Re: GetModuleHandle@4

2002-04-26 Thread Jason Tishler
Sander, On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:19:05AM +0200, Sander Timmermans wrote: > Where can I get these programs :( http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=pexports Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documenta

RE: GetModuleHandle@4

2002-04-26 Thread Sander Timmermans
les Wilson > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: GetModuleHandle@4 > > > Perhaps a bit offtopic question, but I will asked it anyway, > being as evil as I am };-] muhahah oh uh.. ok. > > The .dll is now built according to this design: > > dll: $(DLL_NAME) > $(DL

RE: GetModuleHandle@4

2002-04-26 Thread Sander Timmermans
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of Sander Timmermans > Sent: 24 April 2002 19:14 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: GetModuleHandle@4 > > > I adapted the script made by John Cerney; > http://cygwin.com/building-reloc

RE: GetModuleHandle@4

2002-04-25 Thread Sander Timmermans
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 April 2002 19:20 > To: Sander Timmermans > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: GetModuleHandle@4 > > > Oh geez. One of these days I'll follow thru on my promise to revamp the > "how to build a dll" docu

Re: GetModuleHandle@4

2002-04-24 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
AME).dll $? -e _dll_entry@12 >#----------- > >$(LIBIDL) is a win32 library. >but after this $(LD) line I get GetModuleHandle@4 as a linker error >(unreferenced symbol) in /

Re: GetModuleHandle@4

2002-04-24 Thread Charles Wilson
Oh geez. One of these days I'll follow thru on my promise to revamp the "how to build a dll" docu on cygwin's website. For now: the information you are using is hopelessly out of date. Go here: http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/dll-stuff/ and download the dllhelpers package.

GetModuleHandle@4

2002-04-24 Thread Sander Timmermans
s/[^_]*_//' >> $(NAME).def $(LD) --base-file $(NAME).base --dll -o $(NAME).dll $? -e _dll_entry@12 #--- $(LIBIDL) is a win32 library. but after this $(LD) li