your customer.
> >
On Sun, 2005-23-01 at 16:03 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 23 09:28, John Mellor wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-22-01 at 20:22 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:17:44PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > > >I don't know if the ancient Bxx series was LGPL, but the curr
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:28:45AM -0500, John Mellor wrote:
>On Sat, 2005-22-01 at 20:22 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:17:44PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
>> >John Mellor wrote:
>> >>Correct me if I'm mistaken, but if I'm going to make a few dollars off
>> >>of a n
On Jan 23 09:28, John Mellor wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-22-01 at 20:22 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:17:44PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > >I don't know if the ancient Bxx series was LGPL, but the current Cygwin
> > >source is GPL which means you must provide not only
On Sat, 2005-22-01 at 20:06 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:00:00PM -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> >On Sat, 2005-22-01 at 18:44 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:23:41PM -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> >> >I'm looking for the source for the cygw
On Sat, 2005-22-01 at 20:22 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:17:44PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> >John Mellor wrote:
> >>Correct me if I'm mistaken, but if I'm going to make a few dollars off
> >>of a non-free something that links in an open source library, I need to
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:17:44PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
>John Mellor wrote:
>>Correct me if I'm mistaken, but if I'm going to make a few dollars off
>>of a non-free something that links in an open source library, I need to
>>provide the source for the open-source parts with the product, or f
John Mellor wrote:
> Correct me if I'm mistaken, but if I'm going to make a few dollars off
> of a non-free something that links in an open source library, I need to
> provide the source for the open-source parts with the product, or fall
> afoul of the LGPL. So, to make everybody happy, I believ
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:00:00PM -0500, John Mellor wrote:
>On Sat, 2005-22-01 at 18:44 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:23:41PM -0500, John Mellor wrote:
>> >I'm looking for the source for the cygwin1.dll b.20.1.19 version, put
>> >out in 1999. The CVS tree on the
On Sat, 2005-22-01 at 18:44 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:23:41PM -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> >I'm looking for the source for the cygwin1.dll b.20.1.19 version, put
> >out in 1999. The CVS tree on the RedHat site only goes back 4 years,
> >and I guess they just thre
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:23:41PM -0500, John Mellor wrote:
I'm looking for the source for the cygwin1.dll b.20.1.19 version, put
out in 1999. The CVS tree on the RedHat site only goes back 4 years,
and I guess they just threw everything before that in the bit bucket.
An
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:23:41PM -0500, John Mellor wrote:
>I'm looking for the source for the cygwin1.dll b.20.1.19 version, put
>out in 1999. The CVS tree on the RedHat site only goes back 4 years,
>and I guess they just threw everything before that in the bit bucket.
>
>Anybody got a copy, or
Hi,
I'm looking for the source for the cygwin1.dll b.20.1.19 version, put
out in 1999. The CVS tree on the RedHat site only goes back 4 years,
and I guess they just threw everything before that in the bit bucket.
Anybody got a copy, or know where I can get it?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://
13 matches
Mail list logo
